Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Questions about Scratch
- » Snap! vs Scratch
- roofogato
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Snap! vs Scratch
(heres the ss of the post i wanted to make cuz scratch wouldnt let me post?)
anyways this is a question

anyways this is a question

- unmissable
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Snap! vs Scratch
Huh. I thought you could say it.
wait 60 seconds!!¡
- ScratchCat1038
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Snap! vs Scratch
The main difference is that Snap has more complex features, such as making your own variables and booleans, as well as JavaScript blocks. It also uses the 1.0 block style.
- gdfsgdfsgdfg
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Snap! vs Scratch
is it another filter misfire or is it the end part
- roofogato
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Snap! vs Scratch
is it another filter misfire or is it the end part
i don't know, the reporting comments bugs forum is down now…
- 106809nes
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Snap! vs Scratch
(heres the ss of the post i wanted to make cuz scratch wouldnt let me post?)When you said “shh” at the end, they thought you were gonna say the other word for crap
anyways this is a question
- roofogato
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Snap! vs Scratch
(heres the ss of the post i wanted to make cuz scratch wouldnt let me post?)When you said “shh” at the end, they thought you were gonna say the other word for crap
anyways this is a question
huh, that seems irrational, since “shhh” is a common expression
- DifferentDance8
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Snap! vs Scratch
Strange.. the filter seems to think that the final 5 characters in your post was trying to say the other word for crap. You might want to send this to the ST via Contact Us, because if they fixed “fox oc” (which is also relatively common on Scratch) then pretty sure they can fix “shhh”
In terms of the question at hand, a notable distinction lies in Snap!'s more advanced system for custom blocks compared to Scratch. This improvement is particularly evident in the flexibility it offers, allowing users to alter block shapes from stacks to booleans or reporters. It's worth mentioning that the italicized exclamation mark within Snap!'s branding is a deliberate element, as reflected in its logo.
Regrettably, Snap! presents a challenge with its UI, notably diverging significantly from both Scratch 3.0 and 2.0. Even enthusiasts of Scratch 2.0, such as @medians, may find Snap! less preferable due to these substantial differences in user interface design.
In terms of the question at hand, a notable distinction lies in Snap!'s more advanced system for custom blocks compared to Scratch. This improvement is particularly evident in the flexibility it offers, allowing users to alter block shapes from stacks to booleans or reporters. It's worth mentioning that the italicized exclamation mark within Snap!'s branding is a deliberate element, as reflected in its logo.
Regrettably, Snap! presents a challenge with its UI, notably diverging significantly from both Scratch 3.0 and 2.0. Even enthusiasts of Scratch 2.0, such as @medians, may find Snap! less preferable due to these substantial differences in user interface design.
- roofogato
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Snap! vs Scratch
snip
whomst bump
Anyway, I've mostly forgotten about this topic, so unless anyway wants to come in with an amazing groundbreaking answer between the different im gonna close this now
- Discussion Forums
- » Questions about Scratch
-
» Snap! vs Scratch





