Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » The Opposite of the Join Block
- Little_Mittle12345
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
The Opposite of the Join Block
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/179531/?page=2#post-4357779 dupe.Also,here's a workaround though(delete letter () of []::operators)define delete letter (ltr) of (word)support for the original because this would be helpful for decoding and other stuff and the workaround is a bit long especially for new scratchers
delete (all v) of [ltrs v]
repeat (length of (word))
add (letter (length of [ltrs v] ::list) of (word)) to [ltrs v]
end
delete (ltr) of [ltrs v]
set [result v] to []
repeat (length of [ltrs v] :: list)
set [result v] to (join (result) (item (length of (result) + (1) ::operators) of [ltrs v] :: list))
end
- Kitten-da-Cat
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
The Opposite of the Join Block
Youre a dupe ur hddhdhdhhdhttps://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/179531/?page=2#post-4357779 dupe.Also,here's a workaround though(delete letter () of []::operators)define delete letter (ltr) of (word)support for the original because this would be helpful for decoding and other stuff and the workaround is a bit long especially for new scratchers
delete (all v) of [ltrs v]
repeat (length of (word))
add (letter (length of [ltrs v] ::list) of (word)) to [ltrs v]
end
delete (ltr) of [ltrs v]
set [result v] to []
repeat (length of [ltrs v] :: list)
set [result v] to (join (result) (item (length of (result) + (1) ::operators) of [ltrs v] :: list))
end
- cs3868895
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
The Opposite of the Join Block
I don't want a workaround, How was I supposed to know?Youre a dupe ur hddhdhdhhdhttps://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/179531/?page=2#post-4357779 dupe.Also,here's a workaround though(delete letter () of []::operators)define delete letter (ltr) of (word)support for the original because this would be helpful for decoding and other stuff and the workaround is a bit long especially for new scratchers
delete (all v) of [ltrs v]
repeat (length of (word))
add (letter (length of [ltrs v] ::list) of (word)) to [ltrs v]
end
delete (ltr) of [ltrs v]
set [result v] to []
repeat (length of [ltrs v] :: list)
set [result v] to (join (result) (item (length of (result) + (1) ::operators) of [ltrs v] :: list))
end
Support, I actually like this idea of having it as an operator, saves time and useful for code.
- rodper6635
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
The Opposite of the Join Block
Support, useful when you only need certain parts of a string.
- diepipis
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
The Opposite of the Join Block
Support!
I don’t need it (I think) but the situations presented in this topic are pretty convincing!
+1
I don’t need it (I think) but the situations presented in this topic are pretty convincing!
+1
- mingo-gag
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
The Opposite of the Join Block
Support.
VERY much supportPlz explain why you support
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
-
» The Opposite of the Join Block







