All right,i have see many projects that do not have many views,or user who just want to be epic popular,so submit any game,and i will review it


limits:NONE!

all right here my scale:4-7=OK

8-14=good

15-20=great!

21-29=AWESOME!!!

30-&=EPIC!!!!

dont expect to got epic,that takes a lot to get of me

so just post your projects and i will check daily


The LeaderBoards are with:

Otimus (MMORPG) http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/10783484/

Fight Monsters with friends!!!

Or Fight Your Friends!!!

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/10783484/

It's still in Alpha, so a lot of work is to be done. :]

Tierage wrote:

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/10783484/

It's still in Alpha, so a lot of work is to be done. :]

All Right,i rate games on Three systems,

Graphics:10/10 The Graphics where just….awesome!

Performance:10/10 I found no lag! none!!

Bugs:9/10 The only Bug i Found was i could not attack slimes,because i was on top of them,of course,that might be MY problem,tell me if so

Based on your scores…….you get an AWESOME!!!!! game

sorry,an epic takes 10/10 all

Paper mario 2 please.

Please review this one:
Planet Defense

mountainfrog wrote:

Tierage wrote:

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/10783484/

It's still in Alpha, so a lot of work is to be done. :]

All Right,i rate games on Three systems,

Graphics:10/10 The Graphics where just….awesome!

Performance:10/10 I found no lag! none!!

Bugs:9/10 The only Bug i Found was i could not attack slimes,because i was on top of them,of course,that might be MY problem,tell me if so

Based on your scores…….you get an AWESOME!!!!! game

sorry,an epic takes 10/10 all

Why only Graphics, bugs and performance? A good game needs much more! The most important thing is GAMEPLAY or do you play games only because they look nice and have no bugs? Difficulty is also a big factor, because always too easy games often do not make fun, but too hard difficulty is also bad.
You can choose waht you will rate, but in my opinion it's much more than these 3 things. I just wanted it to say

you looked at before but I wanted to know how you would rank it so far.
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/3031010

TM_ wrote:

mountainfrog wrote:

Tierage wrote:

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/10783484/

It's still in Alpha, so a lot of work is to be done. :]

All Right,i rate games on Three systems,

Graphics:10/10 The Graphics where just….awesome!

Performance:10/10 I found no lag! none!!

Bugs:9/10 The only Bug i Found was i could not attack slimes,because i was on top of them,of course,that might be MY problem,tell me if so

Based on your scores…….you get an AWESOME!!!!! game

sorry,an epic takes 10/10 all

Why only Graphics, bugs and performance? A good game needs much more! The most important thing is GAMEPLAY or do you play games only because they look nice and have no bugs? Difficulty is also a big factor, because always too easy games often do not make fun, but too hard difficulty is also bad.
You can choose waht you will rate, but in my opinion it's much more than these 3 things. I just wanted it to say

Thanks for the idea!

i will add i n Gameplay to the list

I noticed that in the category of “performance”, you grade a project partly based on lag. Often times, though, it is not at all the creator's fault if certain points are lagging. There is simply too much data to perform intricate functions in a small amount of time. To my knowledge of Scratch, there is no way that a programmer can entirely fix this problem. Lag also changes depending on what device is being used to play a project. For example, I created a game called Doctor Who- Desperate Measures. On my computer, there is hardly any lag whatsoever, but to others, the lag is very prominent. I fear that a project might receive a low score simply because of an issue that there is currently no way of solving. I am in no way trying to criticize, I am merely offering a suggestion. Thank you so much for taking the time to review all requested projects, that's very kind of you! Stay brilliant!