Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
- Saftreb
-
Scratcher
23 posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Dear developers,
For the next update I would have a suggestion: I think it would be a good thing to implement PI into “Operators”, if that is possible.
Scratchy creatings
Saftreb
For the next update I would have a suggestion: I think it would be a good thing to implement PI into “Operators”, if that is possible.

Scratchy creatings
Saftreb
- Theismann
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Dear developers,PI? Not sure what that means? Possible Inputs?
For the next update I would have a suggestion: I think it would be a good thing to implement PI into “Operators”, if that is possible.
Scratchy creatings
Saftreb
- gdpr533f604550b2f20900645890
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Pi is the ratio of the circumference to the diameter of a circle. It is often approximated to 3.14, but in reality does not terminate.Dear developers,PI? Not sure what that means? Possible Inputs?
For the next update I would have a suggestion: I think it would be a good thing to implement PI into “Operators”, if that is possible.
Scratchy creatings
Saftreb
Last edited by gdpr533f604550b2f20900645890 (March 12, 2015 22:28:36)
- Saftreb
-
Scratcher
23 posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Sorry, of course I meant this “Pi” of mathematics, usually shown using the Greek letter! 
Saftreb

Saftreb
- CatsUnited
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Support, but there's a workaround, it's just a little bit hard to remember if you're not very good at it.
- ev3commander
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Also e. Phi would be good too but would be just (1+sqrt5)/2.
- TheHockeyist
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Support, but workaroundable. It is hard for some people to remember those digits, so… support.
- peppermintpatty5
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
(π::operators)It would be cool. Support, I guess.
- Theismann
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Support, but workaroundable. It is hard for some people to remember those digits, so… support.
Support. Also, I like your signatures(π::operators)It would be cool. Support, I guess.
- Braeden5454
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
22/7 usually works unless you are doing very precise measurements.
- CatsUnited
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Also e. Phi would be good too but would be just (1+sqrt5)/2.
([e^ v] of (1))Simple
- TheHockeyist
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
22/7 usually works unless you are doing very precise measurements.
22/7 is inaccurate!!! Pi is not 3.142857…! It's 3.14159…! Use 355/113 if you want to be more precise (credit to the ancient Chinese).
Last edited by TheHockeyist (March 13, 2015 14:01:27)
- Theismann
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Your right22/7 usually works unless you are doing very precise measurements.
22/7 is inaccurate!!! Pi is not 3.142857…! It's 3.14159…! Use 355/113 if you want to be more precise (credit to the ancient Chinese).
- ealgase
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Support:
(pi::operators)
- matey1234
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Semi-support..
Funfact: Pi Day is on July 22nd in Australia.
Funfact: Pi Day is on July 22nd in Australia.
- GyroscopeBill
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Support, but for now you can use rough fractions or remember as many digits of it as you choose.
- Letsgopitt
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Support, but it technically would never be accurate because for the computer to compute it it must make it terminate at some point.
- The_Scratch_Squad
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Support! It would be very simple to use… Like a pi demonstration program using circumference…
- ShinySkarmory227
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Support, but it technically would never be accurate because for the computer to compute it it must make it terminate at some point.They could just use the first few digits. Rounding exists for a reason.XD
- TheHockeyist
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Implementing of PI (3.141.....) into "Operators"
Yeah… I use 3.14159265358979 whenever I need pi.













