cs3868895 wrote:

rdococ wrote:

An AI extension would fit right in with the other extensions allowing Scratch to interface with other technologies. I could imagine guessing games, chatbots with characters, maybe even some kind of AI Dungeon, etc.

But you can't just leave it at a ‘chat with AI’ block. Projects might want to test if the user or AI response means something in particular, or even allow the AI to control a particular sprite for something like an autonomous boss fight, or maybe an RPG where the NPCs are actually alive.

So, there should also be blocks for probing into the AI's brain and seeing what it's thinking. The full suite of blocks could be something like:

reset AI :: pen // Causes the AI to forget everything so far.

tell the AI [how do you do?] :: pen // Tells the AI something.

(response from AI :: pen) // Gets the AI's response to something it's been told.

(what the AI thinks [] is :: pen) // Probes the AI's brain to see what the AI thinks about something.

<the AI thinks [] :: pen> // Determines if the AI thinks something is true.

<[] means [] :: pen> // Uses the AI to check if a particular statement or phrase implies/includes another.

You could make an animal guessing game like so:

when I receive [think of an animal v]
ask [Think of an animal!] and wait
if <not <the AI thinks (join (answer) [ is an animal]) :: pen>> then
say [That's not an animal!] for (2) secs
broadcast [think of an animal v] and wait
end
set [animal v] to (answer)
set [guesses v] to [0]
forever
tell the AI [The player is thinking of an animal. Ask a yes/no question or make a guess.] :: pen
if <the AI thinks [I just made a guess] :: pen> then
change [guesses v] by (1)
say (join [OK, I will guess a ] (what the AI thinks [the animal I've just guessed] is :: pen)) for (2) secs
if <[the animal I just guessed] means (animal) :: pen> then
say (join (join [I guessed correctly in ] (guesses)) [guesses!]) for (2) secs
stop [this script v]
else
say [Darn.] for (2) secs
end
else
ask (response from AI :: pen) and wait
tell the AI (join [The player answered: ] (answer)) :: pen
end
end

Will there be a possibility where it says an orange is an animal-
An ai can't possibly say that right?

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

The ai category

cs3868895 wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

This is in creaticode

Pls don't try to link extensions, that's not the point-

Crispydogs101 wrote:

(#7)
Chat GTP is unmoderated so it can say bad words which is my concern about this feature unless openAI makes it so it can't say the bad words. So far idk if this can be able to be useful and not used to cheat the purpose of scratch (like if it can generate a whole entire project). So idk if AI would be the best idea to improve the current version of Scratch. (Also, I'm not saying anything about 4.0 since 3.0 is still a work in progress)

J4ol wrote:

(#286)

Crispydogs101 wrote:

(#7)
Chat GTP is unmoderated so it can say bad words which is my concern about this feature unless openAI makes it so it can't say the bad words. So far idk if this can be able to be useful and not used to cheat the purpose of scratch (like if it can generate a whole entire project). So idk if AI would be the best idea to improve the current version of Scratch. (Also, I'm not saying anything about 4.0 since 3.0 is still a work in progress)

Chat GPI Is moderated. It filters anything bad, and won't let you ask bad things

DifferentDance8 wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

The ai category

Please provide an image of this “AI category” and where I can access it.

OnTheCode99 wrote:

No support. That defeats the whole purpose of scratch. You are supposed to code, not have AI do it for you.

daniels471-2nd wrote:

OnTheCode99 wrote:

No support. That defeats the whole purpose of scratch. You are supposed to code, not have AI do it for you.

I'm talking about blocks that the ai gives an answer to a thing, not the ai coding a project.

medians wrote:

daniels471-2nd wrote:

OnTheCode99 wrote:

No support. That defeats the whole purpose of scratch. You are supposed to code, not have AI do it for you.

I'm talking about blocks that the ai gives an answer to a thing, not the ai coding a project.

What if they just ask ChatGPT to create the project?

daniels471-2nd wrote:

medians wrote:

daniels471-2nd wrote:

OnTheCode99 wrote:

No support. That defeats the whole purpose of scratch. You are supposed to code, not have AI do it for you.

I'm talking about blocks that the ai gives an answer to a thing, not the ai coding a project.

What if they just ask ChatGPT to create the project?

ChatGPT would not accept it.

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

cs3868895 wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

This is in creaticode

Pls don't try to link extensions, that's not the point-

Creati code isn’t an extension, it’s a scratch remake

when green flag clicked
forever
find scratch mods :: variables

OnTheCode99 wrote:

No support. That defeats the whole purpose of scratch. You are supposed to code, not have AI do it for you.

poptko wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

cs3868895 wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

This is in creaticode

Pls don't try to link extensions, that's not the point-

Creati code isn’t an extension, it’s a scratch remake

No it's not a scratch remake it's like scratch but it's not a scratch remake

when green flag clicked
forever
find scratch mods :: variables

DifferentDance8 wrote:

Isn't this in Gandi? (AI Hub)

wer65hertg wrote:

(#9)
This would cost a lot of money for API calls, and the ST would have to pay for that, so no support.
ChatGPT would also make mistakes and swear, which would be incredibly difficult to combat.