Boycott reCAPTCHA (17-23 April)

INSERT-USER_NAME

PPPDUD wrote:
applejuiceproduc wrote:
BreadcatGames wrote:
SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:
GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:
snip
Don't post TIFF images. They're designed for faxing and browsers can't show them.
I can see it just fine
Same
Not me.
My browser / operating system: Windows NT 11.0, Chrome 111.0.0.0, No Flash version detected

Also not me.
My browser / operating system: ChromeOS 14541.0.0, Chrome 111.0.0.0, No Flash version detected

uwv

smartest savvysclutter post for real. (fyi instead of complaining about recaptcha not supporting old browsers why don't you get a phone that is still supported)

Caroix

INSERT-USER_NAME wrote:
PPPDUD wrote:
applejuiceproduc wrote:
BreadcatGames wrote:
SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:
GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:
snip
Don't post TIFF images. They're designed for faxing and browsers can't show them.
I can see it just fine
Same
Not me.
My browser / operating system: Windows NT 11.0, Chrome 111.0.0.0, No Flash version detected
Also not me.
My browser / operating system: ChromeOS 14541.0.0, Chrome 111.0.0.0, No Flash version detected

I can see them perfectly fine
My browser / operating system: Android Linux 12.0, Chrome 92.0.0.0

INSERT-USER_NAME

uwv wrote:
smartest savvysclutter post for real. (fyi instead of complaining about recaptcha not supporting old browsers why don't you get a phone that is still supported)

I like to think that savvy thinks of old technology like how medians thinks of Scratch 2.0,

NanoRook

This has got to be satire.

EDIT:

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:
reCAPTCHA is more likely to consider you a bot if you use Linux or have no Google account, collects hardware info and browsing history and is unnecessary for most sites.

I would like to know what planet you live on where you consider rate limiting “unnecessary.”

Last edited by NanoRook (April 13, 2023 20:07:50)

__evelyn

scratch uses recaptcha :mindblown:

SAVVYSCLUTTER

uwv wrote:
why don't you get a phone that is still supported

https://www.cvedetails.com/product/19997/Google-Android.html?vendor_id=1224
https://www.cvedetails.com/product/15556/Apple-Iphone-Os.html?vendor_id=49

bigspeedfpv

NanoRook wrote:
I would like to know what planet you live on where you consider rate limiting “unnecessary.”

the scratch world where every site is hosted on replit and is too slow to be affected by ratelimiting in the first place

uwv wrote:
smartest savvysclutter post for real. (fyi instead of complaining about recaptcha not supporting old browsers why don't you get a phone that is still supported)

for real you can get old pixels for like $50 fire emoji fire emoji one hundred emoji

Steve0Greatness

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:
I won't visit any sites that use it for a week.

So… none of the sites that have any actual reason to go to them?

SAVVYSCLUTTER

bigspeedfpv wrote:
you can get old pixels for like $50

Cost isn't the issue. Android has had 5083 vulnerabilities and BBOS has had none.

INSERT-USER_NAME

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:
bigspeedfpv wrote:
you can get old pixels for like $50
Cost isn't the issue. Android has had 5083 vulnerabilities and BBOS has had none.

I'm pretty sure that's because no one would care to make malware for such an old and obscure phone operating system.

ajskateboarder

SuperSonicmario wrote:
BreadcatGames wrote:
People aren’t going to go out of their way so you can use a browser that barely even supports HTTPS
The HTTPS protocol was introduced in 1994.

I think they meant modern versions of TLS

PPPDUD wrote:
My browser / operating system: Windows NT 11.0, Chrome 111.0.0.0, No Flash version detected

Windows 11 uses the same kernel as Windows 10, so it should say “Windows NT 10.0”

__evelyn

I am currently making my own captcha library. It generates images like this:
https://u.cubeupload.com/evelyn___/36zGFO.png
https://u.cubeupload.com/evelyn___/D8rLWJ.png
https://u.cubeupload.com/evelyn___/SqmrT9.png

ScratchCatHELLO

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:
bigspeedfpv wrote:
you can get old pixels for like $50
Cost isn't the issue. Android has had 5083 vulnerabilities and BBOS has had none.

a brick also has no vulnerabilities. old blackberry phones just can’t handle modern stuff. there’s no good reason normal developers should permanently support ancient tech.

PPPDUD

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:
bigspeedfpv wrote:
you can get old pixels for like $50
Cost isn't the issue. Android has had 5083 vulnerabilities and BBOS has had none.

Think about it. Commodore BASIC doesn't have any vulnerabilities, because there's no value in making a Commodore virus anymore.

ajskateboarder

__evelyn wrote:
I am currently making my own captcha library. It generates images like this:
https://u.cubeupload.com/evelyn___/36zGFO.png
https://u.cubeupload.com/evelyn___/D8rLWJ.png
https://u.cubeupload.com/evelyn___/SqmrT9.png

Ah, traditional CAPTCHAs

Your linked images could be deciphered, though

bigspeedfpv

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:
bigspeedfpv wrote:
you can get old pixels for like $50
Cost isn't the issue. Android has had 5083 vulnerabilities and BBOS has had none.

do you realize how silly you sound? “I want developers to support this OS because it has no vulnerabilities because nobody supports the OS”

INSERT-USER_NAME

ajskateboarder wrote:
PPPDUD wrote:
My browser / operating system: Windows NT 11.0, Chrome 111.0.0.0, No Flash version detected
Windows 11 uses the same kernel as Windows 10, so it should say “Windows NT 10.0”

I think PPPDUD might have modified the Windows version number in the registry so that Windows 11 actually recognized itself as Windows 11

PPPDUD

INSERT-USER_NAME wrote:
ajskateboarder wrote:
PPPDUD wrote:
My browser / operating system: Windows NT 11.0, Chrome 111.0.0.0, No Flash version detected
Windows 11 uses the same kernel as Windows 10, so it should say “Windows NT 10.0”
I think PPPDUD might have modified the Windows version number in the registry so that Windows 11 actually recognized itself as Windows 11

No, I just edited the text.

__evelyn

PPPDUD wrote:
applejuiceproduc wrote:
BreadcatGames wrote:
SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:
GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:
snip
Don't post TIFF images. They're designed for faxing and browsers can't show them.
I can see it just fine
Same
Not me.
My browser / operating system: Windows NT 11.0, Chrome 111.0.0.0, No Flash version detected

Windows NT 11.0 does not exist.

Discuss Scratch