HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

This finale has very ominous implications for of Man of Tomorrow. If

Matjam02 wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

This finale has very ominous implications for of Man of Tomorrow. If

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

What if at the end of the show Rick Flag Jr says “Rick Flag, what a joke” throws his shirt away and wears Peacemakers helmet in his honor

HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

What if at the end of the show Rick Flag Jr says “Rick Flag, what a joke” throws his shirt away and wears Peacemakers helmet in his honor

What if Peacemaker in the finale of his shows says, “Peacemaker, what a joke,” throws his helmet away, and wears Foxy Shazam's shirt in their honor

Magudragon wrote:

No one really talks about anything interesting on here anymore besides “Peacemaker”, I'm unfollowing, I guess DC isn't for me after all.

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

What if at the end of the show Rick Flag Jr says “Rick Flag, what a joke” throws his shirt away and wears Peacemakers helmet in his honor

What if Peacemaker in the finale of his shows says, “Peacemaker, what a joke,” throws his helmet away, and wears Foxy Shazam's shirt in their honor

I really liked the ending but why did I feel like that was an excuse on Gunn’s part to film a rock concert?

HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

What if at the end of the show Rick Flag Jr says “Rick Flag, what a joke” throws his shirt away and wears Peacemakers helmet in his honor

What if Peacemaker in the finale of his shows says, “Peacemaker, what a joke,” throws his helmet away, and wears Foxy Shazam's shirt in their honor

I really liked the ending but why did I feel like that was an excuse on Gunn’s part to film a rock concert?

Because it was.

HexagonWorld wrote:

This finale has very ominous implications for of Man of Tomorrow. If

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

This finale has very ominous implications for of Man of Tomorrow. If

If that makes Gunn one of your least favorite directors, you need to see more movies.

HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

This finale has very ominous implications for of Man of Tomorrow. If

If that makes Gunn one of your least favorite directors, you need to see more movies.

That was mostly a joke, but it would be a terrible decision to not make a Superman character the main antagonist of the Superman movie (I don't care what James Gunn says, it is clearly a Superman sequel).

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

This finale has very ominous implications for of Man of Tomorrow. If

If that makes Gunn one of your least favorite directors, you need to see more movies.

That was mostly a joke, but it would be a terrible decision to not make a Superman character the main antagonist of the Superman movie (I don't care what James Gunn says, it is clearly a Superman sequel).

I agree but thankfully it clearly won’t be Flag. He’ll be a background presence probably but I think we’re getting Braniac or Ultra-Humanite

HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

This finale has very ominous implications for of Man of Tomorrow. If

If that makes Gunn one of your least favorite directors, you need to see more movies.

That was mostly a joke, but it would be a terrible decision to not make a Superman character the main antagonist of the Superman movie (I don't care what James Gunn says, it is clearly a Superman sequel).

I agree but thankfully it clearly won’t be Flag. He’ll be a background presence probably but I think we’re getting Braniac or Ultra-Humanite

PLEASE be Ultra-Humanite, that would be so cool. Also it's a gorilla, gorillas sell.

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

This finale has very ominous implications for of Man of Tomorrow. If

If that makes Gunn one of your least favorite directors, you need to see more movies.

That was mostly a joke, but it would be a terrible decision to not make a Superman character the main antagonist of the Superman movie (I don't care what James Gunn says, it is clearly a Superman sequel).

I agree but thankfully it clearly won’t be Flag. He’ll be a background presence probably but I think we’re getting Braniac or Ultra-Humanite

PLEASE be Ultra-Humanite, that would be so cool. Also it's a gorilla, gorillas sell.

I think Grood will be a major villain going forward but the brain picture on the cover has to mean something.

HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

HexagonWorld wrote:

This finale has very ominous implications for of Man of Tomorrow. If

If that makes Gunn one of your least favorite directors, you need to see more movies.

That was mostly a joke, but it would be a terrible decision to not make a Superman character the main antagonist of the Superman movie (I don't care what James Gunn says, it is clearly a Superman sequel).

I agree but thankfully it clearly won’t be Flag. He’ll be a background presence probably but I think we’re getting Braniac or Ultra-Humanite

PLEASE be Ultra-Humanite, that would be so cool. Also it's a gorilla, gorillas sell.

I think Grood will be a major villain going forward but the brain picture on the cover has to mean something.

The brain is probably the villain with the word ‘brain’ in his name, but Ultra-Humanite would be an inspired choice (The clear best choice is Wallace Shawn as Mxy, though).

Gunn should adapt the part where Ultra-Humanite hired a racketeer to seize control of Metropolis's taxi trade. That part definitely fits well into a modern context.