Discuss Scratch

EDawg2011
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

Crispydogs101 wrote:

You bumped your posted?
Yes.
k7e
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

Is this the same as this topic?
kkidslogin
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

k7e wrote:

(#42)
Is this the same as this topic?
No, they seem to be a little different.
EDawg2011
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

bump
EDawg2011
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

The ST doesn't seem to care about banning asset links in signatures, with assets being able to be abused in signatures too, so why not forum posts too? At this point, it's almost like they don't care; assets were really useful for people who didn't have any other choice for images on the forums.
kkidslogin
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

EDawg2011 wrote:

(#45)
The ST doesn't seem to care about banning asset links in signatures, with assets being able to be abused in signatures too, so why not forum posts too? At this point, it's almost like they don't care; assets were really useful for people who didn't have any other choice for images on the forums.
False. Don't let this get out to the trolls, but signatures don't have any sort of filterbot at all, as far as I can tell.
gdfsgdfsgdfg
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

get image is censored but not assets
which also means upload is censored too
so support this suggestion cuz upload doesn’t do harm yet its censored

Last edited by gdfsgdfsgdfg (Jan. 29, 2024 14:11:50)

PaperMarioFan2022
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

gdfsgdfsgdfg wrote:

get image is censored but not assets
which also means upload and cdn is censored too
I thought that cdn was working.
gdfsgdfsgdfg
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

PaperMarioFan2022 wrote:

I thought that cdn was working.
oh wait cuz the wiki use get image at end of a sub domain

Last edited by gdfsgdfsgdfg (Jan. 29, 2024 14:11:29)

EDawg2011
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

bring up my post
mumu245
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

glitcX wrote:

(#1)
most scratchers use SCHOOL DEVICES
This is an exagerration. In most countries there isn't 1 PC per student (or only in one class, but that's not enough to browse the forums). Even though I still support your suggestion. Probably 25% still use school devices.
mumu245
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

whoops

Last edited by mumu245 (March 1, 2024 13:38:33)

hydrofungus
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

It wasn't meant to be an image host in the first place
starlightsparker
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

DifferentDance8 wrote:

k7e wrote:

This still may be rejected.

Za-Chary wrote:

9.5 Allow files to be uploaded into forum posts
The Scratch Team would have to pay for storage of these files, and they only have a limited amount of resources to do so. Storage space would be better allocated toward Scratch projects, anyway. There is also the issue of someone uploading a file that can potentially cause harm to someone's computer. Searching through these files would require significantly more moderation work, and there are not enough moderators able to do the job at the moment.
Images don't waste that much space. A 1080P PNG picture only takes up around 2MB of storage. A project, especially those as massive as Chirpy Reverie, takes up a lot more space.
And multiply that by 1000. Thats 2 GB of storage. Still a fairly large amount
mumu245
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

starlightsparker wrote:

(#54)

DifferentDance8 wrote:

k7e wrote:

This still may be rejected.

Za-Chary wrote:

9.5 Allow files to be uploaded into forum posts
The Scratch Team would have to pay for storage of these files, and they only have a limited amount of resources to do so. Storage space would be better allocated toward Scratch projects, anyway. There is also the issue of someone uploading a file that can potentially cause harm to someone's computer. Searching through these files would require significantly more moderation work, and there are not enough moderators able to do the job at the moment.
Images don't waste that much space. A 1080P PNG picture only takes up around 2MB of storage. A project, especially those as massive as Chirpy Reverie, takes up a lot more space.
And multiply that by 1000. Thats 2 GB of storage. Still a fairly large amount

And a project takes 50MB of storage.
starlightsparker
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

mumu245 wrote:

mumu245 wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

(#54)

DifferentDance8 wrote:

k7e wrote:

This still may be rejected.

Za-Chary wrote:

9.5 Allow files to be uploaded into forum posts
The Scratch Team would have to pay for storage of these files, and they only have a limited amount of resources to do so. Storage space would be better allocated toward Scratch projects, anyway. There is also the issue of someone uploading a file that can potentially cause harm to someone's computer. Searching through these files would require significantly more moderation work, and there are not enough moderators able to do the job at the moment.
Images don't waste that much space. A 1080P PNG picture only takes up around 2MB of storage. A project, especially those as massive as Chirpy Reverie, takes up a lot more space.
And multiply that by 1000. Thats 2 GB of storage. Still a fairly large amount

And a project takes 50MB of storage.
wait really?_
the_awsome_penguinja
Scratcher
500+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

mumu245 wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

(#54)

DifferentDance8 wrote:

k7e wrote:

This still may be rejected.

Za-Chary wrote:

9.5 Allow files to be uploaded into forum posts
The Scratch Team would have to pay for storage of these files, and they only have a limited amount of resources to do so. Storage space would be better allocated toward Scratch projects, anyway. There is also the issue of someone uploading a file that can potentially cause harm to someone's computer. Searching through these files would require significantly more moderation work, and there are not enough moderators able to do the job at the moment.
Images don't waste that much space. A 1080P PNG picture only takes up around 2MB of storage. A project, especially those as massive as Chirpy Reverie, takes up a lot more space.
And multiply that by 1000. Thats 2 GB of storage. Still a fairly large amount

And a project takes 50MB of storage.
multiplied by the amount of project shared is 7.6petabytes
starlightsparker
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

the_awsome_penguinja wrote:

mumu245 wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

(#54)

DifferentDance8 wrote:

k7e wrote:

This still may be rejected.

Za-Chary wrote:

9.5 Allow files to be uploaded into forum posts
The Scratch Team would have to pay for storage of these files, and they only have a limited amount of resources to do so. Storage space would be better allocated toward Scratch projects, anyway. There is also the issue of someone uploading a file that can potentially cause harm to someone's computer. Searching through these files would require significantly more moderation work, and there are not enough moderators able to do the job at the moment.
Images don't waste that much space. A 1080P PNG picture only takes up around 2MB of storage. A project, especially those as massive as Chirpy Reverie, takes up a lot more space.
And multiply that by 1000. Thats 2 GB of storage. Still a fairly large amount

And a project takes 50MB of storage.
multiplied by the amount of project shared is 7.6petabytes
thats crazy….
if scratch could afford that i bet they could afford images so i retract my statement
support
kkidslogin
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

mumu245 wrote:

(#55)

starlightsparker wrote:

(#54)

DifferentDance8 wrote:

k7e wrote:

This still may be rejected.

Za-Chary wrote:

9.5 Allow files to be uploaded into forum posts
The Scratch Team would have to pay for storage of these files, and they only have a limited amount of resources to do so. Storage space would be better allocated toward Scratch projects, anyway. There is also the issue of someone uploading a file that can potentially cause harm to someone's computer. Searching through these files would require significantly more moderation work, and there are not enough moderators able to do the job at the moment.
Images don't waste that much space. A 1080P PNG picture only takes up around 2MB of storage. A project, especially those as massive as Chirpy Reverie, takes up a lot more space.
And multiply that by 1000. Thats 2 GB of storage. Still a fairly large amount

And a project takes 50MB of storage.
False, projects take however much they need. A small one I just downloaded takes 4.8 MB, while Appel is 11.5 MB, PTE++ is just 183 KB, and AspectOS 0.33 Beta is 84.1 MB. It varies.
PaperMarioFan2022
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Rethink Blocking Scratch as an Image Host

hydrofungus wrote:

It wasn't meant to be an image host in the first place
True, but as a still-relevant topic, assets was used as one.

Powered by DjangoBB