__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

(#17)
TAKE THAT! If the condition is something that will be different when it reaches the final part of the code then it needs to break the loop there so the condition is the same.
this is not a good argument but I am trying to get this suggestion accepted now, whatever it may take

quadruple_door wrote:

Stop(this loop v) ::control

this would be a scratch block that when used, does what it says, breaks out of a loop!

(example)
|
|
|
V

when green flag clicked
set [my variable v] to [0]
set [ random variable v] to (pick random (1) to (900))
repeat (900)
change [my variable v] by (1)
if < (my variable)  =  (random variable) > then
Stop(this loop v) ::control

end

end
do whatever now

(for context, if a loop is inside a loop it wont stop both loops, only the one its in.)
(this wont do anything outside a loop)

WindowsMeRules2000 wrote:

I am extremely confident this is a dupe but i’m too lazy to search

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

CrazyCoder1247 wrote:

Scratchcat12562 wrote:

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Scratchcat12562 wrote:

stop [this script v]

This block exists already

why aren't kids more smarter?
They mean break out of the current loop, not break out of the current script/stop the script.

oh i understand now this would be pretty useful for stuff

first of all, __Falcon-Games__, be nice, second of all, look:

repeat until <>

end

amazing, right?

1. I am being nice, I was just wondering a question which I put in small tags which didn't have to be noticed by anyone which wasn't meant to cause any offense
2. What does that have to do with this suggestion?

ajskateboarder wrote:

WindowsMeRules2000 wrote:

I am extremely confident this is a dupe but i’m too lazy to search

This is indeed a duplicate of this topic by the god-tier forumer, theonlygusti