Emeraldore12 wrote:

This is alright except for ONE BIG PROBLEM!

Scratch may become blocked on school devices for its use of AI. It has been on the verge of being blocked for so long because kids mostly use it for games instead of coding, but now it will most likely get blocked because school admins HATE AI being used in schools even if it is told not to give whole answers and not solves somebodies' math homework. If this happens, I (and many others) will be absolutely devastated.

Although the post is great!

SpyCoderX wrote:

Emeraldore12 wrote:

This is alright except for ONE BIG PROBLEM!

Scratch may become blocked on school devices for its use of AI. It has been on the verge of being blocked for so long because kids mostly use it for games instead of coding, but now it will most likely get blocked because school admins HATE AI being used in schools even if it is told not to give whole answers and not solves somebodies' math homework. If this happens, I (and many others) will be absolutely devastated.

Although the post is great!

I see your point.

But I have to ask: What happens AI is integrated (added) to everything?

It’s coming slowly, but AI is making a big impact on many apps and companies. (If we don’t get destroyed by AI first) everything will eventually have AI integrated into it.

The goal for scratch should be to find a way to implement AI without compromising the goals of scratch. (Teach children to code, be safe for kids, etc.)

scratchcode1_2_3 wrote:

ive been really busy these days so i wont be able to add stuff to the demo lol, but bump ig

bump

_-duckies-_ wrote:

Support.

I don't get why people are thinking this will defeat the purpose of coding, it's just basically like teachers. Teachers in schools teach students how to do stuff, not telling them the answers, just telling them how to figure out the answer. This is just the same as what the AI is doing, teaching people how coding works. If this AI teaching stuff is bad, then surely teachers in schools would be bad.

Emeraldore12 wrote:

The goal for scratch should be to find a way to implement AI without compromising the goals of scratch. (Teach children to code, be safe for kids, etc.)

astro-peach wrote:

(#229)
Schools hate AI

astro-peach wrote:

(#229)
not a bot that probably can't explain the logic of it clearly

astro-peach wrote:

(#229)
people already have extremely strong feelings about AI art, saying that it “steals artists' work to train itself”

astro-peach wrote:

(#229)
slammed just for using other people's art as inspiration,

astro-peach wrote:

(#229)
at proportion includes people who hate AI. AI art is frowned upon slammed just for using other people's art as inspiration, Scratchers will hate this for making it easier to make complex projects, thus kind of decreasing the respect there is for people who put time and effort into their projects, when ‘everyone can do it’- and easily so.

scratchcode1_2_3 wrote:

I appreciate your time for writing this, but I feel like you're still misunderstanding.

astro-peach wrote:

(#229)
Schools hate AI

This is the only fair point.

astro-peach wrote:

(#229)
not a bot that probably can't explain the logic of it clearly

Which it in fact can. Have you even tried it? Is it down again, or are you confused on what chatbot I mean instead of just going to the original, non-prompted AI?

astro-peach wrote:

(#229)
people already have extremely strong feelings about AI art, saying that it “steals artists' work to train itself”

Yes, but this isn't about AI art and I literally was against it in THE OP

astro-peach wrote:

(#229)
slammed just for using other people's art as inspiration,

Again, this isn't about AI art.

astro-peach wrote:

(#229)
at proportion includes people who hate AI. AI art is frowned upon slammed just for using other people's art as inspiration, Scratchers will hate this for making it easier to make complex projects, thus kind of decreasing the respect there is for people who put time and effort into their projects, when ‘everyone can do it’- and easily so.

But people should in fact learn how to do complex things. This feels like you want people to keep making simple stuff. This is about learning. Not the AI giving you the whole entire code, such as stax.fun which I am against. It's about explaining the things as I have mentioned so many times in this thread. It does not just give you the code. It is not meant to just give you the code. It can't make the project for you.

tottsmc wrote:

(#231)

scratchcode1_2_3 wrote:

-snip-

yeh I think a ai would help new scratchers!

SpyCoderX wrote:

tottsmc wrote:

(#231)

scratchcode1_2_3 wrote:

-snip-

yeh I think a ai would help new scratchers!

Why / how? Please explain.

Thanks!

DebbyBebby09 wrote:

I think ai art is okay, it just has to be known that the art is ai and that the person using the art has no credit on the art whatsoever, even if they made the prompt.

MagicCoder330 wrote:

(interesting thing I found out. If you give it the list of blocks from the OP it actually can accurately code many things). I could see it having some merit, again if it was heavily moderated. also, it starts getting a bit… I dunno, scatterbrained? after it has been talking for a while. Just a note.

scratchcode1_2_3 wrote:

MagicCoder330 wrote:

(interesting thing I found out. If you give it the list of blocks from the OP it actually can accurately code many things). I could see it having some merit, again if it was heavily moderated. also, it starts getting a bit… I dunno, scatterbrained? after it has been talking for a while. Just a note.

Hm what? The (un)official demo by me is currently down since the api is dead, I will update the api to the new one so you can test thr full prompt yourself! Yay

scratchcode1_2_3 wrote:

MagicCoder330 wrote:

(interesting thing I found out. If you give it the list of blocks from the OP it actually can accurately code many things). I could see it having some merit, again if it was heavily moderated. also, it starts getting a bit… I dunno, scatterbrained? after it has been talking for a while. Just a note.

Hm what? The (un)official demo by me is currently down since the api is dead, I will update the api to the new one so you can test thr full prompt yourself! Yay

1THEKINGBOB3 wrote:

scratchcode1_2_3 wrote:

MagicCoder330 wrote:

(interesting thing I found out. If you give it the list of blocks from the OP it actually can accurately code many things). I could see it having some merit, again if it was heavily moderated. also, it starts getting a bit… I dunno, scatterbrained? after it has been talking for a while. Just a note.

Hm what? The (un)official demo by me is currently down since the api is dead, I will update the api to the new one so you can test thr full prompt yourself! Yay

Ok, I used your instructions on a custom gpt Maker and this is what happened.