_Icicle-Cube_ wrote:

(#60)
you'd be surprised how dumb filters can be.
also uhm, having your face in your pfp is currently banned.

You don't even have to be an expert with this sort of stuff to just Google a face filter and find this exists (it has an accuracy of 99.31%)

Also I guess using your face in a PFP counts as personal information because of reverse image search, but what if you use a publicly available image of some celebrity/figure?

Bump

ajskateboarder wrote:

_Icicle-Cube_ wrote:

(#60)
you'd be surprised how dumb filters can be.
also uhm, having your face in your pfp is currently banned.

You don't even have to be an expert with this sort of stuff to just Google a face filter and find this exists (it has an accuracy of 99.31%)

Also I guess using your face in a PFP counts as personal information because of reverse image search, but what if you use a publicly available image of some celebrity/figure?

or fictional character.

Miiraaya wrote:

starhero5697 wrote:

Just report the profile pictures.

Agreed, yet people can just put a new one of the same thing up

then they get blocked, they repeat it again and they get permabanned?

Bump

Bump

Bump

bump because duplicate. But, this will and can be hard to implement when you think about it since the AI or Filter needs to check every bit of pixel on the PFP size.
idrk if i posted here before, if so please don't quote it, i hate old things made by me.

I support this if the AI can do all of that. I think that this could really help ST out with bad pfps on Scratch since pfps are reported manually, and it would be pretty sweet if that was something included in Scratch filter moderation!

Sorry I brought this up again, I made a new topic about this one. You can see here: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/683493/

Knightbot63 wrote:

bump because duplicate. But, this will and can be hard to implement when you think about it since the AI or Filter needs to check every bit of pixel on the PFP size.
idrk if i posted here before, if so please don't quote it, i hate old things made by me.

I didn’t know it was a duplicate of this one, so that’s my fault.

Whoops. How did I dupe that?

ajskateboarder wrote:

_Icicle-Cube_ wrote:

(#60)
you'd be surprised how dumb filters can be.
also uhm, having your face in your pfp is currently banned.

You don't even have to be an expert with this sort of stuff to just Google a face filter and find this exists (it has an accuracy of 99.31%)

Also I guess using your face in a PFP counts as personal information because of reverse image search, but what if you use a publicly available image of some celebrity/figure?

There was someone putting a pfp as an person who was (well, it was pretty bad + inappropriate that’s what I’ll say) on @griffpatch before, so that’s why we need this.

Bump

Since there are a lot of different people the faces could be, maybe it wouldn’t ban them but it would weapons and other things like that instead?

Bring Up My Post