Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
![[RSS Feed]](//cdn.scratch.mit.edu/scratchr2/static/__5b3e40ec58a840b41702360e9891321b__//djangobb_forum/img/feed-icon-small.png "[RSS Feed]")
![[RSS Feed]](http://cdn.scratch.mit.edu/scratchr2/static/__5b3e40ec58a840b41702360e9891321b__//djangobb_forum/img/feed-icon-small.png "[RSS Feed]"){kind=icon}
- CodeComet6161
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
Q: Is this a duplicate?
A: No. That topic (which I just bumped) is NOT the same as this topic. That topic is asking for a way to make separate custom reporters and booleans, without the use of creating a block. This suggestion is talking about… Well, read to find out.
Introduction
This suggestion is asking for a way to put reporters INSIDE booleans and other reporters and vice versa. With the current setting, attempting to do this will only create another slot.
Why do I want this?
There are a number of reasons I want this. Here are some, just to name a few.
1: Custom Logic Gates
What we want:
The result:
2: Trans-Programming Language Blocks (OK this is probably just me)
What we want:
The result:
The possibilities are just endless with this.
“No support, how are you supposed to toggle it?”
Simple. If you're editing text and you hit the reporter/boolean button, it'll be placed where the cursor is. If not, it'll place it normally.
Edit: I had to change the title so it could be distinguished.
A: No. That topic (which I just bumped) is NOT the same as this topic. That topic is asking for a way to make separate custom reporters and booleans, without the use of creating a block. This suggestion is talking about… Well, read to find out.
Introduction
This suggestion is asking for a way to put reporters INSIDE booleans and other reporters and vice versa. With the current setting, attempting to do this will only create another slot.
Why do I want this?
There are a number of reasons I want this. Here are some, just to name a few.
1: Custom Logic Gates
What we want:
<> xor <>::custom boolean
The result:
<><> xor <>::custom
2: Trans-Programming Language Blocks (OK this is probably just me)
What we want:
input []::custom reporter
The result:
(input::custom) []::stack custom
The possibilities are just endless with this.
“No support, how are you supposed to toggle it?”
Simple. If you're editing text and you hit the reporter/boolean button, it'll be placed where the cursor is. If not, it'll place it normally.
Edit: I had to change the title so it could be distinguished.
Last edited by CodeComet6161 (Oct. 4, 2025 16:21:57)
- mtaka4
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
I have no idea what you're suggesting
- CodeComet6161
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
I have no idea what you're suggesting
This suggestion is asking for a way to put reporters INSIDE booleans and other reporters and vice versa. With the current setting, attempting to do this will only create another slot.
- CodeComet6161
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
bump
- nembence
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
Is it something like this?
define block with strange input <<> xor <>::custom>
...
block with strange input <xor:a> <xor:b> {
} xor: <> :: customLast edited by nembence (Oct. 8, 2025 22:16:10)
- CodeComet6161
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
Is it something like this?Not the second one.define block with strange input <<> xor <>::custom>
...block with strange input <xor:a> <xor:b> {
} xor: <> :: custom
- mtaka4
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
Oh okI have no idea what you're suggestingThis suggestion is asking for a way to put reporters INSIDE booleans and other reporters and vice versa. With the current setting, attempting to do this will only create another slot.
- CodeComet6161
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
bump
- CodeComet6161
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
bump
- nembence
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
Then I don't know what you wantIs it something like this?Not the second one.define block with strange input <<> xor <>::custom>
...block with strange input <xor:a> <xor:b> {
} xor: <> :: custom
Custom block inputs are usually set outside of the custom block, but if the input also has its own inputs then it needs to send them out of the custom block before it can be set from the outside
- CodeComet6161
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
DOES ANYONE ACTUALLY READ THE TITLE????Then I don't know what you wantIs it something like this?Not the second one.define block with strange input <<> xor <>::custom>
...block with strange input <xor:a> <xor:b> {
} xor: <> :: custom
Custom block inputs are usually set outside of the custom block, but if the input also has its own inputs then it needs to send them out of the custom block before it can be set from the outside
I have no idea what you're suggestingThis suggestion is asking for a way to put reporters INSIDE booleans and other reporters and vice versa. With the current setting, attempting to do this will only create another slot.
- nembence
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
Yes but when you have something like this:DOES ANYONE ACTUALLY READ THE TITLE????…Then I don't know what you want
Custom block inputs are usually set outside of the custom block, but if the input also has its own inputs then it needs to send them out of the custom block before it can be set from the outsideI have no idea what you're suggestingThis suggestion is asking for a way to put reporters INSIDE booleans and other reporters and vice versa. With the current setting, attempting to do this will only create another slot.
define block using the new (input [nested input]) featureWhere does the result of the join block go then?
say (input (join [Hello] (answer)::operators))
Last edited by nembence (Oct. 12, 2025 21:23:42)
- CodeComet6161
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
Hello0Yes but when you have something like this:DOES ANYONE ACTUALLY READ THE TITLE????…Then I don't know what you want
Custom block inputs are usually set outside of the custom block, but if the input also has its own inputs then it needs to send them out of the custom block before it can be set from the outsideI have no idea what you're suggestingThis suggestion is asking for a way to put reporters INSIDE booleans and other reporters and vice versa. With the current setting, attempting to do this will only create another slot.define block using the new (input [nested input]) featureWhere does the result of the join block go then?
say (input (join [Hello] (answer)::operators))
- MiaELamanna
-
Scratcher
35 posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
Bump
- CodeComet6161
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
bump
- TimothyLawyer
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
I don't understand.
This suggestion is asking for a way to put reporters INSIDE booleans and other reporters and vice versa.Can you say this in different words?
- d016
-
Scratcher
95 posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
So do you mean if you have
you can change it into
define cool block (text or number)
you can change it into
define cool block <text or number \(but it's now a boolean!\)>?
Last edited by d016 (Nov. 5, 2025 19:08:20)
- CodeComet6161
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
So do you mean if you havedefine cool block (text or number)
you can change it intodefine cool block <text or number \(but it's now a boolean!\)>?
So do you mean if you havedefine cool block (text or number)
you can change it intodefine cool block <text or number \(but it's now a boolean!\)>?
define text ( reporter input(reporter input::custom))::custom
- dizzyboy42
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]
So do you mean if you haveno they meandefine cool block (text or number)
you can change it intodefine cool block <text or number \(but it's now a boolean!\)>?
define (input [input2])
run (input [input2]) ::fb681
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
-
» Better Custom Blocks THE SECOND SUGGESTION [READ BEFORE REPLYING]