helloagain_57 wrote:

doggy_boi1 wrote:

helloagain_57 wrote:

SpyCoderX wrote:

helloagain_57 wrote:

jmdzti_0-0 wrote:

helloagain_57 wrote:

BigNate469 wrote:

amagamecode wrote:

Starman99 wrote:

Snip

Well, I also want this block because it also helps us a lot.

if <>, bounce :: motion stack 

But if it's not touching something, then Scratch can't know what to bounce off of. It's literally impossible to make that block.

Just make the sprite flip.

it's not the same.

It's literally the thing that would happen. Anything else would not make sense.

Workaround:

if <> then
turn cw (180) degrees
end

Or

if <> then
point in direction ((direction)+(180))
end

Workarounds are not fun.

this hardly even counts as a workaround. This is literally just a block. we don't need a designated flip or turn 180* block because that already exists

then quote spycoder

doggy_boi1 wrote:

helloagain_57 wrote:

doggy_boi1 wrote:

helloagain_57 wrote:

SpyCoderX wrote:

helloagain_57 wrote:

jmdzti_0-0 wrote:

helloagain_57 wrote:

BigNate469 wrote:

amagamecode wrote:

Starman99 wrote:

Snip

Well, I also want this block because it also helps us a lot.

if <>, bounce :: motion stack 

But if it's not touching something, then Scratch can't know what to bounce off of. It's literally impossible to make that block.

Just make the sprite flip.

it's not the same.

It's literally the thing that would happen. Anything else would not make sense.

Workaround:

if <> then
turn cw (180) degrees
end

Or

if <> then
point in direction ((direction)+(180))
end

Workarounds are not fun.

this hardly even counts as a workaround. This is literally just a block. we don't need a designated flip or turn 180* block because that already exists

then quote spycoder

?? wdym

helloagain_57 wrote:

(#178)

doggy_boi1 wrote:

helloagain_57 wrote:

-snip-

?? wdym

yeah he started considering it as a workaround

doggy_boi1 wrote:

(#175)
we don't need a designated flip or turn 180* block because that already exists

SpyCoderX wrote:

helloagain_57 wrote:

(#178)

doggy_boi1 wrote:

helloagain_57 wrote:

-snip-

?? wdym

yeah he started considering it as a workaround

I made a workaround that mimics your suggestion exactly.

doggy_boi1 said that my workaround is barely a workaround since its so simple, and that the suggested block isn't needed because its so simple.

doggy_boi1 wrote:

(#175)
we don't need a designated flip or turn 180* block because that already exists

You (helloagain_57) thought that he (doggy_boi1) meant my workaround wasn't a valid workaround and that it should be discounted, which isn't what he was saying.

(Correct me if I'm wrong)

I hope this helps to clear things up.

mikey_la_magicien wrote:

what if, a sprite is touching the edge of the screen and we want it to hide or delete itself, then what do we do? because i am trying to fix a podracer game i made, but when the rock reaches the edge, it waits a second or two and then it deletes itself. but i can't seem to get it to work.


here is the link to the game:

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/395765011/

if <touching [edge v] ?> then
hide
end

Starman99 wrote:

I really want a block that is JUST like the "if touching edge, bounce" block that is able to work when you touch ANY sprite, to make it simpler for more basic users to have things bounce on each other.

if touching (sprite1 v) then bounce:: motion

trolley_explodes wrote:

Starman99 wrote:

I really want a block that is JUST like the "if touching edge, bounce" block that is able to work when you touch ANY sprite, to make it simpler for more basic users to have things bounce on each other.

So like this?

if touching (sprite1 v) then bounce:: motion

amagamecode wrote:

trolley_explodes wrote:

Starman99 wrote:

I really want a block that is JUST like the "if touching edge, bounce" block that is able to work when you touch ANY sprite, to make it simpler for more basic users to have things bounce on each other.

So like this?

if touching (sprite1 v) then bounce:: motion

Everyone knows that

if touching clone of [myself v], bounce ::motion

unknown2467 wrote:

After 10 pages, this is a duplicate.