CodeLearnerSai wrote:

Make these changes to Scratch Wiki:Blocking:

These bans should only be applied after the user has been notified on their talk page at least once for their malicious behavior actions (and in many cases, multiple times) and continued it anyway, except in egregious cases such as obvious vandalism where the user should be blocked to prevent further damage.

Legend:
added
removed

CodeLearnerSai wrote:

On “Scratch Wiki:Blocking,” in the section “What an appeal should not contain,” can you make the changes:
Legend:
removed
added

• Rude, disrespectful, or inappropriate language
  
• Attempts to sidestep responsibility or shift blame onto others
  
• Nitpicking the reasons that led to the ban or any other actions by others
  
• Lying or misrepresentation to appear in a more favorable light
  
• Attempts to convince Wiki administration to unblock in order to increase chances of becoming unblocked
  

The reason I want to modify the second line is because this could include accepting blame while also blaming others.
The reason I want to add this line is because users should respect the decision of the Wiki administration if their appeal is denied.

CodeLearnerSai wrote:

Why is no one making the edits I'm suggesting here?

JaxonisJasxin125 wrote:

Hey I kinda have a question, does scratch take down the copy project if you reuploaded a project you made that was taken down.

ninjahanzo wrote:

hi, someone has been adding weird dream (what?) references and skibidi toilet references to af pages, is that okay? not everyone likes these things and people who don't know will not get it

Example 1
“I severely vandalized multiple articles on the wiki, such as ‘Ban’ and ‘Account Deletion.’”
This appeal does not provide assurance that the user will refrain from the behavior that lead to the block if they are unblocked.
Example 2
"I edit warred on ‘Finding Direction with Velocity’ and ‘Flame War,’ when the Bold, Revert, Discuss policy did apply. In the future, if someone reverts my edit and I wish to put it back, I will start a discussion.
Also, please do not make blocks for edit-warring if the edits involved in an edit war unless the edit is not vandalism at all."
This appeal nitpicks the block and contains an attempted excuse.
Example 3
"I promise not to be disrespectful towards other editors by maintaining calmness in my actions, so unblock me or (example threat)!"
This appeal contains rude language and also does not describe what the user did wrong.
Example 4
“I have been making a significant amount of constructive edits, so unblock me.”
This appeal does not contain any of the items under “What an appeal should contain.”
Example 5
"This is my first time posting inappropriate content. Regardless, I will not try to do such things again."
This appeal does not show that a user accepts responsibility for their actions and also contains misrepresentation.

CodeLearnerSai wrote:

On Scratch Forums (1.4), replace “Netherlands” with “Dutch”.

ninjahanzo wrote:

hi, someone has been adding weird dream (what?) references and skibidi toilet references to af pages, is that okay? not everyone likes these things and people who don't know will not get it

Kqax wrote:

I had requested an account about a month ago and no one had contacted me if I was approved or disapproved. I checked if my request was active, and it didn't show up.

AfraidRacer wrote:

AAAH! The Scratch Wiki has turned PURPLE!

jackson2cypher wrote:

(#4830)
Yeah I know, I liked blue so much better

MrMarvel_FAN wrote:

(#4832)
WHY IS THE SCRATCH WIKI PURPLE!

Kqax wrote:

ninjahanzo wrote:

hi, someone has been adding weird dream (what?) references and skibidi toilet references to af pages, is that okay? not everyone likes these things and people who don't know will not get it

Link? ( for one )

7salad3salad wrote:

it's been purple literally forever

Markohan wrote:

(#4836)

7salad3salad wrote:

it's been purple literally forever

But since first releasement of 3.0 there was blue one. What's the date of updation to purple?