Okay, I'm back, with a design of a project page!

I mean, I doubt that they would have a TurboWarp button because it’s not affiliated with Scratch.
Also, where is the share date?

medians wrote:

I mean, I doubt that they would have a TurboWarp button because it’s not affiliated with Scratch.
Also, where is the share date?

You need to hover over the project title to view the share date, and the modification date

This is more like you redesigning Scratch, because the project page itself is the same. Only the colors are different, and it looks a lot less unique and more basic.

No support we don't need this at all. Also 3.1 already happened.

pyromoose wrote:

medians wrote:

I mean, I doubt that they would have a TurboWarp button because it’s not affiliated with Scratch.
Also, where is the share date?

You need to hover over the project title to view the share date, and the modification date

…Yeah, I think that should be the full title or something instead since I don't see a lot of people knowing that.
And you used to be able to see the last modified date without the api (there's an extension that I can't mention due to the policy [i checked without them okay] that allows you to hover over the share date to see this now though)
https://web.archive.org/web/201408/scratch.mit.edu/projects/104

sonic__fan wrote:

This is more like you redesigning Scratch, because the project page itself is the same. Only the colors are different, and it looks a lot less unique and more basic.

Not to mention the I am canonically dead because of the gradients. It also has more elements that are unrelated to scratch and changed things so that it's harder and more unintuitive(what's the word) to access certain data.

Also, I noticed this, but where's the explore navbar button LOL

-Valtren- wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

This is more like you redesigning Scratch, because the project page itself is the same. Only the colors are different, and it looks a lot less unique and more basic.

Not to mention the I am canonically dead because of the gradients. It also has more elements that are unrelated to scratch and changed things so that it's harder and more unintuitive(what's the word) to access certain data.

I mean, to be fair I am medians, though whenever I'm signed out and my mouse is over the “join scratch”, I expect there to be a gradient, then I remember they removed it.
Also, is the volume thing just supposed to be from forbidden word?

My reaction.

The reason is because the fact it's like it was made in 1999 and it looks very unnatural for a website. It looks like if scratch was made in 2 hours.

mexicans (this is a joke) wrote:

Also, is the volume thing just supposed to be from forbidden word?

Yes, also the pause button and the TurboWarp button is supposed to be from forbidden stuff.

Oh great heavens the gradients

Ouch. My eyes hurt now. That is waaaaaay too much contrast. Also, that is just a normal project page, but with no rounded corners, bad colour changes, and annoying gradients. Also, the padding size isn't even consistent. It's a 1990s student's side project that was made in 30 minutes. No support.

I still have a big feeling that they said “3.1” because they knew if they said something like “4.0”, people would say stuff like “there are no current plans for 4.0”.

BloatedUnderpants3 wrote:

Ouch. My eyes hurt now. That is waaaaaay too much contrast. Also, that is just a normal project page, but with no rounded corners, bad colour changes, and annoying gradients. Also, the padding size isn't even consistent. It's a 1990s student's side project that was made in 30 minutes. No support.

Honestly it's hard for me to remember what it looks like in 3.0, but without the comments icon or number, TurboWarp, pause, volume, and some other button, the remix number in a different place, rather than next to “Remixes”?

medians wrote:

I still have a big feeling that they said “3.1” because they knew if they said something like “4.0”, people would say stuff like “there are no current plans for 4.0”.

BloatedUnderpants3 wrote:

Ouch. My eyes hurt now. That is waaaaaay too much contrast. Also, that is just a normal project page, but with no rounded corners, bad colour changes, and annoying gradients. Also, the padding size isn't even consistent. It's a 1990s student's side project that was made in 30 minutes. No support.

Honestly it's hard for me to remember what it looks like in 3.0, but without the comments icon or number, TurboWarp, pause, volume, and some other button, the remix number in a different place, rather than next to “Remixes”?

but they miscalculated the fact that by saying “3.1”, people instead say “3.1 already passed”

(we are currently using scratch like 3.3 or something)

My honest reaction:

LOL yeah I know, I've seen (they probably had no idea though because the wiki article refers to it as 3.0 still, and many people as well). They've made so many suggestions on these though, and they've been closed.
Also wow you're using my weird image XDDDDD

The TurboWarp button is straight up a screenshot from a browser extension (don’t name it) , it’s not even gradient.

tbh. Would would be the point of changing the project page? I really see no point of changing the project page design. Also some of the buttons blend to much with the very light blue. It looks a bit too harsh. Overall. I prefer the 3.0.

medians wrote:

Honestly it's hard for me to remember what it looks like in 3.0, but without the comments icon or number, TurboWarp, pause, volume, and some other button, the remix number in a different place, rather than next to “Remixes”?

Did I get bamboozled
Also, the love and favorites in a different place technically.

medians wrote:

medians wrote:

Honestly it's hard for me to remember what it looks like in 3.0, but without the comments icon or number, TurboWarp, pause, volume, and some other button, the remix number in a different place, rather than next to “Remixes”?

Did I get bamboozled

Yes

My reaction to this:

With the jokes aside this is way too much contrast for the eyes, you can barely see any scroll buttons in the instructions and note and credits part of the project.
Uploaded by imageshack.