No support. This could be very, very bad for those who make projects based on banned fandoms that they don’t know are banned and the second they post a second project relating to that fandom. Dead. Their account is 6 feet underground permanently asleep. That would be extremely unfair and could cause a lot of backlash.

Scratch_Cat_Coder8 wrote:

No support. This could be very, very bad for those who make projects based on banned fandoms that they don’t know are banned and the second they post a second project relating to that fandom. Dead. Their account is 6 feet underground permanently asleep. That would be extremely unfair and could cause a lot of backlash.

I know right? They should use this system in my reply instead: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/543578/?page=1#post-8665108

SMG4fan7236 wrote:

REJECT. THIS. IDEA. NOW. Seriously, only ONE warning, what if people receive multiple at once? They may be banned in just one click! And even if they didn’t receive that much in one go, at least a few extra warnings would be more sufficient, and don’t count warnings that went onto the account in the same time period, and instead of one, maybe like at least three to five before banned. I give ZERO support on this.

I’m guessing this suggesstion implies banning only if the warnings have been in a very short amount of time.

Try to find a single scratcher who hasn't been warned once. It is very difficult. Half of the people on this site would be gone at the drop of a hat.

me_hungry_want_pizza wrote:

I've seen a lot of ad-ers and people who break the rules which turned scratch into a war zone, so how about make it so you only get 1 warning before getting banned? That'll teach people a lesson

Edit: other than the muted one

what about somewhat passive aggressive forum posts, i have made a few of them and recieved a warning for each. i don't want to be banned

No support. What if you violated two completely different rules? Would you get banned after violating the second one? You shouldn't get only one warning.

SockAlternative wrote:

Try to find a single scratcher who hasn't been warned once. It is very difficult. Half of the people on this site would be gone at the drop of a hat.

Me

There is already a more nuanced system in place where some situations result in an immediate block but others are only a first warning.