Fluffygamer_ wrote:

Bump
The 21.0 BBcode is almost done!

Edit : King !

seg-leinad wrote:

(#64)
Emmm… Is Digital-_ active?

They don't seem to, and the list hasn't been edited removing ItsIzyan yet…

Fluffygamer_ wrote:

(#65)

seg-leinad wrote:

(#64)
Emmm… Is Digital-_ active?

They don't seem to, and the list hasn't been edited removing ItsIzyan yet…

You're right, they are not active

78ch3 wrote:

(#66)

Fluffygamer_ wrote:

(#65)

seg-leinad wrote:

(#64)
Emmm… Is Digital-_ active?

They don't seem to, and the list hasn't been edited removing ItsIzyan yet…

You're right, they are not active

Ironic

78ch3 wrote:

Wouldn't it be funny if you went inactive, someone else had to run it, then people would argue over who to run it next, soon we'd have topics for “Present and Future Owners of Present and Future Owners of The Shopping Mall”, then whoever was running that goes inactive, and we get more and more of these topics before ultimately we have an entire subforum dedicated to deciding the owner of each Present and Future owners iteration.

Rubixcube908 wrote:

78ch3 wrote:

Wouldn't it be funny if you went inactive, someone else had to run it, then people would argue over who to run it next, soon we'd have topics for “Present and Future Owners of Present and Future Owners of The Shopping Mall”, then whoever was running that goes inactive, and we get more and more of these topics before ultimately we have an entire subforum dedicated to deciding the owner of each Present and Future owners iteration.

the time is coming

depresso-boiyo wrote:

(#69)

Rubixcube908 wrote:

78ch3 wrote:

Wouldn't it be funny if you went inactive, someone else had to run it, then people would argue over who to run it next, soon we'd have topics for “Present and Future Owners of Present and Future Owners of The Shopping Mall”, then whoever was running that goes inactive, and we get more and more of these topics before ultimately we have an entire subforum dedicated to deciding the owner of each Present and Future owners iteration.

the time is coming

I do think this topic should be stickied TwT

Rubixcube908 wrote:

(#68)

78ch3 wrote:

Wouldn't it be funny if you went inactive, someone else had to run it, then people would argue over who to run it next, soon we'd have topics for “Present and Future Owners of Present and Future Owners of The Shopping Mall”, then whoever was running that goes inactive, and we get more and more of these topics before ultimately we have an entire subforum dedicated to deciding the owner of each Present and Future owners iteration.

the time is coming

Fluffygamer_ wrote:

depresso-boiyo wrote:

(#69)

Rubixcube908 wrote:

78ch3 wrote:

Wouldn't it be funny if you went inactive, someone else had to run it, then people would argue over who to run it next, soon we'd have topics for “Present and Future Owners of Present and Future Owners of The Shopping Mall”, then whoever was running that goes inactive, and we get more and more of these topics before ultimately we have an entire subforum dedicated to deciding the owner of each Present and Future owners iteration.

the time is coming

I do think this topic should be stickied TwT

but the topic owner went inactive…

depresso-boiyo wrote:

(#71)

Fluffygamer_ wrote:

depresso-boiyo wrote:

(#69)

Rubixcube908 wrote:

78ch3 wrote:

Wouldn't it be funny if you went inactive, someone else had to run it, then people would argue over who to run it next, soon we'd have topics for “Present and Future Owners of Present and Future Owners of The Shopping Mall”, then whoever was running that goes inactive, and we get more and more of these topics before ultimately we have an entire subforum dedicated to deciding the owner of each Present and Future owners iteration.

the time is coming

I do think this topic should be stickied TwT

but the topic owner went inactive…

Scratch admins can make a different topic and sticky it, they wont be inactive for awhile so they can just update it

Fluffygamer_ wrote:

depresso-boiyo wrote:

(#71)

Fluffygamer_ wrote:

depresso-boiyo wrote:

(#69)

Rubixcube908 wrote:

78ch3 wrote:

Wouldn't it be funny if you went inactive, someone else had to run it, then people would argue over who to run it next, soon we'd have topics for “Present and Future Owners of Present and Future Owners of The Shopping Mall”, then whoever was running that goes inactive, and we get more and more of these topics before ultimately we have an entire subforum dedicated to deciding the owner of each Present and Future owners iteration.

the time is coming

I do think this topic should be stickied TwT

but the topic owner went inactive…

Scratch admins can make a different topic and sticky it, they wont be inactive for awhile so they can just update it

Are you sure about that part ? They are inactive since a very long time.

seg-leinad wrote:

(#73)

Fluffygamer_ wrote:

depresso-boiyo wrote:

(#71)

Fluffygamer_ wrote:

depresso-boiyo wrote:

(#69)

Rubixcube908 wrote:

78ch3 wrote:

Wouldn't it be funny if you went inactive, someone else had to run it, then people would argue over who to run it next, soon we'd have topics for “Present and Future Owners of Present and Future Owners of The Shopping Mall”, then whoever was running that goes inactive, and we get more and more of these topics before ultimately we have an entire subforum dedicated to deciding the owner of each Present and Future owners iteration.

the time is coming

I do think this topic should be stickied TwT

but the topic owner went inactive…

Scratch admins can make a different topic and sticky it, they wont be inactive for awhile so they can just update it

Are you sure about that part ? They are inactive since a very long time.

ST members will not be inactive for a while. Anyway, forum moderators can edit anyone's posts, so I suppose we could just report the original post on this topic and get it updated.

78ch3 wrote:

Wouldn't it be funny if you went inactive, someone else had to run it, then people would argue over who to run it next, soon we'd have topics for “Present and Future Owners of Present and Future Owners of The Shopping Mall”, then whoever was running that goes inactive, and we get more and more of these topics before ultimately we have an entire subforum dedicated to deciding the owner of each Present and Future owners iteration.

Rubixcube908 wrote:

(#68)

78ch3 wrote:

Wouldn't it be funny if you went inactive, someone else had to run it, then people would argue over who to run it next, soon we'd have topics for “Present and Future Owners of Present and Future Owners of The Shopping Mall”, then whoever was running that goes inactive, and we get more and more of these topics before ultimately we have an entire subforum dedicated to deciding the owner of each Present and Future owners iteration.

the time is coming

depresso-boiyo wrote:

(#76)

78ch3 wrote:

Wouldn't it be funny if you went inactive, someone else had to run it, then people would argue over who to run it next, soon we'd have topics for “Present and Future Owners of Present and Future Owners of The Shopping Mall”, then whoever was running that goes inactive, and we get more and more of these topics before ultimately we have an entire subforum dedicated to deciding the owner of each Present and Future owners iteration.

this quote is actually reality smh

78ch3 wrote:

(#77)

Rubixcube908 wrote:

(#68)

78ch3 wrote:

Wouldn't it be funny if you went inactive, someone else had to run it, then people would argue over who to run it next, soon we'd have topics for “Present and Future Owners of Present and Future Owners of The Shopping Mall”, then whoever was running that goes inactive, and we get more and more of these topics before ultimately we have an entire subforum dedicated to deciding the owner of each Present and Future owners iteration.

the time is coming

depresso-boiyo wrote:

(#76)

78ch3 wrote:

Wouldn't it be funny if you went inactive, someone else had to run it, then people would argue over who to run it next, soon we'd have topics for “Present and Future Owners of Present and Future Owners of The Shopping Mall”, then whoever was running that goes inactive, and we get more and more of these topics before ultimately we have an entire subforum dedicated to deciding the owner of each Present and Future owners iteration.

this quote is actually reality smh

Perhaps we should get started on that topic, then. Any takers?

78ch3 wrote:

Perhaps we should get started on that topic, then. Any takers?

depresso-boiyo wrote:

78ch3 wrote:

Perhaps we should get started on that topic, then. Any takers?

I mean I can do it, I may have occassional tabs of inactivity but I mean I'll still always come back at least once or twice a week

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/779217/?page=1#post-8126989