cake__5 wrote:

-2147483647
yay your suggestion has the most negative support EVER!

anyway, banning sprunki is a bad idea, because if you ban sprunki, something very, very bad will happen

cake__5 wrote:

-2147483647
yay your suggestion has the most negative support EVER!

anyway, banning sprunki is a bad idea, because if you ban sprunki, something very, very bad will happen

canarycat2000 wrote:

cake__5 wrote:

-2147483647
yay your suggestion has the most negative support EVER!

anyway, banning sprunki is a bad idea, because if you ban sprunki, something very, very bad will happen

One thing for sure, you'll screw over the fans who make more innocent content, and you'll get a ton of backlash.

I had to hastily change my icon out of fear for this potential ban(Brud, nooooooooo), and I keep forgetting the person with the Pocatello icon is meant to be me.

cake__5 wrote:

-snip-

you know who else scratch screwed over?

the innocent fn‍af content creators

MudkipKappa wrote:

Umhead22 wrote:

1THEKINGBOB3 wrote:

Umhead22 wrote:

canarycat2000 wrote:

Vehemently not supporting this.

Why? Think back to FNAF, it caused a major fiasco, with some people calling to ban the game altogether.
A blanket ban here would be unfair for the FNAF fans that just make innocent projects with little(if any) ties to the darker aspects.
The ST settled on banning FNAF projects that replicate the darker aspects, but leave the more innocent ones(i.e. a Freddy Fazbear dress up game). You also can't search ‘FNAF’ in the searchbar.

Something similar could happen to Sprunki, while it may take care of the darker projects, will also unfairly affect the more innocent ones(i.e. a drawing of Brud and OWAKCX playing cards). I vote NFE-ing it at most.

(yes, this is biased, I'm sure you can tell. But still…)

I still disagree with ST of banning fnaf, but Sprunki is other stuff. I have searched “sprunki” and projects that I have played had the inopproproate stuff more than fan-stuff, even on thumbnails (some are banned, but still thumbnails of it exists). There will be people who will protest, but the fact that there's bloody stuff out there, breaking guideliness, ignore?

If somebody drowns in water, should we not drink water?
In Canary's posts, it says that it will also unfairly affect the more innocent ones. Consider this before anything else.

Fnaf had also good stuff

Thus, Fnaf isn't banned.

Cool_kid092 wrote:

is sprunki even a franchise???
also if this happens i think only the horror versions should be taken down
edit: king o page

Umhead22 wrote:

Try to search fnaf

hydrofungus wrote:

Umhead22 wrote:

Try to search fnaf

the term “FNAF” is NFE'd (nfe meaning Not For Everyone)
it wont show fnaf projects in search but content relating to it is still allowed

Umhead22 wrote:

hydrofungus wrote:

Umhead22 wrote:

Try to search fnaf

the term “FNAF” is NFE'd (nfe meaning Not For Everyone)
it wont show fnaf projects in search but content relating to it is still allowed

it will be same as sprunki, you can make, but it won't appear in search or smth like that

JakubMzTrencina wrote:

Support, ST should ban Sprunki instead of marking it as NFE, and here's also why.
If Sprunki gets NFE'd rather than banned, one can still seek Sprunki projects via Google using the site search parameter. Thus, one may stumble upon an inappropriate Sprunki project via a search engine, as marking a project NFE on Scratch doesn't prevent Google's engine from indexing & displaying it in search results.

hydrofungus wrote:

(#34)

JakubMzTrencina wrote:

Support, ST should ban Sprunki instead of marking it as NFE, and here's also why.
If Sprunki gets NFE'd rather than banned, one can still seek Sprunki projects via Google using the site search parameter. Thus, one may stumble upon an inappropriate Sprunki project via a search engine, as marking a project NFE on Scratch doesn't prevent Google's engine from indexing & displaying it in search results.

say that to other nfe’d franchises then

Umhead22 wrote:

This post is re-writed, because ppl starting to say that this is rejected:
Guys, so this post shouldn't be deleted, I will use word “Body stuff” instead of describing thing, okay?
Is it rejected?

Official rejected list wrote:

3.3 Ban certain franchises
Generally, the Scratch Team does not censor projects based on a certain franchise unless a large number of inappropriate projects were made with the franchise. An example is Five Nights at Freddy's; see this announcement for more information. In general, it is usually possible to make appropriate projects based on a certain franchise. Of course, you should always report inappropriate projects of any kind.

though you huys skipped the first sentence

What you missed... wrote:

Generally, the Scratch Team does not censor projects based on a certain franchise unless a large number of inappropriate projects were made with the franchise.

So this is not working.

Why sprunki should be banned?
Because of the inoppropriate stuff like red liquid in the body, stuff inside body and etc. You will say there is also safe and good content, but it's similar to fnaf, there's was also good stuff but it is still banned. Sprunki projects are getting banned because of reports and that's good, but it's not helping as you can see. You can still make them tho, but it won't show up

Projects examples:
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/1102960722/
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/1101415477/
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/1082583300/
and more…

right now, there is not much, but because of popularity and fandom of sprunki, there will be appear more and more body stuff on Sprunki.

Why some projects aren't reported by scratcher's?
Because it's popular and kids like Sprunki, they won't report on their favorite franchise game, even if there is bodys stuff, you guys should already know how kids are.

It will affect on safe Sprunki content
It is true, but… There isn't much, If you search sprunki, you will have an OC or maker stuff and many, many copy paste of sprunki. It won't affect much on fan-content

A warning!
I'm not tellong to ban NyankoBfLol or something, only sprunki because of it stuff

Umhead22 wrote:

MudkipKappa wrote:

Umhead22 wrote:

1THEKINGBOB3 wrote:

Umhead22 wrote:

canarycat2000 wrote:

Vehemently not supporting this.

Why? Think back to FNAF, it caused a major fiasco, with some people calling to ban the game altogether.
A blanket ban here would be unfair for the FNAF fans that just make innocent projects with little(if any) ties to the darker aspects.
The ST settled on banning FNAF projects that replicate the darker aspects, but leave the more innocent ones(i.e. a Freddy Fazbear dress up game). You also can't search ‘FNAF’ in the searchbar.

Something similar could happen to Sprunki, while it may take care of the darker projects, will also unfairly affect the more innocent ones(i.e. a drawing of Brud and OWAKCX playing cards). I vote NFE-ing it at most.

(yes, this is biased, I'm sure you can tell. But still…)

I still disagree with ST of banning fnaf, but Sprunki is other stuff. I have searched “sprunki” and projects that I have played had the inopproproate stuff more than fan-stuff, even on thumbnails (some are banned, but still thumbnails of it exists). There will be people who will protest, but the fact that there's bloody stuff out there, breaking guideliness, ignore?

If somebody drowns in water, should we not drink water?
In Canary's posts, it says that it will also unfairly affect the more innocent ones. Consider this before anything else.

Fnaf had also good stuff

Thus, Fnaf isn't banned.

Try to search fnaf

dollar2022 wrote:

Hello there I am going to report this suggestion as it is using a older suggestion and it is rejected

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/792288/

3.3 Ban certain franchises
Generally, the Scratch Team does not censor projects based on a certain franchise unless a large number of inappropriate projects were made with the franchise. An example is Five Nights at Freddy's; see this announcement for more information. In general, it is usually possible to make appropriate projects based on a certain franchise. Of course, you should always report inappropriate projects of any kind.

pursuiter wrote:

dollar2022 wrote:

Hello there I am going to report this suggestion as it is using a older suggestion and it is rejected

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/792288/

It's closed and it is NOT rejected.

3.3 Ban certain franchises
Generally, the Scratch Team does not censor projects based on a certain franchise unless a large number of inappropriate projects were made with the franchise. An example is Five Nights at Freddy's; see this announcement for more information. In general, it is usually possible to make appropriate projects based on a certain franchise. Of course, you should always report inappropriate projects of any kind.

the mod who closed the topic wrote:

Closing as rejected/resolved since the content you detailed breaks our existing guidelines and can be reported as usual.