M0nk3yB00k wrote:

TheKJXD wrote:

bro CODE.org is just pure #### like it wont let kids be free and use imagination like my teacher loves code.org but now I made her make me do scratch

please watch your languege

CatsUnited wrote:

Scratch has a meme community so we win by default

if <thats true> then
say [Real]
end

say [Real]

pippy2011eight wrote:

jkhgn,f dlzj bagel. scratch is better. bagel

scratchboi_2734 wrote:

CatsUnited wrote:

Scratch has a meme community so we win by default

if <thats true> then
say [Real]
end

say [Real]

Code.org is an education innovation nonprofit dedicated to the vision that every student in every school has the opportunity to learn about artificial intelligence (AI) and computer science (CS) as part of their core K-12 education.

Heylazerlips wrote:

I never used Code.org but based on what i've heard there's a built in minecraft thing in there

Code.org is an education innovation nonprofit dedicated to the vision that every student in every school has the opportunity to learn about artificial intelligence (AI) and computer science (CS) as part of their core K-12 education.

kleemiya_the_furball wrote:

DifferentDance8 wrote:

Okay, since my last post was kinda rushed and biased (at that time, I didn't have a code.org account), let me come out with a proper post.

The Editor
Scratch, in my opinion, is more geared towards a DIY mindset. Sure, Scratch has tutorials and such but those “tutorials” are basically just step-by-step guides on how to do the thing you want to do. Code.org, on the other hand, is more geared towards a “externalization” mindset. Major blocks that would normally take tons and tons of blocks and general effort are reduced to one quick block (for example, in the Flappy Bird “guide”, the block for flapping is just

flap a [normal v] amount :: #00b0bc

whereas in Scratch, having something that exact behaviour would require at least 50 blocks and 2 variables)

The Community, or lack thereof
Scratch actually has a community. A large one at that. While code.org does have a way to share projects with the public, the way to access them is complicated (Home -> Projects -> Select “Public Projects”) and even then the age range is wildly off (for example, innocent projects are marked as “18+”).

*coughs* the code.org staff isn't that good (even if they made a bot in which case it would be that they didn't design the bot well) if they rate random, inoccent games 18+

pippy2011eight wrote:

i don't think code.org is a coding website

zephyr12_ wrote:

pippy2011eight wrote:

i don't think code.org is a coding website

Wha-Wai-Hold up-

pippy2011eight wrote:

zephyr12_ wrote:

pippy2011eight wrote:

i don't think code.org is a coding website

Wha-Wai-Hold up-

I remember it being links to other coding websites, I shouuuld have explained better.