above and watch this video and this video

No, Scratchfoundarion.org says:
Scratch is a creative alternative to today's consumer-driven social media.
Scratch is is a programming langauge, not a social media.
Scratch is used in schools, without it, kids must use bad scartch ripoff like Tynker, Blocky, or text based programming langauges.

I honestly doubt it.

The bill itself defines “social media” as:

Kids Off Social Media Act wrote:

(6) SOCIAL MEDIAL PLATFORM.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The term “social media platform” means a public-facing website, online service, online application, or mobile application that—

(i) is directed to consumers;

(ii) collects personal data;

(iii) primarily derives revenue from advertising or the sale of personal data; and

(iv) as its primary function provides a community forum for user-generated content, including messages, videos, and audio files among users where such content is primarily intended for viewing, resharing, or platform-enabled distributed social endorsement or comment.

(B) LIMITATION.—The term “social medial platform” does not include a platform that, as its primary function for consumers, provides or facilitates any of the following:

(…)

(viii) Educational information, experiences, training, or instruction provided to build knowledge, skills, or a craft, district-sanctioned or school-sanctioned learning management systems and school information systems for the purposes of schools conveying content related to the education of students, or services on behalf of or in support of an elementary school or secondary school, as such terms are defined in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).

Scratch already doesn't meet the requirements to be considered social media as defined here, because A iii isn't true, and B viii is true.

For that matter, Roblox doesn't either, as it provides the playing and creation of video games (which I chose to cut out here, as it isn't immediately relevant to Scratch, although I guess it does still apply), which is one of the exceptions listed in part B.

I'm also not really certain how much this act will do, even if it is signed into law- COPPA forbids the sale of kids' personal info, and what do social media companies do about it? Add a thing while you're signing up to select your age and never verify that. They can just keep doing that and claiming that they're doing their best with their millions of users.

(EDIT: Ninja'd by 1/2 min and 6s.)
Let's actually see some of the bill before we guess.

As we can see here under definitions…

(B) LIMITATION.—The term “social medial platform” does not include a platform that, as its primary function for consumers, provides or facilitates any of the following:
(iv) Cloud storage, file sharing, or file collaboration services, including such services that allow collaborative editing by invited users.
(v) The playing or creation of video games.

“any of the following” = If any of these are met, it's not to be counted as one.
These two (b(4) & b(5) seems to apply atleast - You can collab by remixing, and you're not altering anyone that isn't on that collab's version - So I'd argue it counts.) apply.
We can argue that since Scratch literally allows you to make and play games or similar, we can tick that off the list.
That's 2 that basically means Scratch wouldn't be countable as a social media.
And down 3 points:

(viii) Educational information, experiences, training, or instruction provided to build knowledge, skills, or a craft, district-sanctioned or school-sanctioned learning management systems and school information systems for the purposes of schools conveying content related to the education of students, or services on behalf of or in support of an elementary school or secondary school, as such terms are defined in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).

Unless my legalese is horrifyingly bad, Scratch meets points b(4, 5, 8).
There is no personalization on this site, so we can scratch a lot of this article out.
I don't exactly have a good amount of sleep right now so I can't go over most of it as I'd likely start to misunderstand a lot of part.

you know how i feel about CIPA?

i feel like that about COPPA as well. ruining 13/18th of someones childhood is not very good.

cake__5 wrote:

(#5)
you know how i feel about CIPA?

i feel like that about COPPA as well. ruining 13/18th of someones childhood is not very good.

I wouldn't say it's ruining. It's not good for people under 13 to be on these sites. Also, 13/18 isn't correct.

You can use the site as soon as you're 13. So it's actually 12/18 (2/3). However, no one has an urge for these sites until let's say at least 9. So really just 3/18 or 1/6 of someones childhood. Even further it's still super dramatic to say it's ruining childhoods.

scratch is for kids and for all ages,and the scratch team will not ban kids accounts (and teacher accounts that create kids account)

i sayed chatgpt ¿scratch meets COPPA? and chatgpt sayed yes
i used google translate for this quote

fun-scratcher45 wrote:

(#8)
i sayed chatgpt ¿scratch meets COPPA? and chatgpt sayed yes

In this case, ChatGPT may have misinformed you; Scratch doesn't need to comply with COPPA, since the Scratch Foundation is non-profit.