Za-Chary wrote:

2.4 Revert back to older versions of the Scratch editor
The Scratch editor has to update sometimes to accommodate certain changes. In particular, an online editor that ran off of Adobe Flash (rather than Java) was added in the Scratch 2.0 editor, and the Scratch 3.0 editor was created for tablet support and in anticipation of the discontinuation of Flash. Changing the editor back to these older versions would not only undo years of hard work by the Scratch Team, but they also might not work online anymore. If you wish, you can download the Scratch 1.4 and Scratch 2.0 offline editors.

The Scratch Team is still working on bug fixes, new features, and other improvements on the Scratch 3.0 editor. The new interface was created in such a way that it is easy for the Scratch Team to keep working on improvements. The Scratch Team will continue to evaluate constructive feedback on how they could improve upon the current Scratch editor.

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

2.4 Revert back to older versions of the Scratch editor
The Scratch editor has to update sometimes to accommodate certain changes. In particular, an online editor that ran off of Adobe Flash (rather than Java) was added in the Scratch 2.0 editor, and the Scratch 3.0 editor was created for tablet support and in anticipation of the discontinuation of Flash. Changing the editor back to these older versions would not only undo years of hard work by the Scratch Team, but they also might not work online anymore. If you wish, you can download the Scratch 1.4 and Scratch 2.0 offline editors.

The Scratch Team is still working on bug fixes, new features, and other improvements on the Scratch 3.0 editor. The new interface was created in such a way that it is easy for the Scratch Team to keep working on improvements. The Scratch Team will continue to evaluate constructive feedback on how they could improve upon the current Scratch editor.

I’d suggest changing this a little:
-Scratch 3.0 was made to take advantage of JavaScript, and development began before Adobe even announced Flash was to be discontinued, right?
-3.0 uses JavaScript, not Java. They’re really different.(unless you meant 1.x, which it used Squeak, which might have been Java, but I think it was JavaScript)

medians wrote:

PaperMarioFan2022 wrote:

henhenboben wrote:

creeperyeettt wrote:

(#7299)

EtheBee wrote:

say [make mobile app] for (forever) secs

thats rejected fully

no its accepted they are making a mobile app

Excuse me? Did you not read TOLORS? THIS IS FULLY REJECTED BY ST

King of the page (I am so good at getting this role ngl).

Why do they have ScratchJR and the mobile app on Android tablets then?

medians wrote:

PaperMarioFan2022 wrote:

henhenboben wrote:

creeperyeettt wrote:

(#7299)

EtheBee wrote:

say [make mobile app] for (forever) secs

thats rejected fully

no its accepted they are making a mobile app

Excuse me? Did you not read TOLORS? THIS IS FULLY REJECTED BY ST

King of the page (I am so good at getting this role ngl).

Why do they have ScratchJR and the mobile app on Android tablets then?

PaperMarioFan2022 wrote:

medians wrote:

PaperMarioFan2022 wrote:

henhenboben wrote:

creeperyeettt wrote:

(#7299)

EtheBee wrote:

say [make mobile app] for (forever) secs

thats rejected fully

no its accepted they are making a mobile app

Excuse me? Did you not read TOLORS? THIS IS FULLY REJECTED BY ST

King of the page (I am so good at getting this role ngl).

Why do they have ScratchJR and the mobile app on Android tablets then?

Because they don't allow users to change the code, and they just make the scripts. Apple is very strict with their App Store poilcy when it comes to programs and coding languages like Scratch.

medians wrote:

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

2.4 Revert back to older versions of the Scratch editor
The Scratch editor has to update sometimes to accommodate certain changes. In particular, an online editor that ran off of Adobe Flash (rather than Java) was added in the Scratch 2.0 editor, and the Scratch 3.0 editor was created for tablet support and in anticipation of the discontinuation of Flash. Changing the editor back to these older versions would not only undo years of hard work by the Scratch Team, but they also might not work online anymore. If you wish, you can download the Scratch 1.4 and Scratch 2.0 offline editors.

The Scratch Team is still working on bug fixes, new features, and other improvements on the Scratch 3.0 editor. The new interface was created in such a way that it is easy for the Scratch Team to keep working on improvements. The Scratch Team will continue to evaluate constructive feedback on how they could improve upon the current Scratch editor.

I’d suggest changing this a little:
-Scratch 3.0 was made to take advantage of JavaScript, and development began before Adobe even announced Flash was to be discontinued, right?
-3.0 uses JavaScript, not Java. They’re really different.(unless you meant 1.x, which it used Squeak, which might have been Java, but I think it was JavaScript)

Oh my god how did I never realize this was on here LOL
Also, Squeak was an implementation of something called Smalltalk
Also, yeah. Development on 3.0 started in 2016, and Adobe Flash announced to be discontinued in 2017.

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

medians wrote:

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

2.4 Revert back to older versions of the Scratch editor
The Scratch editor has to update sometimes to accommodate certain changes. In particular, an online editor that ran off of Adobe Flash (rather than Java) was added in the Scratch 2.0 editor, and the Scratch 3.0 editor was created for tablet support and in anticipation of the discontinuation of Flash. Changing the editor back to these older versions would not only undo years of hard work by the Scratch Team, but they also might not work online anymore. If you wish, you can download the Scratch 1.4 and Scratch 2.0 offline editors.

The Scratch Team is still working on bug fixes, new features, and other improvements on the Scratch 3.0 editor. The new interface was created in such a way that it is easy for the Scratch Team to keep working on improvements. The Scratch Team will continue to evaluate constructive feedback on how they could improve upon the current Scratch editor.

I’d suggest changing this a little:
-Scratch 3.0 was made to take advantage of JavaScript, and development began before Adobe even announced Flash was to be discontinued, right?
-3.0 uses JavaScript, not Java. They’re really different.(unless you meant 1.x, which it used Squeak, which might have been Java, but I think it was JavaScript)

Oh my god how did I never realize this was on here LOL
Also, Squeak was an implementation of something called Smalltalk
Also, yeah. Development on 3.0 started in 2016, and Adobe Flash announced to be discontinued in 2017.

I saw it a few months ago, before i know how websites work, and assumed that Java is what it uses. Well, i was wrong.

henhenboben wrote:

(#7300)

creeperyeettt wrote:

(#7299)

EtheBee wrote:

say [make mobile app] for (forever) secs

thats rejected fully

no its accepted they are making a mobile app

PaperMarioFan2022 wrote:

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

medians wrote:

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

2.4 Revert back to older versions of the Scratch editor
The Scratch editor has to update sometimes to accommodate certain changes. In particular, an online editor that ran off of Adobe Flash (rather than Java) was added in the Scratch 2.0 editor, and the Scratch 3.0 editor was created for tablet support and in anticipation of the discontinuation of Flash. Changing the editor back to these older versions would not only undo years of hard work by the Scratch Team, but they also might not work online anymore. If you wish, you can download the Scratch 1.4 and Scratch 2.0 offline editors.

The Scratch Team is still working on bug fixes, new features, and other improvements on the Scratch 3.0 editor. The new interface was created in such a way that it is easy for the Scratch Team to keep working on improvements. The Scratch Team will continue to evaluate constructive feedback on how they could improve upon the current Scratch editor.

I’d suggest changing this a little:
-Scratch 3.0 was made to take advantage of JavaScript, and development began before Adobe even announced Flash was to be discontinued, right?
-3.0 uses JavaScript, not Java. They’re really different.(unless you meant 1.x, which it used Squeak, which might have been Java, but I think it was JavaScript)

Oh my god how did I never realize this was on here LOL
Also, Squeak was an implementation of something called Smalltalk
Also, yeah. Development on 3.0 started in 2016, and Adobe Flash announced to be discontinued in 2017.

I saw it a few months ago, before i know how websites work, and assumed that Java is what it uses. Well, i was wrong.

I still don't understand how ST thinks this is a bad idea, and why it's rejected by them to revert to the older editor anyway.

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

2.0 used Flash, discontinued so you need an extension to support it which they don’t allow the mentioning of anyways, and 1.x used Squeak. Those are either deprecated or tough to implement in the browser well enough to even attempt support.

medians wrote:

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

2.0 used Flash, discontinued so you need an extension to support it which they don’t allow the mentioning of anyways, and 1.x used Squeak. Those are either deprecated or tough to implement in the browser well enough to even attempt support.

You can't actually use that extension on 2.0 though, you have to actually get Flash because Scratch 2.0 used AS3.

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

medians wrote:

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

2.0 used Flash, discontinued so you need an extension to support it which they don’t allow the mentioning of anyways, and 1.x used Squeak. Those are either deprecated or tough to implement in the browser well enough to even attempt support.

You can't actually use that extension on 2.0 though, you have to actually get Flash because Scratch 2.0 used AS3.

I’m not referencing the Scratch extension, i mean a general browser extension.

GlitchInTheMatrix wrote:

2.0 used Flash, discontinued so you need an extension to support it which they don’t allow the mentioning of anyways, and 1.x used Squeak. Those are either deprecated or tough to implement in the browser well enough to even attempt support.

medians wrote:

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

medians wrote:

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

2.0 used Flash, discontinued so you need an extension to support it which they don’t allow the mentioning of anyways, and 1.x used Squeak. Those are either deprecated or tough to implement in the browser well enough to even attempt support.

You can't actually use that extension on 2.0 though, you have to actually get Flash because Scratch 2.0 used AS3.

I’m not referencing the Scratch extension, i mean a general browser extension.

No, it doesn't support AS3 is what I mean, so you have to download Flash (either by disabling the timebomb or the latest version without the timebomb).

PaperMarioFan2022 wrote:

GlitchInTheMatrix wrote:

2.0 used Flash, discontinued so you need an extension to support it which they don’t allow the mentioning of anyways, and 1.x used Squeak. Those are either deprecated or tough to implement in the browser well enough to even attempt support.

Ah, okay. Now it's starting to make sense to me. So ST thought that it would be very tough to implement on limited resourced I guess? That's fair, but still it would be pretty neat to have it implemented subsided.

Za-Chary wrote:

3.3 Ban certain franchises – just report inappropriate projects

wikibro300000 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

3.3 Ban certain franchises – just report inappropriate projects

Darn, serously?! Now im worried about the fact that spongebob projects are always gonna be everywhere. They serously make me like:
AHHGHH

PaperMarioFan2022 wrote:

wikibro300000 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

3.3 Ban certain franchises – just report inappropriate projects

Darn, serously?! Now im worried about the fact that spongebob projects are always gonna be everywhere. They serously make me like:
AHHGHH

They can have copyright ©️ as the symbol is below the project boarder (located next to the report button).

7salad3salad wrote:

PaperMarioFan2022 wrote:

wikibro300000 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

3.3 Ban certain franchises – just report inappropriate projects

Darn, serously?! Now im worried about the fact that spongebob projects are always gonna be everywhere. They serously make me like:
AHHGHH

They can have copyleft © symbol as is below the project boarder (located next to the report button).

What

7salad3salad wrote:

(#7320)

PaperMarioFan2022 wrote:

wikibro300000 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

3.3 Ban certain franchises – just report inappropriate projects

Darn, serously?! Now im worried about the fact that spongebob projects are always gonna be everywhere. They serously make me like:
AHHGHH

They can have copyright ©️ as the symbol is below the project boarder (located next to the report button).

What