I already changed the homepage, so that means it's time for the profile page for Scratch 3.1.
,

Like we’ve said before we’re in scratch 3.5 and this hasn’t been added yet.

rejected:

TOLORS wrote:

2.1 Adding users to work on projects
Having multiple Scratchers work on the same project would be difficult to moderate not only due to technological limitations but also because it could lead to private messaging; for more information, see #7.1 on this list. This suggestion includes live editing (similar to Google Docs) and other forms of private collaboration. If you would like to work on a project with another Scratcher, you can remix each others' projects.

At the moment, a turn-based collaboration system for shared projects is NOT rejected; you can discuss it on this topic.

8.3 Show when users are online
This suggestion refers to some sort of indicator that lets you know if a user is currently online. The Scratch Team has discussed it and has decided that it is not something that can benefit Scratch as an educational platform. Between making projects, sharing projects, and viewing projects, an online indicator is not much help in these areas.

also this isn't the 2000s man remove the gradients and add some squircles

-Valtren- wrote:

rejected:

TOLORS wrote:

2.1 Adding users to work on projects
Having multiple Scratchers work on the same project would be difficult to moderate not only due to technological limitations but also because it could lead to private messaging; for more information, see #7.1 on this list. This suggestion includes live editing (similar to Google Docs) and other forms of private collaboration. If you would like to work on a project with another Scratcher, you can remix each others' projects.

At the moment, a turn-based collaboration system for shared projects is NOT rejected; you can discuss it on this topic.

8.3 Show when users are online
This suggestion refers to some sort of indicator that lets you know if a user is currently online. The Scratch Team has discussed it and has decided that it is not something that can benefit Scratch as an educational platform. Between making projects, sharing projects, and viewing projects, an online indicator is not much help in these areas.

also this isn't the 2000s man remove the gradients and add some squircles

I like the gradients on the pages so I'm keeping that.

No support, looks very cramped.

I recognize that font but forget what it is.
Also, why would the featured projects thing have the green flag, the stop sign, forbidden word's pause button, the Instructions, and the Notes and Credits?

k7e wrote:

I recognize that font but forget what it is.
Also, why would the featured projects thing have the green flag, the stop sign, forbidden word's pause button, the Instructions, and the Notes and Credits?

Because I want the featured project to be playable
Also the font is Source Sans Pro.

pyromoose wrote:

k7e wrote:

I recognize that font but forget what it is.
Also, why would the featured projects thing have the green flag, the stop sign, forbidden word's pause button, the Instructions, and the Notes and Credits?

Because I want the featured project to be playable
Also the font is Source Sans Pro.

It is if you share it and click on it.

Ignoring the fact that this is technically a list of features(?) and the fact that I doubt scratch is getting a visual redesign soon, the design itself just isn’t very… modern? All the edges are square, gaps are inconsistent, gradients are not consistent and look outdated and everything is cramped. Also, this might just be personal, but I really don’t like websites where you have to scroll vertically and horizontally. Also, the colour scheme just seems random.

Why would they make just very major changes though and call it 3.1?
And are you suggesting to move the green flag and stop sign to the left and the fullscreen button to the right?

BuzzedOut wrote:

Ignoring the fact that this is technically a list of features(?) and the fact that I doubt scratch is getting a visual redesign soon, the design itself just isn’t very… modern? All the edges are square, gaps are inconsistent, gradients are not consistent and look outdated and everything is cramped. Also, this might just be personal, but I really don’t like websites where you have to scroll vertically and horizontally. Also, the colour scheme just seems random.

what
Also, it is cramped in my opinion, though. Maybe remove stuff to make space or resize it though.

k7e wrote:

I recognize that font but forget what it is.
Also, why would the featured projects thing have the green flag, the stop sign, forbidden word's pause button, the Instructions, and the Notes and Credits?

Hold on, does the featured projects no longer run the project, with the green flag and stop sign (though not all of the other stuff, and it would make sense if it wasn’t a thing anymore)

medians wrote:

- snip -

BuzzedOut wrote:

Ignoring the fact that this is technically a list of features(?) and the fact that I doubt scratch is getting a visual redesign soon, the design itself just isn’t very… modern? All the edges are square, gaps are inconsistent, gradients are not consistent and look outdated and everything is cramped. Also, this might just be personal, but I really don’t like websites where you have to scroll vertically and horizontally. Also, the colour scheme just seems random.

what
- snip -)

It’s kind of a list of suggestions as it has a few features that aren’t in scratch already… also I was just saying that the website design could be a little more consistent (sorry if that sound rude, it’s not meant to)

pyromoose wrote:

I already changed the homepage, so that means it's time for the profile page for Scratch 3.1.
,

yeahh personally the current page is alot nicer

pyromoose wrote:

I already changed the homepage, so that means it's time for the profile page for Scratch 3.1.
,

personally to make it look better i would get rid of the gradients and make everything more rounded
plus i would make everything smaller since the boxes are so damn unnecesarily big

they are working on it
also no support

-Valtren- wrote:

rejected:

TOLORS wrote:

2.1 Adding users to work on projects
Having multiple Scratchers work on the same project would be difficult to moderate not only due to technological limitations but also because it could lead to private messaging; for more information, see #7.1 on this list. This suggestion includes live editing (similar to Google Docs) and other forms of private collaboration. If you would like to work on a project with another Scratcher, you can remix each others' projects.

At the moment, a turn-based collaboration system for shared projects is NOT rejected; you can discuss it on this topic.

8.3 Show when users are online
This suggestion refers to some sort of indicator that lets you know if a user is currently online. The Scratch Team has discussed it and has decided that it is not something that can benefit Scratch as an educational platform. Between making projects, sharing projects, and viewing projects, an online indicator is not much help in these areas.

First reason

Second reason:
We don’t need gradient
Too cool for 2020s

Feels too unfamiliar. Where Explore Tab? Also, the color scheme just doesn't fit with everything else. Take the Studio Update into account, it didn't actually change all that much visually. This feels too extreme. Just for fun, I am

medians wrote:

Hold on, does the featured projects no longer run the project, with the green flag and stop sign (though not all of the other stuff, and it would make sense if it wasn’t a thing anymore)

Bamboozled by 2.0 once again. /lh

But also this is something you could have easily just checked…

“It’s evolving, just backwards”

This looks like it was from scratch 1.4 to me lol
That gradient especially

Za-Chary wrote:

medians wrote:

Hold on, does the featured projects no longer run the project, with the green flag and stop sign (though not all of the other stuff, and it would make sense if it wasn’t a thing anymore)

Bamboozled by 2.0 once again. /lh

But also this is something you could have easily just checked…

Yeah I did later but like was this removed in the release of 3.0 or earlier on or..
Also do you mean 3.0 LOL
I mean I guess I was double bamboozled too because I remembered about my extension that brings back the position of the green flag and fullscreen after posting:

medians wrote:

And are you suggesting to move the green flag and stop sign to the left and the fullscreen button to the right?

7salad3salad wrote:

Feels too unfamiliar. Where Explore Tab? Also, the color scheme just doesn't fit with everything else. Take the Studio Update into account, it didn't actually change all that much visually. This feels too extreme. Just for fun, I am

It's too cramped so the explore tab isn't there (though honestly that's probably for the better right now so)
also I have no idea what the new studios even look like lol, and there used to be another suggestion this person made with a homepage with this design but it got closed for being a list of suggestions.
It looks way too different from 3.0 though that it seems like they were trying to make a 4.0 suggestion without people saying that 4.0 won't release soon.

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

“It’s evolving, just backwards”

This looks like it was from scratch 1.4 to me lol
That gradient especially

I mean 1.x's website layout does actually look pretty cool LOL

medians wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

“It’s evolving, just backwards”

This looks like it was from scratch 1.4 to me lol
That gradient especially

I mean 1.x's website layout does actually look pretty cool LOL

Yea but this ain’t it lol

Za-Chary wrote:

medians wrote:

Hold on, does the featured projects no longer run the project, with the green flag and stop sign (though not all of the other stuff, and it would make sense if it wasn’t a thing anymore)

Bamboozled by 2.0 once again. /lh

But also this is something you could have easily just checked…

props to you sticking to the tone tags for a week