Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
- weeeeeeeyay5
-
Scratcher
41 posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
There are a lot of old 2.0 blocks that are useful or just save time. Below you can put any removed ones that you think should be brought back.
- weeeeeeeyay5
-
Scratcher
41 posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
First, I'd recommend the
all at onceblock. It saves you time by making it so you don't have to make a custom block just to run something without screen refresh.
end
- weeeeeeeyay5
-
Scratcher
41 posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
that did not come out right, i meant
oh and it continues
foreverbut with the text “all at once”.
end
oh and it continues
Last edited by weeeeeeeyay5 (March 29, 2024 18:26:14)
- weeeeeeeyay5
-
Scratcher
41 posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
Another is the “costume number” and “backdrop number” reporter blocks. These could be used to debug and for other reasons.
- RecessFailsOffical
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
Another is the “costume number” and “backdrop number” reporter blocks. These could be used to debug and for other reasons.
Those exist
(costume #)
(backdrop #)
and no lists please
- Roblox888i
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
~snip~This is not a list, a list of suggestions is unrelated to each other, so if I say I wanted to add a looks block and a control block, that's a list, but showing multiple control blocks to suggest is NOT a list
and no lists please
#5
~snip~Please add all of the things you suggested to the OP.
- medians
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
Another is the “costume number” and “backdrop number” reporter blocks. These could be used to debug and for other reasons.Those both became the costume () (which can has number and name in a dropdown) as well as backdrop () (same thing) blocks, so this will not happen.
First, I'd recommend theDuplicate:all at onceblock. It saves you time by making it so you don't have to make a custom block just to run something without screen refresh.
end
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/5690/
- -Expo
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
If they had been taken out of Scratch 3.0, ST must of had a reason for it. A reason that probably looks a lot like these:
1. It has an easy workaround
2. It was virtually unused
3. it was too complicated
I hope that helped
1. It has an easy workaround
2. It was virtually unused
3. it was too complicated
I hope that helped

- medians
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back
If they had been taken out of Scratch 3.0, ST must of had a reason for it. A reason that probably looks a lot like these:That is not why, it is mostly because the blocks were replaced (other than that, because the blocks were in removed extensions), and all at once was removed before 2.0 finished.
1. It has an easy workaround
2. It was virtually unused
3. it was too complicated
I hope that helped
Also, days since 2000, video blocks, switch backdrop to () and wait, next costume/backdrop, and other “virtually unused” or “easy workaround” blocks still exist.
Edit: Actually, there was also this block (which was hidden but was in a currently existing extension)
https://en.scratch-wiki.info/wiki/Play_Note_()_for_()_Seconds_(block)
And yeah, that was the real reason it was hidden.
Last edited by medians (March 29, 2024 21:16:17)
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
-
» Old 2.0 Blocks that Should Be Brought Back




