doggy_boi1 wrote:

yeah but what does this actually fix? isn't this just adding extra steps to finding the word you want to take out?

doggy_boi1 wrote:

(#60)

Sliverus wrote:

kkidslogin wrote:

How about this: when you get the notification, just include a random amount of words (7-15 should work) to either side. Then you don't have to detect sentences, and it's not immediately obvious which word it is because it won't be in the center.

I think both of our solutions could probably work fairly well. I'll listen to what others have to say.

yeah but what does this actually fix? isn't this just adding extra steps to finding the word you want to take out?

Sliverus wrote:

(#61)

doggy_boi1 wrote:

yeah but what does this actually fix? isn't this just adding extra steps to finding the word you want to take out?

Actually, it's taking steps out of the process. It's a way that doesn't explicitly state the word, but it simplifies the process of fixing questionable phrases to make an appropriate post.

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

This + a message saying “if this seems to be a mistake please (contact us) to report it or for more information”
Would even be great as it would reduce the BAG topics about filter issues exposing even more people to bad words

Sliverus wrote:

(#63)
I'd like to hear more feedback on the new idea of mine. If several people agree it is a fair idea, I think I might change the original suggestion to the new idea.

Red-Koala1 wrote:

Hii!

I am having trouble proposing my studio because it says “Sorry, this post appears to include unsuitable language and will not be posted.”

I checked every word and it seems fine! I don't know why this happening though-

Me from my own topic that I just closed wrote:

I vote that the feature of actually specifying what words need to be censored or taken out is added to ease the lives and brains of us, the people. And I know it's pretty easy to implement too: literally since you have a detection for these specific words, just barf it back out in the output.

starlightsparker wrote:

So it would work like this?:
Pretend that “cat” is a bad word.

User wrote:
Cats are cool, and I exist so yes eeeeeeeeeeee

Filter wrote:
You have been muted for
Comment that lead to this:
“Cats are cool”

BlauHourglass wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

So it would work like this?:
Pretend that “cat” is a bad word.

User wrote:
Cats are cool, and I exist so yes eeeeeeeeeeee

Filter wrote:
You have been muted for
Comment that lead to this:
“Cats are cool”

I think it'd be better if it were more specific. just:
Filter wrote:
You have been muted for
Word(s) that lead to this:
“Cat”.

BlauHourglass wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

So it would work like this?:
Pretend that “cat” is a bad word.

User wrote:
Cats are cool, and I exist so yes eeeeeeeeeeee

Filter wrote:
You have been muted for
Comment that lead to this:
“Cats are cool”

I think it'd be better if it were more specific. just:
Filter wrote:
You have been muted for
Word(s) that lead to this:
“Cat”.

starlightsparker wrote:

(#72)

BlauHourglass wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

So it would work like this?:
Pretend that “cat” is a bad word.

User wrote:
Cats are cool, and I exist so yes eeeeeeeeeeee

Filter wrote:
You have been muted for
Comment that lead to this:
“Cats are cool”

I think it'd be better if it were more specific. just:
Filter wrote:
You have been muted for
Word(s) that lead to this:
“Cat”.

Yeah I agree actually.

plantskym2 wrote:

(#73)

BlauHourglass wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

So it would work like this?:
Pretend that “cat” is a bad word.

User wrote:
Cats are cool, and I exist so yes eeeeeeeeeeee

Filter wrote:
You have been muted for
Comment that lead to this:
“Cats are cool”

I think it'd be better if it were more specific. just:
Filter wrote:
You have been muted for
Word(s) that lead to this:
“Cat”.

Yeah, I agree too, because then you could know exactly what you said wrong, and not just a phrase.

kkidslogin wrote:

(#62)

doggy_boi1 wrote:

(#60)

Sliverus wrote:

kkidslogin wrote:

How about this: when you get the notification, just include a random amount of words (7-15 should work) to either side. Then you don't have to detect sentences, and it's not immediately obvious which word it is because it won't be in the center.

I think both of our solutions could probably work fairly well. I'll listen to what others have to say.

yeah but what does this actually fix? isn't this just adding extra steps to finding the word you want to take out?

It makes it easier for people making revisions without explicitly showing a bad word, if one is there. It narrows down the area which it's in.

EDIT: As @Sliverus said:

Sliverus wrote:

(#61)

doggy_boi1 wrote:

yeah but what does this actually fix? isn't this just adding extra steps to finding the word you want to take out?

Actually, it's taking steps out of the process. It's a way that doesn't explicitly state the word, but it simplifies the process of fixing questionable phrases to make an appropriate post.