BigNate469 wrote:

Given this (which was linked earlier in the topic), it sounds like Sprunki pretty much isn't allowed anymore at all.

If that is the case, then why implement this suggestion?

coder2310 wrote:

bump

define Add to the filter

ewo999z wrote:

Seriously, we have to add to the filter

define Add to the filter

marketable-plush wrote:

I think they should add an age filter I guess idk

coder2310 wrote:

BigNate469 wrote:

Given this (which was linked earlier in the topic), it sounds like Sprunki pretty much isn't allowed anymore at all.

If that is the case, then why implement this suggestion?

Oh, um… Because this would stop sprinki project from getting on the front page and search bar COMPLETLY. The ST can't ban sprunki project immediatly, so some kids may still see them beforehand. Also they normally hang on the trending page for a bit, so there'll still be the disturbing thumbnails. And sometimes they stay on the trending page COMPLETELY unbanned. Like that one project that stayed first for FIVE DAYS!

Simply put: implementing this would stop ALL these problems, and make things less of a hassle for the ST

BigNate469 wrote:

My point was that if it's blanket-banned anyways, the ST shouldn't be NFE'ing Sprunki projects, they should be taking them down.

coder2310 wrote:

ewo999z wrote:

Seriously, we have to add to the filter

define Add to the filter

It's honestly nuts! I mean for, like, a MONTH now ALL we've had is sprunki projects! Now half the page is just banned -or not banned- sprunki horror projects! And the other half is random japanese projects and animations that have ALSO been banned!

BigNate469 wrote:

coder2310 wrote:

BigNate469 wrote:

Given this (which was linked earlier in the topic), it sounds like Sprunki pretty much isn't allowed anymore at all.

If that is the case, then why implement this suggestion?

Oh, um… Because this would stop sprinki project from getting on the front page and search bar COMPLETLY. The ST can't ban sprunki project immediatly, so some kids may still see them beforehand. Also they normally hang on the trending page for a bit, so there'll still be the disturbing thumbnails. And sometimes they stay on the trending page COMPLETELY unbanned. Like that one project that stayed first for FIVE DAYS!

Simply put: implementing this would stop ALL these problems, and make things less of a hassle for the ST

BigNate469 wrote:

My point was that if it's blanket-banned anyways, the ST shouldn't be NFE'ing Sprunki projects, they should be taking them down.

Tablet_TheManHimself wrote:

Here's the problem… Some Sprunki games that are on the server right now removed the gore, so if somebody wants to play sprunki, they would have to look at a sketchy website or something along those lines.

BigNate469 wrote:

My point was that if it's blanket-banned anyways, the ST shouldn't be NFE'ing Sprunki projects, they should be taking them down.

MagicCoder330 wrote:

I'm going to be frank. Sprunki is bad yet it is still being rocketed to the top of trending on a daily basis, exposing children to the gore and scary images in it. I propose that this gets added to the NFE filter, similar to how “FNAF” was (due to a similar scary project incident). It should also be search blacklisted (searching it just immediately results in nothing found).

As for the occasional project that isn't breaking the community guidelines, I feel like similar to FNAF, most projects associated with Sprunki are too inappropriate to risk it.

for those that are not familiar with the scary project policy, here is a link to it: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/168506/