Discuss Scratch

Little_Mittle12345
Scratcher
100+ posts

The Opposite of the Join Block

coincidenceithink wrote:

mitdk wrote:

Also,
(delete letter () of []::operators)
here's a workaround though
define delete letter (ltr) of (word)
delete (all v) of [ltrs v]
repeat (length of (word))
add (letter (length of [ltrs v] ::list) of (word)) to [ltrs v]
end
delete (ltr) of [ltrs v]
set [result v] to []
repeat (length of [ltrs v] :: list)
set [result v] to (join (result) (item (length of (result) + (1) ::operators) of [ltrs v] :: list))
end
support for the original because this would be helpful for decoding and other stuff and the workaround is a bit long especially for new scratchers
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/179531/?page=2#post-4357779 dupe.
Kitten-da-Cat
Scratcher
1000+ posts

The Opposite of the Join Block

Little_Mittle12345 wrote:

coincidenceithink wrote:

mitdk wrote:

Also,
(delete letter () of []::operators)
here's a workaround though
define delete letter (ltr) of (word)
delete (all v) of [ltrs v]
repeat (length of (word))
add (letter (length of [ltrs v] ::list) of (word)) to [ltrs v]
end
delete (ltr) of [ltrs v]
set [result v] to []
repeat (length of [ltrs v] :: list)
set [result v] to (join (result) (item (length of (result) + (1) ::operators) of [ltrs v] :: list))
end
support for the original because this would be helpful for decoding and other stuff and the workaround is a bit long especially for new scratchers
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/179531/?page=2#post-4357779 dupe.
Youre a dupe ur hddhdhdhhd
cs3868895
Scratcher
1000+ posts

The Opposite of the Join Block

Kitten-da-Cat wrote:

Little_Mittle12345 wrote:

coincidenceithink wrote:

mitdk wrote:

Also,
(delete letter () of []::operators)
here's a workaround though
define delete letter (ltr) of (word)
delete (all v) of [ltrs v]
repeat (length of (word))
add (letter (length of [ltrs v] ::list) of (word)) to [ltrs v]
end
delete (ltr) of [ltrs v]
set [result v] to []
repeat (length of [ltrs v] :: list)
set [result v] to (join (result) (item (length of (result) + (1) ::operators) of [ltrs v] :: list))
end
support for the original because this would be helpful for decoding and other stuff and the workaround is a bit long especially for new scratchers
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/179531/?page=2#post-4357779 dupe.
Youre a dupe ur hddhdhdhhd

I don't want a workaround, How was I supposed to know?

Support, I actually like this idea of having it as an operator, saves time and useful for code.
rodper6635
Scratcher
100+ posts

The Opposite of the Join Block

Support, useful when you only need certain parts of a string.
diepipis
Scratcher
100+ posts

The Opposite of the Join Block

Support!
I don’t need it (I think) but the situations presented in this topic are pretty convincing!
+1
thedolphin_
Scratcher
100+ posts

The Opposite of the Join Block

Support.
dizzyboy42
Scratcher
500+ posts

The Opposite of the Join Block

VERY much support
mingo-gag
Scratcher
1000+ posts

The Opposite of the Join Block

thedolphin_ wrote:

Support.

dizzyboy42 wrote:

VERY much support
Plz explain why you support

Powered by DjangoBB