FirstEye wrote:

(#29)
W rizz support

MonkeyBean2 wrote:

If this was added it would be nice if you could put a list in there as well to eg. sum up all items in a list

medians wrote:

TheCreatorOfUnTV wrote:

medians wrote:

TheCreatorOfUnTV wrote:

medians wrote:

Oh, and, why does the equals block have a dropdown in the original post?

Don't worry, this is not a feature currently in 3.0 but it would go with the dropdown system.

I mean, I don't really usually get the dropdown, since block switching could just be reimplemented outside of the Data category (basically, before 3.0, you could also swap certain operator blocks to other related blocks, and that included the equals block by right clicking, which you can still do currently, but only for variables and lists).

Block switching is not possible on tablets and slightly harder on Chrome Books than on most computers (which is the whole reason Scratch switched to HTML5, NOT because they knew Flash was going to get removed), and the dropdown system would reduce clutter on the blocks page as well as being less confusing for beginners who don't know right-clicking gave you a list of blocks.

You're able to right click on mobile by holding down, which you can already do for the Data category with variable/list names. It could be explained somewhere, and I'm often concerned about putting the dropdown because of the fact that it can make scripts a lot longer.
Also, you know what I mean by Data category xD

ajskateboarder wrote:

TheCreatorOfUnTV wrote:

This idea, allowing changing of how many inputs there are in an operator block, would help users make cleaner code.
Ones that would be affected:

<do logical operation [and v] to <> <> @delInput @addInput :: operators> // Redesign of the boolean blocks.

I feel like the and block could be better worded as:

<<> and <> @delInput @addInput :: operators>
<<> and <> and <> @delInput @addInput :: operators>

-snip-

@delInput

<<> @delInput @addInput :: operators> // clicking the < again deletes the block

<<> [and v] <> [or v] <>@delInput @addInput::operators>

ihavenocluewhythisis wrote:

what if you press the

@delInput

when its only one and? you get

<<> @delInput @addInput :: operators> // clicking the < again deletes the block

ihavenocluewhythisis wrote:

oh btw dropdowns could be added, they would be seperate so you can make

<<> [and v] <> [or v] <>@delInput @addInput::operators>

TheCreatorOfUnTV wrote:

ihavenocluewhythisis wrote:

oh btw dropdowns could be added, they would be seperate so you can make

<<> [and v] <> [or v] <>@delInput @addInput::operators>

I like the dropdown idea (and already talked about it), but there shouldn't be multiple dropdowns because it would get confusing.

ihavenocluewhythisis wrote:

TheCreatorOfUnTV wrote:

ihavenocluewhythisis wrote:

oh btw dropdowns could be added, they would be seperate so you can make

<<> [and v] <> [or v] <>@delInput @addInput::operators>

I like the dropdown idea (and already talked about it), but there shouldn't be multiple dropdowns because it would get confusing.

how else to make an and or

<[and v] <> <-[or v] <> <> @addInput :: operators>  @addInput :: operators>