_IamBored- wrote:

Sweet

Hush, one of the rumored (I think it might’ve been debunked, but I’m talking about him anyway) villains of The Batman Part II, I think would work the best for this interpretation of Batman and Gotham because he matches the sort of grittiness and detective noir vibes of the film, and because he hasn’t (last time I checked) been done before in live action, there isn’t much to compare this version to, which would in theory help with originality and put less pressure on the people working on the film cause there isn’t live action competition.

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

_IamBored- wrote:

Sweet

Hush, one of the rumored (I think it might’ve been debunked, but I’m talking about him anyway) villains of The Batman Part II, I think would work the best for this interpretation of Batman and Gotham because he matches the sort of grittiness and detective noir vibes of the film, and because he hasn’t (last time I checked) been done before in live action, there isn’t much to compare this version to, which would in theory help with originality and put less pressure on the people working on the film cause there isn’t live action competition.

I don't think it's Hush. And as of now most rumors are debunked since according to Gunn only six people know what happens in it.

_IamBored- wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

_IamBored- wrote:

Sweet

Hush, one of the rumored (I think it might’ve been debunked, but I’m talking about him anyway) villains of The Batman Part II, I think would work the best for this interpretation of Batman and Gotham because he matches the sort of grittiness and detective noir vibes of the film, and because he hasn’t (last time I checked) been done before in live action, there isn’t much to compare this version to, which would in theory help with originality and put less pressure on the people working on the film cause there isn’t live action competition.

I don't think it's Hush. And as of now most rumors are debunked since according to Gunn only six people know what happens in it.

Still I think he’d work really well

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

Here's the top 3 brainiac choices (in my opinion)

Peter Capaldi
Chukwudi Iwuji
Michael Emerson

ElectricActionGames wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

Here's the top 3 brainiac choices (in my opinion)

Peter Capaldi
Chukwudi Iwuji
Michael Emerson

YES
No, because Peacemaker
No, just no

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

ElectricActionGames wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

Here's the top 3 brainiac choices (in my opinion)

Peter Capaldi
Chukwudi Iwuji
Michael Emerson

YES
No, because Peacemaker
No, just no

Gunn has said that Murns face might not be canon. And said he wants to bring back Iwuji and could do it under heavy make-up.
Why not?

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

Here's the top 3 brainiac choices (in my opinion)

Peter Capaldi
Chukwudi Iwuji
Michael Emerson

ElectricActionGames wrote:

1. “Okay so this sentence is canon but that face isn't and this text message is but that joke isn't and that scene is but that other scene isn't-”-James Gunn
2. I just don't see it.

Matjam02 wrote:

Platypus_WKeyboard wrote:

Here's the top 3 brainiac choices (in my opinion)

Peter Capaldi
Chukwudi Iwuji
Michael Emerson

Matthew Macfadyen
Michael Rosenbaum

Magudragon wrote:

So is The Teen Titans Go Vs Teen Titans movie any good?
I don't really know what else to talk about here, since I'm not into DC much, and I've been binge-watching both shows.

Magudragon wrote:

So is The Teen Titans Go Vs Teen Titans movie any good?
I don't really know what else to talk about here, since I'm not into DC much, and I've been binge-watching both shows.

ElectricActionGames wrote:

Magudragon wrote:

So is The Teen Titans Go Vs Teen Titans movie any good?
I don't really know what else to talk about here, since I'm not into DC much, and I've been binge-watching both shows.

Teen Titans Go is slop, Temu Gumball. Original Teen Titans is peak storytelling. The movie is just meh.