cs3868895 wrote:

So what if someone were to access your minecraft world without permission?

Couldn't someone also just join the world from Minecraft.

cs3868895 wrote:

cwkelliott47732 wrote:

Mr_PenguinAlex wrote:

why would we need this
just go do the minecraft coding thing on code.org

That doesn't even connect to real Minecraft.

I feel like that's if you wanted to make your own minecraft mod, unless someone wanted to make a minecraft mod connecting scratch and minecraft together…

Maybe just put this extension in Scratch officially.

cwkelliott47732 wrote:

cs3868895 wrote:

cwkelliott47732 wrote:

Mr_PenguinAlex wrote:

why would we need this
just go do the minecraft coding thing on code.org

That doesn't even connect to real Minecraft.

I feel like that's if you wanted to make your own minecraft mod, unless someone wanted to make a minecraft mod connecting scratch and minecraft together…

Maybe just put this extension in Scratch officially.

blocked but, huh, it can work as a mod, I feel like making it an extension is best lol-

Minecraft already has an ENTIRE DEDICATED VERSION to this. I really don't think this is worth the trouble.

Does Scratch really want to reimplement the Minecraft client protocol in JavaScript? No support, just use Minecraft Datapacks

cwkelliott47732 wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

Crispydogs101 wrote:

Knightbot63 wrote:

How's this useful. Also,

C O P Y R I G H T

Notch could collab with scratch like BBC did with the microbit. But that would be rare.

Notch doesn’t work for mojang anymore

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

Knightbot63 wrote:

How's this useful. Also,

C O P Y R I G H T

It’s definitely a joke topic
Ik because

cwkelliott47732 wrote:

I am suggesting a Scratch extension to interact with Minecraft. Here are the blocks it would have:

when [connected v] :: extension hat
connect to cracked minecraft server at [example.net:25565] with username [Scratcher1234] :: extension//this

No other explanation as to why it would be cracked, it’s obviously illegal

So this has to be a joke topic

the op knows cracked servers are illegal, otherwise they wouldn’t know what a cracked server is,
So it must be a joke otherwise they are seriously trying to suggest breaking the law
And there’s also no option to connect to a non cracked server

It's cracked because if not, users would need to enter their passwords into Scratch projects. Maybe it would interact with a mod, instead?

cracked servers are legal. Playing on a cracked version of minecraft is not.

The_Game_ wrote:

Minecraft already has an ENTIRE DEDICATED VERSION to this. I really don't think this is worth the trouble.

^^^^

Minecraft raspberry pi

ideapad-320 wrote:

Playing on a cracked version of minecraft is not [illegal].

Yes it is.

Me when:
someone builds an innapropriate image in minecraft with this
someone overloads a minecraft server by sending in too many scratch clients
someone posts innapropriate text on scratch by having a server with items with innapropriate names
free minecraft account
impersonate famouse people because you can set your username to whatever you want
private messaging via item names

blablablahello wrote:

Me when:
someone builds an innapropriate image in minecraft with this
someone overloads a minecraft server by sending in too many scratch clients
someone posts innapropriate text on scratch by having a server with items with innapropriate names
free minecraft account
impersonate famouse people because you can set your username to whatever you want
private messaging via item names

A project could only allow one player at a time. So, if a player joins the server from playername1, and then joins from playername2, playername1 will be disconnected.

cwkelliott47732 wrote:

blablablahello wrote:

Me when:
someone builds an innapropriate image in minecraft with this
someone overloads a minecraft server by sending in too many scratch clients
someone posts innapropriate text on scratch by having a server with items with innapropriate names
free minecraft account
impersonate famouse people because you can set your username to whatever you want
private messaging via item names

A project could only allow one player at a time. So, if a player joins the server from playername1, and then joins from playername2, playername1 will be disconnected.

so players without accounts cant use it?
remix moment?

blablablahello wrote:

Me when:
someone builds an innapropriate image in minecraft with this
someone overloads a minecraft server by sending in too many scratch clients
someone posts innapropriate text on scratch by having a server with items with innapropriate names
free minecraft account
impersonate famouse people because you can set your username to whatever you want
private messaging via item names

How is that any different from building inappropriate images in Scratch?
I'm fixing the custom username thing - It will append “Scratch_” to their Scratch username.

cwkelliott47732 wrote:

snip-
How is that any different from building inappropriate images in Scratch?
I'm fixing the custom username thing - It will append “Scratch_” to their Scratch username.

first of all would be nice if u just replied to the whole thing but

It is different as while you can easily see that the project has an innapropriate image in scratch, if its in minecraft, it would instead be the server owner's problem, as noone can see it on scratch (its controlling the MINECRAFT player afterall), and unlike other minecraft accounts, this one cant be banned as you can easily either remix the project or change the username

Appending Scratch_ wouldn't help except IG server owners would now start banning any username starting with Scratch_ as those users are unmoderatable and can always come back in a different Scratch_ account without concequences

Basically, this allows many issues on the minecraft side as well as the scratch side, and issues on the minecraft side is absolutely unsolvable as Scratch_ accounts are unbannable due to how you can simply use a different username, and even if there are userID involved, you can simply remix the project or use another scratch account, and all of those would be undetectable on scratch due to how it all happens on minecraft and doesn't do anything in scratch

On further inspection this would actually be impossible to add

it would require a Minecraft client inside of Scratch itself, and that wouldn’t be possible because scratch runs on HTML 5 not java

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

On further inspection this would actually be impossible to add

it would require a Minecraft client inside of Scratch itself, and that wouldn’t be possible because scratch runs on HTML 5 not java

/print “why”

why

FanaticReturns wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

On further inspection this would actually be impossible to add

it would require a Minecraft client inside of Scratch itself, and that wouldn’t be possible because scratch runs on HTML 5 not java

/print “why”

why

Because Minecraft runs in Java and scratch does not???

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

FanaticReturns wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

On further inspection this would actually be impossible to add

it would require a Minecraft client inside of Scratch itself, and that wouldn’t be possible because scratch runs on HTML 5 not java

/print “why”

why

Because Minecraft runs in Java and scratch does not???

/printallcaps “u forgot about bedrock”

U FORGOT ABOUT BEDROCK

FanaticReturns wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

FanaticReturns wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

On further inspection this would actually be impossible to add

it would require a Minecraft client inside of Scratch itself, and that wouldn’t be possible because scratch runs on HTML 5 not java

/print “why”

why

Because Minecraft runs in Java and scratch does not???

/printallcaps “u forgot about bedrock”

U FORGOT ABOUT BEDROCK

Bedrock runs with C++, but i believe both languages can interact with JS, with some libraries of course, which would need to be on Scratch’s end, and really complex.

Microsoft definitely wants a monopoly on Scratch-likes that can connect to Minecraft. This won't happen, and if it does it'll be on cash cow badrock.

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

FanaticReturns wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

FanaticReturns wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

On further inspection this would actually be impossible to add

it would require a Minecraft client inside of Scratch itself, and that wouldn’t be possible because scratch runs on HTML 5 not java

/print “why”

why

Because Minecraft runs in Java and scratch does not???

/printallcaps “u forgot about bedrock”

U FORGOT ABOUT BEDROCK

Bedrock runs with C++, but i believe both languages can interact with JS, with some libraries of course, which would need to be on Scratch’s end, and really complex.

no