Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
- weeeeeeeyay5
- Scratcher
21 posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
There are a lot of old 2.0 blocks that are useful or just save time. Below you can put any removed ones that you think should be brought back.
Hello! This is a wall to protect my signature to toxic comments and people. If you see said toxic people, click the (Report!) button. ("note: it may not be that color").
when green flag clicked
forever
Imagine
Program
Share
“Logic will get you from A to Z. Imagination will get you everywhere.” -Albert Einstein
“You can't do anything if you don't try.” -weeeeeeeyay5
- weeeeeeeyay5
- Scratcher
21 posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
First, I'd recommend the
all at onceblock. It saves you time by making it so you don't have to make a custom block just to run something without screen refresh.
end
Hello! This is a wall to protect my signature to toxic comments and people. If you see said toxic people, click the (Report!) button. ("note: it may not be that color").
when green flag clicked
forever
Imagine
Program
Share
“Logic will get you from A to Z. Imagination will get you everywhere.” -Albert Einstein
“You can't do anything if you don't try.” -weeeeeeeyay5
- weeeeeeeyay5
- Scratcher
21 posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
that did not come out right, i meant
oh and it continues
foreverbut with the text “all at once”.
end
oh and it continues
Last edited by weeeeeeeyay5 (March 29, 2024 18:26:14)
Hello! This is a wall to protect my signature to toxic comments and people. If you see said toxic people, click the (Report!) button. ("note: it may not be that color").
when green flag clicked
forever
Imagine
Program
Share
“Logic will get you from A to Z. Imagination will get you everywhere.” -Albert Einstein
“You can't do anything if you don't try.” -weeeeeeeyay5
- weeeeeeeyay5
- Scratcher
21 posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
Another is the “costume number” and “backdrop number” reporter blocks. These could be used to debug and for other reasons.
Hello! This is a wall to protect my signature to toxic comments and people. If you see said toxic people, click the (Report!) button. ("note: it may not be that color").
when green flag clicked
forever
Imagine
Program
Share
“Logic will get you from A to Z. Imagination will get you everywhere.” -Albert Einstein
“You can't do anything if you don't try.” -weeeeeeeyay5
- RecessFailsOffical
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
Another is the “costume number” and “backdrop number” reporter blocks. These could be used to debug and for other reasons.
Those exist
(costume #)
(backdrop #)
and no lists please
highlight (double click) a piece of text + control (command if on mac) + shift + down arrow key to see my full “siggy”.
If your computer can't see images from Cubeupload, that's not my problem
I ACTUALLY REACHED 1000+ POSTS
“Some people can read War and Peace and come away thinking it's a simple adventure story. Others can read the ingredients on a chewing gum wrapper and unlock the secrets of the universe.”
I ACTUALLY REACHED 1000+ POSTS
“Some people can read War and Peace and come away thinking it's a simple adventure story. Others can read the ingredients on a chewing gum wrapper and unlock the secrets of the universe.”
cool stuff: 500th post | an awesome suggestion made by moi | an awesome controversial suggestion also made by moi | gen z has attacked | why did tfh get deleted yall
American-Armenian
Hi! I'm @RecessFailsOffical. This is my signature, where I am allowed to advertise, blockspam, etc. It goes under every post I make. I know I spelled Official wrong in my username because I made this account when I was like 2. I'm in 6th Grade, I like coding and I want to be a software developer when I grow up.
Pronouns: He/Him or any pronouns as long as I'm not referred to as “Gibson”, “she/her”, or “TommyInnit”.
- Roblox888i
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
~snip~This is not a list, a list of suggestions is unrelated to each other, so if I say I wanted to add a looks block and a control block, that's a list, but showing multiple control blocks to suggest is NOT a list
and no lists please
#5
~snip~Please add all of the things you suggested to the OP.
Below this little line ^ is my signature, you can edit it by going to scratch.mit.edu/discuss/settings/YOURUSERHERE/ also highlight a part and do CNTRL+SHIFT+DOWN to scroll down.
Roblox888i
===========================================================================================================
| Ocular Profile | Scratch Profile | ScratchStats Profile | Github Profile |
===========================================================================================================
===========================================================================================================
| Ocular Profile | Scratch Profile | ScratchStats Profile | Github Profile |
=================================
| | Scratch Wiki Profile | |===========================================================================================================
REST OF SIGNATURE NOT DONE
- medians
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
Those both became the costume () (which can has number and name in a dropdown) as well as backdrop () (same thing) blocks, so this will not happen. Another is the “costume number” and “backdrop number” reporter blocks. These could be used to debug and for other reasons.
Duplicate: First, I'd recommend theall at onceblock. It saves you time by making it so you don't have to make a custom block just to run something without screen refresh.
end
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/5690/
:D: 2.0 is 11 years old https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/1018259409/
Medians bamboozled by 3.0 (version 3.0): https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/979822351/
hi875230163394: You're similar to valve in that you both hate a certain number…
Scratch 0.x, 1.x, 2.x, 3.x and LogoBlocks Archives
Bamboozlement: https://scratch.mit.edu/studios/33739789
Years on internet: 15 (soon 16)
medians: Oh god not this utc - 12 thing again..
Fun_Cupcake_i81: What, were you expecting not to see the utc - 12 thing again? THE UTC - 12 THIGN ALWAYS RETURNS. ALWAYS.
medians: I knew it would happen. I was the one who started it last year.
Fun_Cupcake_i81: Well then if you didn't want it back maybe you need to time travel to last year and fix that
Oh wait if you could time travel I think we all know exactly when you would go-
user1: That picture is from 2.0. Now he’s at my house and is my pet.
user2: But this is medians we're talking about, so “from 2.0” can mean the same thing as “from five seconds ago”.
Detect Scratch version here
My other accounts: @selfexplanatory @modesties @chaircard @fireflyhero @dividendyield @colloids @radians @skeuamorphism @dihectogon @anglebisector @aau- @EditBlockColors @AdamantOrb @MoongeistBeam @festively @Ampharos_ @straightforwardness
i trolled redcat LOL
if you see this
{what method did you use::control hat;
answer on profile ::motion
} ::operators
- -Expo
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
If they had been taken out of Scratch 3.0, ST must of had a reason for it. A reason that probably looks a lot like these:
1. It has an easy workaround
2. It was virtually unused
3. it was too complicated
I hope that helped
1. It has an easy workaround
2. It was virtually unused
3. it was too complicated
I hope that helped
Hello, I'm @-Expo! I'm a veteran Scratcher and member of the Scratch translation team who has been on Scratch ever since I was four (a long time ago!) In real life, I am a proffesional footballer for the Asociación de Fútbol Argentino and Brighton. I'm a huge Huge FC Barcelona Fan and loyal subject to Rosario Central. I use scratch for coding, making friends, and helping people out. I hope you enjoy my projects!
-ExpoEspanol
Why are you here?
- medians
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
That is not why, it is mostly because the blocks were replaced (other than that, because the blocks were in removed extensions), and all at once was removed before 2.0 finished. If they had been taken out of Scratch 3.0, ST must of had a reason for it. A reason that probably looks a lot like these:
1. It has an easy workaround
2. It was virtually unused
3. it was too complicated
I hope that helped
Also, days since 2000, video blocks, switch backdrop to () and wait, next costume/backdrop, and other “virtually unused” or “easy workaround” blocks still exist.
Edit: Actually, there was also this block (which was hidden but was in a currently existing extension)
https://en.scratch-wiki.info/wiki/Play_Note_()_for_()_Seconds_(block)
And yeah, that was the real reason it was hidden.
Last edited by medians (March 29, 2024 21:16:17)
:D: 2.0 is 11 years old https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/1018259409/
Medians bamboozled by 3.0 (version 3.0): https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/979822351/
hi875230163394: You're similar to valve in that you both hate a certain number…
Scratch 0.x, 1.x, 2.x, 3.x and LogoBlocks Archives
Bamboozlement: https://scratch.mit.edu/studios/33739789
Years on internet: 15 (soon 16)
medians: Oh god not this utc - 12 thing again..
Fun_Cupcake_i81: What, were you expecting not to see the utc - 12 thing again? THE UTC - 12 THIGN ALWAYS RETURNS. ALWAYS.
medians: I knew it would happen. I was the one who started it last year.
Fun_Cupcake_i81: Well then if you didn't want it back maybe you need to time travel to last year and fix that
Oh wait if you could time travel I think we all know exactly when you would go-
user1: That picture is from 2.0. Now he’s at my house and is my pet.
user2: But this is medians we're talking about, so “from 2.0” can mean the same thing as “from five seconds ago”.
Detect Scratch version here
My other accounts: @selfexplanatory @modesties @chaircard @fireflyhero @dividendyield @colloids @radians @skeuamorphism @dihectogon @anglebisector @aau- @EditBlockColors @AdamantOrb @MoongeistBeam @festively @Ampharos_ @straightforwardness
i trolled redcat LOL
if you see this
{what method did you use::control hat;
answer on profile ::motion
} ::operators
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back