this is the wrong word but i want to call “logistics”.
here's the situation
the filter is essentially cleanspeak, a piece of software that costed $3500 per month in 2020.
the site uses cleanspeak in the backend
the online project editor could use cleanspeak, but unfortunately, the offline editor cannot - it's just not possible to put such an implementation in the editor
then again, could it be so that the server, on project upload/import (into the online editor) would check every custom input, asset and comment for obscene/inappropriate content?
but i'm sure that the server ripping apart a zip file each time such is uploaded from the offline editor would get more computationally expensive
but then again, it might already be doing that
i'm on the fence, so my conclusion is:
if it's not too expensive, then sure, but i think there may be some drawbacks (cleanspeak is not at all good when it comes to accuracy), and i'm not entirely sure how great the benefit is.
the point of the st using a filter is so that they are compliant with coppa while also allowing u13s to use the site

Banana

Advanced projects make use of randomly generated alphabetical IDs that might generate a swear word by complete chance, and while most of them probably wouldn't break if the swear was replaced with asterisks, it's not a good idea to risk it. The performance of the filter also matters - the filter could slow down many performance-intensive projects.

This would badly glitch advanced projects. No support at all

LP372 wrote:

This would badly glitch advanced projects. No support at all

It could just activate only when the project is shared or sth, the original poster hasn't said in the current original post that it would continuously run.

medians wrote:

LP372 wrote:

This would badly glitch advanced projects. No support at all

It could just activate only when the project is shared or sth, the original poster hasn't said in the current original post that it would continuously run.

Still no

LP372 wrote:

medians wrote:

LP372 wrote:

This would badly glitch advanced projects. No support at all

It could just activate only when the project is shared or sth, the original poster hasn't said in the current original post that it would continuously run.

Still no

Okay, how would it glitch advanced projects then?

medians wrote:

LP372 wrote:

medians wrote:

LP372 wrote:

This would badly glitch advanced projects. No support at all

It could just activate only when the project is shared or sth, the original poster hasn't said in the current original post that it would continuously run.

Still no

Okay, how would it glitch advanced projects then?

the variable values would change, so it'd have to check that