yadayadayadagoodbye wrote:

Paddle2See wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

Gamer_Logan819 wrote:

unused do not equal inactive

Sure, but “unused” is a subset of “inactive.” As a result, “deleting unused accounts” is rejected since “deleting inactive accounts” is rejected.

No - I don't think that's how that works. If an account is totally unused (has created nothing on Scratch other than the account) - that's different from an account that has become inactive after being active for some period of time. I personally would not have an issue with removing accounts that had never been active.

Interesting, but how would you know if an account was never “active”? An account has to have been logged in originally (unless its a class account), and so would it be considered active if, say, the owner, after creating it, sent a single comment, or stayed logged in for a week?

Funquat wrote:

I Support but, what if someone just makes private projects and nothing more, could there account be deleted
(King of the page lol)

KingDrover wrote:

Funquat wrote:

I Support but, what if someone just makes private projects and nothing more, could there account be deleted
(King of the page lol)

That still counts as “activity”, since the ST has access to unshared projects.