Discuss Scratch
- ChristianPro2
-
Scratcher
31 posts
Goofy block names on april fools
urgh
2.or block
3.round block
<<> but also <>>::operators1.<>and<> block
<<> or if you want maybe <>>::operators
(about ())::operators
2.or block
3.round block
- FreshTheCat
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Goofy block names on april fools
I meantYou meant<<> but also <>> ::operators1.<>and<> block
<<> or if you want maybe <>> ::operators
(about ()) ::operators
2.or block
3.round block
<<>but also<> ::operators>my version would be
<<>or if you want maybe<> ::operators>
(about () ::operators)
<<> but also <> is true? ::operators>
<any of these are true <><>? ::operators>
(() if it wasn't a decimal ::operators)
<<>but also<> ::operators>
<<>or if you want maybe<> ::operators>
(about () ::operators)
<<> but also <> is true? ::operators>
<any of these are true <><>? ::operators>
(() if it wasn't a decimal ::operators)
- gem1001
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Goofy block names on april fools
I meant<<> but also <>> ::operators1.<>and<> block
<<> or if you want maybe <>> ::operators
(about ()) ::operators
2.or block
3.round block
<<> but also <> ::operators>You need to put the :: bit inside the brackets
<<> or if you want maybe <> ::operators>
(about () ::operators)
- AxyArcher
-
Scratcher
25 posts
Goofy block names on april fools
Hi!
Last edited by AxyArcher (Dec. 19, 2025 18:52:22)
- coder2310
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Goofy block names on april fools
Hi!Hello! Just letting you know, your supposed to only talk about the current subject in the suggestions forum -this one being about how it would be funny if blocks had goofy names on april-.
But if you want to introduce yourself to people, it would be great to go to the “new scratchers” forum and start a post there!
Last edited by coder2310 (Dec. 19, 2025 18:55:24)
- ChristianPro2
-
Scratcher
31 posts
Goofy block names on april fools
yeah thxI meantYou meant<<> but also <>> ::operators1.<>and<> block
<<> or if you want maybe <>> ::operators
(about ()) ::operators
2.or block
3.round block<<>but also<> ::operators>my version would be
<<>or if you want maybe<> ::operators>
(about () ::operators)<<> but also <> is true? ::operators>
<any of these are true <><>? ::operators>
(() if it wasn't a decimal ::operators)<<>but also<> ::operators>
<<>or if you want maybe<> ::operators>
(about () ::operators)
<<> but also <> is true? ::operators>
<any of these are true <><>? ::operators>
(() if it wasn't a decimal ::operators)