Catscratcher07 wrote:

(#8956)

Scratch137 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

(#8939)

Catscratcher07 wrote:

Make a true equation with <(5-5) = (0)> format return tru just got rejected.

There have been suggestions before about typing in an equation/expression and having Scratch automatically solve/evaluate it, right? I don't think this is the only time this has been suggested. I am interested in adding this to the list, but I'd like to see when else this has been suggested.

I was able to find this one from 2018.

I post from Paddle2see at the top of page 5 of that topic revels that it isn't rejected in the context of a specific block for it, rather than having it work in any comparing operator.

endyourenite wrote:

Guys, Stop suggesting rejected suggestions to TOLORS if there is barely any topics about that rejected suggestion. I think we need 3 or 4+ rejected topics per month for OP to add it, also, it shouldn't be a joke or spam topic.

Xzillox wrote:

endyourenite wrote:

Guys, Stop suggesting rejected suggestions to TOLORS if there is barely any topics about that rejected suggestion. I think we need 3 or 4+ rejected topics per month for OP to add it, also, it shouldn't be a joke or spam topic.

no, its good to post any newly rejected suggestions here so za-chary can keep track of them better and it allows for discussions about whether or not something would be good to add

pikachureal12345 wrote:

wy does it do from 0 to 100

Za-Chary wrote:

I've been using the post/ID links whenever I add a new entry to the list. This is something I want to do, but I haven't had the chance to do it. Now that the forums load quickly, I may be able to do it faster. When I finish writing this post, I'll update some of them at least in Section 2, and see if I can continue this later.

[b]7.4 [url=https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/3513044]Allow Scratchers to moderate the website[/url][/b]
A community moderator program used to exist where Scratchers could moderate the website, but it was removed due to some very inappropriate things showing up in the report queue, among other reasons.  A volunteer program could also encourage trolls to use moderator tools to cause problems on the website.  As a result, the Scratch Team has decided to only allow adults to moderate the website, including the forums, and those adults would need to join the Scratch Team as a paid position in order to moderate the website.
If you are 18 or older, legally allowed to work in the United States, and are interested in moderating the website, check out the [url=https://scratch.org/careers]Jobs[/url] link to see if there are any openings for the "Community Moderator" position.

Catscratcher07 wrote:

greentreebee wrote:

breakfast_for_dinner wrote:

greentreebee wrote:

(#8943)
thats from 2018. is there a newer one?

it's still relevant today

but its old and not solved in any way. we might as well start over if we start to appeal to that topic

Age doesn't matter in the suggestions forum, and that topic isn't even old compared to some topics that are still actively being discussed! All starting over would do is force repetition of everything that had already been said.

8to16 wrote:

Allowing younger people (under 18s) to join ST was rejected

I'm almost certain there are a few other topics suggesting this but I'm gonna have to find them on ocular

This could be added as a “This extends to …” in 7.4

greentreebee wrote:

Question for Za-Chary: Could there be a official list of accepted suggestions??? Like sorted from A-Z to decrease topic dupes?

greentreebee wrote:

A studio for studios has been closed, but not rejected. It was a dupe and now they are going to the old one.

Newest one closed: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/782910/

Oldest one being used: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/28804/

Also, people are calling this accepted because @Paddle2See was really enthusiastic about it and commented on it without even closing it! (there has got to be something there if he comments and not closes it!!! )

starlightsparker wrote:

…not The Official List of Closed Suggestions.

greentreebee wrote:

(#8979)
Also, people are calling this accepted because @Paddle2See was really enthusiastic about it and commented on it without even closing it! (there has got to be something there if he comments and not closes it!!! )

greentreebee wrote:

Question for Za-Chary: Could there be a official list of accepted suggestions??? Like sorted from A-Z to decrease topic dupes?

9.4 An official list of accepted suggestions
As a counterpart to the list of rejected suggestions, some Scratchers have expressed interest in compiling a list of features of Scratch that were suggested by someone, and eventually implemented. But it is not easy to tell whether a suggestion was implemented because it was suggested by Scratchers in the forums, Scratchers elsewhere, a Scratch Team member, a teacher, or someone else. In other words, every feature currently in Scratch was suggested by somebody, so such a list would just be a list of all features of Scratch.

TheCreatorOfUnTV wrote:

greentreebee wrote:

Question for Za-Chary: Could there be a official list of accepted suggestions??? Like sorted from A-Z to decrease topic dupes?

I'm 100% sure that's rejected.

greentreebee wrote:

TheCreatorOfUnTV wrote:

greentreebee wrote:

Question for Za-Chary: Could there be a official list of accepted suggestions??? Like sorted from A-Z to decrease topic dupes?

I'm 100% sure that's rejected.

where's the link?

starlightsparker wrote:

(#8981)
This is not The Official List of Closed Suggestions. Please only link a topic if it is rejected.

Scratch137 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

(#8939)

Catscratcher07 wrote:

Make a true equation with <(5-5) = (0)> format return tru just got rejected.

There have been suggestions before about typing in an equation/expression and having Scratch automatically solve/evaluate it, right? I don't think this is the only time this has been suggested. I am interested in adding this to the list, but I'd like to see when else this has been suggested.

I was able to find this one from 2018.

8to16 wrote:

Roman numeral blocks got rejected.

endyourenite wrote:

Guys, Stop suggesting rejected suggestions to TOLORS if there is barely any topics about that rejected suggestion. I think we need 3 or 4+ rejected topics per month for OP to add it, also, it shouldn't be a joke or spam topic.

Coughfe wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

I've been using the post/ID links whenever I add a new entry to the list. This is something I want to do, but I haven't had the chance to do it. Now that the forums load quickly, I may be able to do it faster. When I finish writing this post, I'll update some of them at least in Section 2, and see if I can continue this later.

I forgot to remind, whoop.
Doesn't seem like anyone else has, so uh…
Reminder

Coughfe wrote:

Also, 7.4 uses the /jobs link, rather than scratch.org; could that be updated?

8to16 wrote:

Allowing younger people (under 18s) to join ST was rejected

I'm almost certain there are a few other topics suggesting this but I'm gonna have to find them on ocular

This could be added as a “This extends to …” in 7.4

greentreebee wrote:

A studio for studios has been closed, but not rejected. It was a dupe and now they are going to the old one.

greentreebee wrote:

Question for Za-Chary: Could there be a official list of accepted suggestions??? Like sorted from A-Z to decrease topic dupes?

AliMASTER430258 wrote:

greentreebee wrote:

where's the link?

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/371581/?page=1#post-3718725 (deadlinked)

Za-Chary wrote:

endyourenite wrote:

Guys, Stop suggesting rejected suggestions to TOLORS if there is barely any topics about that rejected suggestion. I think we need 3 or 4+ rejected topics per month for OP to add it, also, it shouldn't be a joke or spam topic.

I encourage everybody to share newly-rejected suggestions in this thread. Even if the suggestion is “obviously rejected” or “infrequently suggested,” it's good for me to be aware that it was suggested and rejected so I can keep this in mind for the future, in case the suggestion ever does become “frequently suggested.”

Rosho_Robotics wrote:

(#8989)
here's a block, this will be really useful for a lot of people, I wouldn't be surprised if somebody had this idea, I will also show its use, also another block that's cool, ill show that one.:

< [mouse-pointer v] touching [sprite1 v] ?>

say [this would be rly useful! plz add it.]

when green flag clicked
forever
if << [mouse-pointer v] touching [Settings icon v] ?>> then
if <(Settings Open) = [True]> then 
set [Settings Open v] to [False]
wait (0.05) secs


else
set [Settings Open v] to [True]
wait (0.05) secs
end
end
end

transition backdrop from [backdrop1 v] to [backdrop2 v]

transition costume from [costume1 v] to [costume2 v]