Bump

Edit: KOTP!!

TheUltimateHoodie wrote:

don't support. just no. just no.

Why?

I see no harm this can cause
On the other hand, “if you hate” should not be banned, for example, a project named “like if you hate homework” is not offensive in any way

What about “If you hate Microsoft”, “If you hate @user, change your mind” or others?

mumu245 wrote:

What about “If you hate Microsoft”, “If you hate @user, change your mind” or others?

“If you hate Microsoft” does not contain an “@” symbol. I have never seen the second one come up ever.

bump

bump

Imagine someone just hates that symbol
“If you hate @ symbol”
Or someone protesting
“Stop making ”If you hate @(user)“ projects!”


What if someone does this:

• "If you hate the @(username)"
  
• "If you hate the user @(username)"
  
• “If you hate (username)” No @ symbol
  
• "If you hate this user > @(username)"
  
• "If you hate this user" The name of the user is inside the project instead
  

And the word “user” in these examples can be replaced with many other words such as “person” or “guy”, and “If you” can be replaced with “I”. This problem possibly makes the suggestion harder and longer to add to scratch.

qwerty_wasd_gone wrote:

Imagine someone just hates that symbol
“If you hate @ symbol”
Or someone protesting
“Stop making ”If you hate @(user)“ projects!”


What if someone does this:

• "If you hate the @(username)"
  
• "If you hate the user @(username)"
  
• “If you hate (username)” No @ symbol
  
• "If you hate this user > @(username)"
  
• "If you hate this user" The name of the user is inside the project instead
  

And the word “user” in these examples can be replaced with many other words such as “person” or “guy”, and “If you” can be replaced with “I”. This problem possibly makes the suggestion harder and longer to add to scratch.

1. Thats quite rare, it could always be whitelisted
2. Thats not allowed as its gossip (I think)
3. Those would be censored as well as the filterbot, though stupid, isn't that stupid (for example, if “cat” was censored, we all know “c a t” and “catty” would also be censored, and likely also would “c|at”

bmupmp

Caramels_Secrets wrote:

Support. Imagine you found a studio saying, “Follow if you hate @Caramels_Secrets!” Your username is Caramels_Secrets.

and if its not?

TheEpikGamer211 wrote:

Caramels_Secrets wrote:

Support. Imagine you found a studio saying, “Follow if you hate @Caramels_Secrets!” Your username is Caramels_Secrets.

and if its not?

it's still hate which not allowed

among_us1w2 wrote:

TheEpikGamer211 wrote:

Caramels_Secrets wrote:

Support. Imagine you found a studio saying, “Follow if you hate @Caramels_Secrets!” Your username is Caramels_Secrets.

and if its not?

it's still hate which not allowed

good point.
anyway, did i ever support.
cuz I do.

i wasnt clear with my first post on this thread:
dont support, just use contact us, its an unneccesary feature. at most auto NFE the project.

TheUltimateHoodie wrote:

i wasnt clear with my first post on this thread:
dont support, just use contact us, its an unneccesary feature. at most auto NFE the project.

bruh its just adding 1 word to filter

If the phrase “If you hate @(user)” gets banned then “If @(user) is someone you hate” and “If you dislike @(user)” and “If @(user) is someone you dislike” should get banned too.

No support. I feel like just reporting those projects works better than trying to filter them outright.
People could just not include the @, but if we decided to ban “If you hate (x)” altogether it could block much more lighthearted projects, such as “Favorite if you hate homework!”

among_us1w2 wrote:

(#35)
bruh its just adding 1 word to filter

The effectiveness of this suggestion would practically be null - There are enough synonyms and ways to go around this, doing it is basically pointless.

ehh no support.

It seams too easy to bypass, almost no changed would happen. It'll just make people bypass. Yes, people being able to bypass shouldn't immediately destroy a suggestion, but if it doesn't help much… Then I don't know

The-Sushi-Cat wrote:

ehh no support.

It seams too easy to bypass, almost no changed would happen. It'll just make people bypass. Yes, people being able to bypass shouldn't immediately destroy a suggestion, but if it doesn't help much… Then I don't know

Nirvana fallacy, you are comparing it to a perfect solution. It is meant to help control, not eradicate completely.

Either way, this makes a bit of sense even if I haven't seen many studios with it.