The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

abubriski

gem1001 wrote:
abubriski wrote:
gem1001 wrote:
AlejandrixKing245 wrote:
scratch 4.0 will only be a editor update, but the concept we all made would change the site totally, like the GUI, and it would still use javascript and we just only get a editor update, the gen of scratch is currently 3.1 by the purple
The listing said there will be a ‘re-imagined online community’. How would that constitute only an editor update?
I’m sorry for posting so much

Where is this listing? I’ve never heard of it.
Go to the ‘Jobs’ link in the footer. On that page, under ‘Open roles’, is at the time of writing, a link to a listing for ‘Senior Back-End Engineer’.
Alternatively go to en.scratch-wiki.info/wiki/Scratch_4.0 and click on the link in the refences.

Thanks.

I’m sorry for posting this

AlejandrixKing245

i swear i would like a gui redesign we are stuck with bluey 2019 gui

8to16

We should add a “Common Rejected Suggestions” to the top of the list to prevent people from having to search through all of those less commonly suggested ideas.

it is sorted by how common the suggestions are rather than when they were added to the list.

here's what it would be:

1. Adding users to work on projects (this was confirmed to be the most commonly suggested feature by ST according to han, who is a YAB member, everything below is just what I've been seeing)
——— SPECULATION ZONE BELOW ———
2. Cloud lists
3. Changing usernames
4. Disabling remixing
5. Revert purple to blue

Last edited by 8to16 (Nov. 4, 2024 16:18:02)

Catscratcher07

-CatMeowMeow- wrote:
9.6
(…)
the Scratch Team is less interested in polling results and more interested in constructive posts on the forums

I don't care! Every half-decent forum has a polling function to allow for collecting much data. More users would take part in a poll than would respond to a thread on forum and results of a poll are easier to analyse. Even if Scratch Team didn't use it, it still would be key forum functionality which Scratch's forum is currently deprived of. The lack of it just makes the forum worse for no actual reason.

The only data obtained from a poll is how many people want vs don't want something, which means nothing to anyone who wants to discuss actual merits, Scratch is not and should not be a direct democracy. When it was discovered that polling functionality was built into the forum's software on April Fool's Day 2022 (I think it was 2022), half the posts were just “haha poll go brrr” ruining forums AFD RIP forums AFD :( —such distracting features should not be implemented.

gem1001 wrote:
Should 2.10 be removed? Because this (a ST job listing for for Senior Back-End Engineer that is accessible from the Jobs link in the footer) says it will come in Scratch 4.0.

The job listing states “creative ai” not specifically AI image generation.

Scratch137

8to16 wrote:
(#9111)
We should add a “Common Rejected Suggestions” to the top of the list to prevent people from having to search through all of those less commonly suggested ideas.

it is sorted by how common the suggestions are rather than when they were added to the list.

That's what the Table of Contents is for, I believe. The original post is already quite long, and adding another section to it would make the whole thing harder to navigate.

If you need to quickly find a section in the post, you can use Ctrl+F to search for a specific word or phrase.

alpha_ape_13

Roleplay in the forums. Most likely rejected? https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/787560/

8to16

alpha_ape_13 wrote:
(#9114)
Roleplay in the forums. Most likely rejected? https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/787560/

I would consider that already in the list, as a roleplay forum is basically an off-topic forum

Gonna sleep now

Last edited by 8to16 (Nov. 4, 2024 23:53:48)

BigNate469

It seems that the ST moved the blog post about experimenting with AI in Scratch from scratch.org back to Medium (the link in TOLORS no longer works). It's still at https://medium.com/scratchteam-blog/inside-scratch-lab-ai-image-generation-179f11bd921a

Catscratcher07

8to16 wrote:
alpha_ape_13 wrote:
(#9114)
Roleplay in the forums. Most likely rejected? https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/787560/
I would consider that already in the list, as a roleplay forum is basically an off-topic forum

Gonna sleep now

I think that roleplays are classified as text-based games, which are already mentioned in 9.3

Olimon7661

about 7.7: another thing is it could end up like that one roblox game where you have to pay robux to JUMP. YES, TO JUMP. I AM NOT KIDDING.

PrincessIsza

gem1001 wrote:
Should 2.10 be removed? Because this (a ST job listing for for Senior Back-End Engineer that is accessible from the Jobs link in the footer) says it will come in Scratch 4.0.
Actually it only implied it

What is 2.10?

gem1001

PrincessIsza wrote:
gem1001 wrote:
Should 2.10 be removed? Because this (a ST job listing for for Senior Back-End Engineer that is accessible from the Jobs link in the footer) says it will come in Scratch 4.0.
Actually it only implied it
What is 2.10?

Entry 2.10 on this list. However, the job listing just said creative AI, so it could be creating anything, so 2.10 probably won't need removing.

PrincessIsza

gem1001 wrote:
PrincessIsza wrote:
gem1001 wrote:
Should 2.10 be removed? Because this (a ST job listing for for Senior Back-End Engineer that is accessible from the Jobs link in the footer) says it will come in Scratch 4.0.
Actually it only implied it
What is 2.10?
Entry 2.10 on this list. However, the job listing just said creative AI, so it could be creating anything, so 2.10 probably won't need removing.

However, it can be used for creating inappropriate information,

so I don't really recommend it. However, it is up to the Scratch Team and the Scratch foundation, but we can give ideas

gem1001

Now that 3.0 blocks have finally reached the forums, there can finally be a realistic ‘when stop sign clicked’ block!

when @stopSign clicked ::events hat

Last edited by gem1001 (Nov. 6, 2024 16:53:22)

AlejandrixKing245

gem1001 wrote:
PrincessIsza wrote:
gem1001 wrote:
Should 2.10 be removed? Because this (a ST job listing for for Senior Back-End Engineer that is accessible from the Jobs link in the footer) says it will come in Scratch 4.0.
Actually it only implied it
What is 2.10?
Entry 2.10 on this list. However, the job listing just said creative AI, so it could be creating anything, so 2.10 probably won't need removing.

if 4.0 added themes i would make my scratch more personal even it would have the ability to amke your own themes (ignoring TOLORS), even custoizable scratch logo would make your scratch more personal

Catscratcher07

PrincessIsza wrote:
gem1001 wrote:
PrincessIsza wrote:
gem1001 wrote:
Should 2.10 be removed? Because this (a ST job listing for for Senior Back-End Engineer that is accessible from the Jobs link in the footer) says it will come in Scratch 4.0.
Actually it only implied it
What is 2.10?
Entry 2.10 on this list. However, the job listing just said creative AI, so it could be creating anything, so 2.10 probably won't need removing.
However, it can be used for creating inappropriate information, so I don't really recommend it. However, it is up to the Scratch Team and the Scratch foundation, but we can give ideas

One's lips could be used to create “inappropriate information,” it's not something that we can avoid by simply not implement a feature. So long as the ST knows what they're doing, we should be ok.

gem1001 wrote:
Now that 3.0 blocks have finally reached the forums, there can finally be a realistic ‘when stop sign clicked’ block!
when @stopSign clicked ::events hat

I understand adding the new block designs, by why did they implement stop sign support?

8to16

Catscratcher07 wrote:
(#9124)
I understand adding the new block designs, by why did they implement stop sign support?

They just slapped in the 3.0 scratchblocks engine that was already made (and used on the wiki) which had @stopSign

8to16

gem1001 wrote:
(#9122)
Now that 3.0 blocks have finally reached the forums, there can finally be a realistic ‘when stop sign clicked’ block!
when @stopSign clicked ::events hat

same with cat blocks, no image needed

when green flag clicked::cat

Sliced-UP

Libbyty2 wrote:
beetle blocks just got obliterated so uhh that can't be a real alternative anymore

What the heck are Beetle Blocks?

Catscratcher07

Sliced-UP wrote:
Libbyty2 wrote:
beetle blocks just got obliterated so uhh that can't be a real alternative anymore

What the heck are Beetle Blocks?

A mod that had 3D support.

Discuss Scratch