ocular has a bunch of results for “eaglercraft” in TIRAP
and 90% of them are spam posts

?

(#5)
if it's rude. support.
if it's not rude. no support / semi support.

crazyfrogcat wrote:

(#3)
if it's rude. support.
if it's not rude. no support / semi support.

it's spam

8to16 wrote:

(#4)

crazyfrogcat wrote:

(#3)
if it's rude. support.
if it's not rude. no support / semi support.

it's spam

now full support

Is it inappropriate if yes support
If no no support

zeldatheaxolotl wrote:

(#6)
Is it inappropriate if yes support
If no no support

but its spam and the scratch team doesn't allow it. to see the rule click here!!

No support I understand that there's crazy spam with the eaglecraft.com link
But that doesn't mean the ST shouldn't ban it completely
Just report it or use Contact Us or something

Because Scratchers still think that Scratch is 1984
they will start hating on scratch team for censoring a site
they use often no matter the reason

and an announcement won’t change a Scratcher’s mind
cuz they don’t know what forums are

this is my explanation on what will happen
and if there are lots of spam posts then
you report or use Contact Us

gdfsgdfsgdfg wrote:

(#9)
Because Scratchers still think that Scratch is 1984
they will start hating on scratch team for censoring a site
they use often no matter the reason

and an announcement won’t change a Scratcher’s mind
cuz they don’t know what forums are

this is my explanation on what will happen
and if there are lots of spam posts then
you report or use Contact Us

but eaglercraft is a pirate

Please censor the name as it breaks minecraft's TOS. For that same reason, i support.

jmdzti_0-0 wrote:

Please censor the name as it breaks minecraft's TOS. For that same reason, i support.

I have nothing against censoring this, but your logic confuses me. Should we ban adblcokers because they go against Youtube's TOS? When did other websites TOSes begin to matter?

zero support. eaglercraft makes minecraft accessible to the poor, the parents dont want to buy them any games, the “oops! using the wrong os!”, and the bored kids at school who have nothing to do with their time.

again, as elijah999999 pointed out, who cares about other TOSes? scratches TOS is the only one we should be worried about.

cake__5 wrote:

-snip-

but they are spamming it in the scratch forums and sending links and remember what the community guidelines said:

Scratch Communty Guidelines wrote:

Be Safe: keep personal and contact information private.
For safety reasons, don't give out any information that could be used for private communication, in person or online.

This includes sharing real last names, phone numbers, addresses, hometowns, school names, email addresses, usernames or links to social media sites, video chatting applications, or websites with private chat functionality.

They are sending links to sites and remember eaglercraft you can chat in it. so obviously they should ban it. And Scratch has a rule where you can't share websites with private chat. And on that website, you can chat on it, so they should ban it. :p

and also get Minecraft Education Edition it's for school thingy whatever.

My Point is they Should ban it or whatever they are suggestion

mingo-gag wrote:

cake__5 wrote:

-snip-

-snip-
and also get Minecraft Education Edition it's for school thingy whatever.

I'm lucky I'm on a personal Chromebook, but not everyone is like me, schools block the Google Play option.

8to16 wrote:

but eaglercraft is a pirate

ok you win
but people use the pirated site
in schools

and Scratchers get angry when a site
they use “often” gets censored in filter

I’m not against your suggestion, the suggestion wouldn’t end well

Why ban it entirely? And could you not apply a similar line of reasoning to links in comments? - 9/10 of them are adverts on featured and trending projects, but banning them outright would be absurd.

I think the solution to this is just to report spam posts rather than prohibit discussion on it completely.

(Also, I'm fairly certain topics about the filter or banning external content aren't allowed)

Please use Contact Us to make suggestions about Scratch's filters.

Also, isn't that just a pirated version of Minecraft? If so, I believe that this is already banned under Section 3.7 and 3.1.5 of the Terms of Use.

Voxalice wrote:

(#18)
Please use Contact Us to make suggestions about Scratch's filters.

Also, isn't that just a pirated version of Minecraft? If so, I believe that this is already banned under Section 3.7 and 3.1.5 of the Terms of Use.

so now i will bring up the quote and underline the important parts

3.1 The Scratch Team supports freedom of expression. However, Scratch is intended for a wide audience, and some content is inappropriate for the Scratch community. You may not use the Scratch service in any way, that:
1.Promotes bigotry, discrimination, hatred, or violence against any individual or group;
2.Threatens, harasses, or intimidates any other person, whether that person is a Scratch user or not;
3. Contains foul language or personal attacks;
4. Contains sexually explicit or graphically violent material;
5. Provides instructions on how to commit illegal activities or obtain illegal products;
6. Except in connection with organizing Scratch day events, asks any other user for personally identifying information, contact information, or passwords; or
7. Exposes any others person's personally identifying information, contact information, or passwords without that person's permission.

3.3 You agree to comply with all applicable laws and regulations when you use Scratch. You may not use Scratch in any unlawful way, including to harass, stalk, or defame any other person.

3.4 You may not impersonate, imitate or pretend to be somebody else when using the Services.

3.5 You agree not to use Scratch in any way intended to disrupt the service, gain unauthorized access to the service, or interfere with any other user's ability to use the service. Prohibited activities include, but are not limited to:
1.Posting content deliberately designed to crash the Scratch website or editor;
2.Linking to pages containing viruses or malware;
3.Using administrator passwords or pretending to be an administrator;
4.Repeatedly posting the same material, or “spamming”;
5.Using alternate accounts or organizing voting groups to manipulate site statistics, such as purposely trying to get on the “What the Community is Loving/Remixing” rows of the front page.

3.6 Commercial use of Scratch, user-generated content, and support materials is permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. However, the Scratch Team reserves the right to block any commercial use of Scratch that, in the Scratch Team's sole discretion, is harmful to the community. Harmful commercial use includes spamming or repeated advertisement through projects, comments, or forum posts.

3.7 You agree not to post links to any content outside of the Scratch website, if to do so would violate any part of the Terms of Use.
veiw source

crazyfrogcat wrote:

-snip-
5. Provides instructions on how to commit illegal activities or obtain illegal products;
-snip-

the instructions are implied. its not telling you “go to this url to get minecraft”. also, its not illegal if they arent selling it.

common sense anyone got it?

edit: i got that claim off a search result on google