ilikescratch7169 wrote:

ImmortalJelly13 wrote:

geodashkid wrote:

MythosLore wrote:

geodashkid wrote:

I think people should stop reporting ads. The cg (community guidelines) never said anything about it. People only advertise because they spend days on a project and get 0 views. They arent fame hungry, not spammers, not cm breakers. THEY ARE DISCOURAGED!!! My friend is getting mass reported JUST because he advertises, and he wakes up to so much hate. SO ST STOP BANNING ADVERTISERS!!!!!!

The Scratch Team can create policies that aren’t in the Community Guidelines, such as the browser extension one.

Btw advertising is sharing, it’s just some 5 year old changed the name and it stuck.

advertising is a form of spam usually

Can you stop necroposting?

TheEpikGamer211 wrote:

ilikescratch7169 wrote:

ImmortalJelly13 wrote:

geodashkid wrote:

MythosLore wrote:

geodashkid wrote:

I think people should stop reporting ads. The cg (community guidelines) never said anything about it. People only advertise because they spend days on a project and get 0 views. They arent fame hungry, not spammers, not cm breakers. THEY ARE DISCOURAGED!!! My friend is getting mass reported JUST because he advertises, and he wakes up to so much hate. SO ST STOP BANNING ADVERTISERS!!!!!!

The Scratch Team can create policies that aren’t in the Community Guidelines, such as the browser extension one.

Btw advertising is sharing, it’s just some 5 year old changed the name and it stuck.

advertising is a form of spam usually

Can you stop necroposting?

what post ls it?
btw you cant necro in the suggestions forum.

ilikescratch7169 wrote:

TheEpikGamer211 wrote:

ilikescratch7169 wrote:

ImmortalJelly13 wrote:

geodashkid wrote:

MythosLore wrote:

geodashkid wrote:

I think people should stop reporting ads. The cg (community guidelines) never said anything about it. People only advertise because they spend days on a project and get 0 views. They arent fame hungry, not spammers, not cm breakers. THEY ARE DISCOURAGED!!! My friend is getting mass reported JUST because he advertises, and he wakes up to so much hate. SO ST STOP BANNING ADVERTISERS!!!!!!

The Scratch Team can create policies that aren’t in the Community Guidelines, such as the browser extension one.

Btw advertising is sharing, it’s just some 5 year old changed the name and it stuck.

advertising is a form of spam usually

Can you stop necroposting?

what post ls it?
btw you cant necro in the suggestions forum.

I am not necro and they were talking about ads in the wrong topic.

Ahaahaa_ALT wrote:

(#545)
No support. A ban can block users.

cosmic-nebula wrote:

(#550)
I support this, but wouldn't you just be able to continue working on the project? If you have another unbanned account, you can just download the project and keep working on it? It just defeats the whole purpose of the ban.

AlstontjhinauttpYT wrote:

(#551)
working on projects

mumu245 wrote:

AlstontjhinauttpYT wrote:

(#551)
working on projects

Why should working on unshared projects be banned?

myeducate wrote:

I'm not sure on the “phases” thing. It was just an idea.
People seem to like it

Read before you say “No Support”

Charles12310 wrote:

LionHeart70 wrote:

It's a good idea, but it kinda makes the point of the ban useless.
The ban is to make sure you can't do anything on Scratch, so it punishes you from not being able to interact with your projects so you understand that you shouldn't do the action again. For instance, say you get grounded and then your parents decide to still let you play with your favorite toy. Doesn't really teach you the punishment.. and might lead to you thinking the action is okay to do.
Sorry.. no support for this reason.

It seems like you have misunderstood. The user did not suggest to still be able to interact with stuff on Scratch when you are banned. The user said that you are allowed to look at stuff but you are unable to interact with it. For example, you can look at a project that just recently received so much comments. You want to reply to them, but you can't because you are banned. That is what the user is trying to say. So in the real case of the example you demonstrated, the child can look at the toy, but he can't play with it because of the restriction.

Kronix_ wrote:

No support. If you fail to follow the community guidelines, you shouldn't be allowed to use the site at all. Usually bans only apply when you severely break the guidelines, if you actually get banned, that means you aren't capable of using the site properly. The only thing you can really do here is install the Scratch editor (of the version you so choose) and/or log out which means you can explore the site, play games, etc., but cannot do a majority of things you could do if you even had an account. You can save projects and save your backpack in the editor (with only your blocks that you have access to in your editor) iirc, but that's pretty much all you can do.

Olimon7661 wrote:

Support. Technically bans are meant to remove your Scratch privileges but, let's look at the purpose of Scratch. Education. For example, if you got featured and an impersonator started misbehaving as you, the ST might take a bit to realize, that wasn't you on another network, that was a troll account. So why not be able to at least use the project creating aspect of Scratch for its purpose, education.