Meeperz788 wrote:

yadayadayadagoodbye wrote:

snip-

hmm… so what about fnf, many of their mod characters are just .exe added to a normal person, and I've seen them on scratch, so shouldn't that be banned

Currently, no, there has been little amount of innapropriate projects regarding fnf that has been created.

I believe you might be missing the point here, wether a franchise is banned or not does not depend on the appropriateness of itself (atleast mostly, there might be a few exceptions), it depends on the amount of innapropriate projects which people creates. A slightly creepy project isn't inherently innapropriate, and many FNaF projects are techinically abiding to the rules, however, as there had been a high amount of innapropriate FNaF projects, the franchise got banned.

Its like airport security, sure, its possible to check every bottle of liquid to make sure its not flammable or explosive, but that would be extremely time consuming, so they instead simply ban you from bringing liquids through the securities. Its similar in this case, while the ST COULD check each and every FNaF project to see if they abide to the rules or not, the high amount of them not abiding to the rules means that it would simply take too long, thus, it was decided to simply ban all FNaF projects.

You could always share these projects on other platforms, you're not forced to use scratch, and you're not even stuck to scratch due to language, you can upload Scratch (language) projects on other platforms as well.

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

Meeperz788 wrote:

So all FNaF games give warnings, it's not my fault kids don't listen

Not all. Plus kids could just skip the warnings.

ik not all but technically, it's like not reading the terms to signing something, if you don't read it, consequences can occur

Meeperz788 wrote:

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

Meeperz788 wrote:

So all FNaF games give warnings, it's not my fault kids don't listen

Not all. Plus kids could just skip the warnings.

ik not all but technically, it's like not reading the terms to signing something, if you don't read it, consequences can occur

Have you read the CG's and TOS? That's my point. It's like skipping a warning.

yadayadayadagoodbye wrote:

Meeperz788 wrote:

yadayadayadagoodbye wrote:

snip-

hmm… so what about fnf, many of their mod characters are just .exe added to a normal person, and I've seen them on scratch, so shouldn't that be banned

Currently, no, there has been little amount of innapropriate projects regarding fnf that has been created.

I believe you might be missing the point here, wether a franchise is banned or not does not depend on the appropriateness of itself (atleast mostly, there might be a few exceptions), it depends on the amount of innapropriate projects which people creates. A slightly creepy project isn't inherently innapropriate, and many FNaF projects are techinically abiding to the rules, however, as there had been a high amount of innapropriate FNaF projects, the franchise got banned.

Its like airport security, sure, its possible to check every bottle of liquid to make sure its not flammable or explosive, but that would be extremely time consuming, so they instead simply ban you from bringing liquids through the securities. Its similar in this case, while the ST COULD check each and every FNaF project to see if they abide to the rules or not, the high amount of them not abiding to the rules means that it would simply take too long, thus, it was decided to simply ban all FNaF projects.

You could always share these projects on other platforms, you're not forced to use scratch, and you're not even stuck to scratch due to language, you can upload Scratch (language) projects on other platforms as well.

well than what's the point, ik a guy who doesn't post FNAF, but still gets mass reported every week, st needs to update their bot

Meeperz788 wrote:

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

Meeperz788 wrote:

So all FNaF games give warnings, it's not my fault kids don't listen

Not all. Plus kids could just skip the warnings.

ik not all but technically, it's like not reading the terms to signing something, if you don't read it, consequences can occur

A lot of kids simply won't do that, not understanding the consequences of doing so. Anyways, Scratch will still remove FNaF projects with warnings:

Can I put a disclaimer on my Scratch project to warn people it's not for all ages?
Everything shared in our community should be appropriate for all ages. Any content that requires a disclaimer or warning isn't aligned with this philosophy and would not be suitable for Scratch. If a warning is needed, it is probably not appropriate for Scratch.

- https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/168506/

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

Meeperz788 wrote:

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

Meeperz788 wrote:

So all FNaF games give warnings, it's not my fault kids don't listen

Not all. Plus kids could just skip the warnings.

ik not all but technically, it's like not reading the terms to signing something, if you don't read it, consequences can occur

Have you read the CG's and TOS? That's my point. It's like skipping a warning.

So it's their fault

Meeperz788 wrote:

So it's their fault

You didn't answer my question; Did you read the CG's and TOS?

ajskateboarder wrote:

Meeperz788 wrote:

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

Meeperz788 wrote:

So all FNaF games give warnings, it's not my fault kids don't listen

Not all. Plus kids could just skip the warnings.

ik not all but technically, it's like not reading the terms to signing something, if you don't read it, consequences can occur

A lot of kids simply won't do that, not understanding the consequences of doing so. Anyways, Scratch will still remove FNaF projects with warnings:

Can I put a disclaimer on my Scratch project to warn people it's not for all ages?
Everything shared in our community should be appropriate for all ages. Any content that requires a disclaimer or warning isn't aligned with this philosophy and would not be suitable for Scratch. If a warning is needed, it is probably not appropriate for Scratch.

- https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/168506/

that's also my point for filtering nfe, why cant you make something nfe yourself, and why isn't there an option to filter it out, st is just being lazy, they get millions of donations every year and we still don't have a dark theme

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

Meeperz788 wrote:

So it's their fault

You didn't answer my question; Did you read the CG's and TOS?

yes I do most of the time when its with something I've never seen before, if I've seen someone else do it then I think its fine not to

Meeperz788 wrote:

(#49)
that's also my point for filtering nfe, why cant you make something nfe yourself, and why isn't there an option to filter it out, st is just being lazy, they get millions of donations every year and we still don't have a dark theme

https://scratch.mit.edu/statistics/

155 837 017 projects shared,
129 347 278 users registered,
949 451 577 comments posted,
34 398 038 studios created

EDIT: You see the issue yet?

Contraery wrote:

Meeperz788 wrote:

(#49)
that's also my point for filtering nfe, why cant you make something nfe yourself, and why isn't there an option to filter it out, st is just being lazy, they get millions of donations every year and we still don't have a dark theme

https://scratch.mit.edu/statistics/

155 837 017 projects shared,
129 347 278 users registered,
949 451 577 comments posted,
34 398 038 studios created

EDIT: You see the issue yet?

no, i do not

But st can't deny it, there will always be FNAF projects, it is too popular

SANDVICHISGOOD wrote:

yadayadayadagoodbye wrote:

SANDVICHISGOOD wrote:

Dude fr I've seen scarier things on Scratch and its not NFE and it has whole ahh jump scares louder than a jet but a goofy little game with static noises and animal robots popping up on ur screen that aren't even that bad is banned?

Also, how is Joy of Creation not banned either? Its FNAF but a hundred times scarier.

Because there is rarely innapropriate content created relating to these

I can probably name a few things wildly innapropriate that isn't NFEd, not because they shouldn't be, but because theres been no projects made relating them at all

bro JoC is literally one of the scariest FNAF games what are u on about???

That’s what I’m saying!

Guys it's not just the FNaF name we need to restore, we need to save hard working scratch FNaF creators who keep getting banned for just making a good FNaF fan game. We need to save the scratch FNaF community!

OddballGames wrote:

Guys it's not just the FNaF name we need to restore, we need to save hard working scratch FNaF creators who keep getting banned for just making a good FNaF fan game. We need to save the scratch FNaF community!

yes

OddballGames wrote:

Guys it's not just the FNaF name we need to restore, we need to save hard working scratch FNaF creators who keep getting banned for just making a good FNaF fan game. We need to save the scratch FNaF community!

Let the revolution begin!

wats this

capybara350 wrote:

wats this

remember how FNaF is banned, we're trying to get it back

capybara350 wrote:

wats this

something that aint very wholesome kiddo

Meeperz788 wrote:

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

Meeperz788 wrote:

So all FNaF games give warnings, it's not my fault kids don't listen

Not all. Plus kids could just skip the warnings.

ik not all but technically, it's like not reading the terms to signing something, if you don't read it, consequences can occur

Which is why children cannot legally sign documents themselves.

Children is generally not seen as a group of people who can be expected to take care of themselves, one of such reasons being that they make some pretty bad decisions. Unlike most other situations, it is your fault if kids don't listen, because kids aren't supposed expected to listen. This would be different on a site for, well, not children, but as scratch is aimed at kids in the first place, its only safe to make sure that the kids who don't listen to warnings don't do something they'd strongly regret.

tl: dr its not expected for a kid to listen to a warning