lolecksdeehaha wrote:

“the shell where the community does all of the work” isn't a very good tagline as it sounds like there are no official maintainers, and also the fact that there is no community, therefore no work being done.

Other than that, it's nice; it's a neat thing to make for fun.
(Also, you shouldn't put the EXE in the repo itself; keep the EXEs in the Releases, please.)

In the future, I might stop including the EXEs in the code area. Also, there are maintainers: me.

PPPDUD wrote:

lolecksdeehaha wrote:

“the shell where the community does all of the work” isn't a very good tagline as it sounds like there are no official maintainers, and also the fact that there is no community, therefore no work being done.

Other than that, it's nice; it's a neat thing to make for fun.
(Also, you shouldn't put the EXE in the repo itself; keep the EXEs in the Releases, please.)

In the future, I might stop including the EXEs in the code area. Also, there are maintainers: me.

I'm not saying there aren't maintainers, it just sounds like a horrible tagline to have as if it's begging for contributors, which OSS naturally gets.

PPPDUD wrote:

It isn't Windows-specific.

PPPDUD wrote:

There are no official prebuilt releases for Unix-like and Unix-based systems at the moment, along with other non-NT based OSes.

Which of these is correct?

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

PPPDUD wrote:

It isn't Windows-specific.

PPPDUD wrote:

There are no official prebuilt releases for Unix-like and Unix-based systems at the moment, along with other non-NT based OSes.

Which of these is correct?

It means there are no .deb or .rpm files, but it should work on Linux.

applejuiceproduc wrote:

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

PPPDUD wrote:

It isn't Windows-specific.

PPPDUD wrote:

There are no official prebuilt releases for Unix-like and Unix-based systems at the moment, along with other non-NT based OSes.

Which of these is correct?

It means there are no .deb or .rpm files, but it should work on Linux.

Exactly. If somebody can make .deb or .rpm versions, please do.

PPPDUD wrote:

lolecksdeehaha wrote:

“the shell where the community does all of the work” isn't a very good tagline as it sounds like there are no official maintainers, and also the fact that there is no community, therefore no work being done.

Other than that, it's nice; it's a neat thing to make for fun.
(Also, you shouldn't put the EXE in the repo itself; keep the EXEs in the Releases, please.)

In the future, I might stop including the EXEs in the code area. Also, there are maintainers: me.

the point of github is to store code, not the binaries

that's why it's called github and not apphub

lolecksdeehaha wrote:

PPPDUD wrote:

lolecksdeehaha wrote:

“the shell where the community does all of the work” isn't a very good tagline as it sounds like there are no official maintainers, and also the fact that there is no community, therefore no work being done.

Other than that, it's nice; it's a neat thing to make for fun.
(Also, you shouldn't put the EXE in the repo itself; keep the EXEs in the Releases, please.)

In the future, I might stop including the EXEs in the code area. Also, there are maintainers: me.

I'm not saying there aren't maintainers, it just sounds like a horrible tagline to have as if it's begging for contributors, which OSS naturally gets.

pacman is an example of what PPPDUD is trying to accomplish, but pacman is a command that comes with the ever-infamous Arch, so of course there are packages out there.

but since there are no contributors here, or even a proper way to install commands, there isn't anything to go off of.

PPPDUD wrote:

applejuiceproduc wrote:

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

PPPDUD wrote:

It isn't Windows-specific.

PPPDUD wrote:

There are no official prebuilt releases for Unix-like and Unix-based systems at the moment, along with other non-NT based OSes.

Which of these is correct?

It means there are no .deb or .rpm files, but it should work on Linux.

Exactly. If somebody can make .deb or .rpm versions, please do.

just set up github actions?

silvxrcat wrote:

lolecksdeehaha wrote:

PPPDUD wrote:

lolecksdeehaha wrote:

“the shell where the community does all of the work” isn't a very good tagline as it sounds like there are no official maintainers, and also the fact that there is no community, therefore no work being done.

Other than that, it's nice; it's a neat thing to make for fun.
(Also, you shouldn't put the EXE in the repo itself; keep the EXEs in the Releases, please.)

In the future, I might stop including the EXEs in the code area. Also, there are maintainers: me.

I'm not saying there aren't maintainers, it just sounds like a horrible tagline to have as if it's begging for contributors, which OSS naturally gets.

pacman is an example of what PPPDUD is trying to accomplish, but pacman is a command that comes with the ever-infamous Arch, so of course there are packages out there.

but since there are no contributors here, or even a proper way to install commands, there isn't anything to go off of.

Have you not read the release notes?! You use the “install” command to install commands.