musicROCKS013 wrote:

This shouldn’t be a thing. It would result in many false positives. For example, k0d3rrr’s pfp has his username in it, and it would detect those words and block him from using that pfp.

starhero5697 wrote:

In comments, there is already a filter for phone numbers, maybe if the PFP filter sees a string of numbers, they could censor it?/quote]

starhero5697 wrote:

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

(#32)

starhero5697 wrote:

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

NecroAnvil wrote:

If this were to be implemented, people would try to find out how it works and when they do, try to workaround it.

Why are you so against it?

They are not against it, they are just sharing their opinions.

They’ve been against it.
We accidentally made a duplicate and they were there and were against it.

Still, they were just sharing their opinions. Don't jump to conclusions, Besides, what's wrong with them being against the suggestion? Are you trying to make them support? Wait, do you even know how the support/no support convention works?

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

I was asking.I didn’t make it sound the best.
No.
Yes.
Just nvm.

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

I don’t ST has seen this/is considering this

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

(#44)
pareces estar tratando de actuar mucho mejor que yo. Creo que te saliste más del tema respondiendo a algo de hace unos días y comenzando una especie de discusión … si quieres responder, simplemente no quiero hacerlo. Si hablas español, entonces… ya veremos. Google traduce si realmente quieres ver lo que escribí con mayor precisión.

musicROCKS013 wrote:

(#46)

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

(#3)
pareces estar tratando de actuar mucho mejor que yo. Creo que te saliste más del tema respondiendo a algo de hace unos días y comenzando una especie de discusión … si quieres responder, simplemente no quiero hacerlo. Si hablas español, entonces… ya veremos. Google traduce si realmente quieres ver lo que escribí con mayor precisión.

Translated from English to Spanish: “You seem to be trying to act much better than me. I think you went further off topic by replying to something from a few days ago and starting some sort of discussion…if you want to reply, I just don't want to. If you speak Spanish, then… we'll see. Google translate if you really want to see what I wrote more accurately.”

starhero5697 wrote:

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

I don’t ST has seen this/is considering this

The ST considers the pros and cons of a suggestion before implementing them (source). Besides, they are busy fixing bugs and improving the server. Don't expect every suggestion that you think which is good to be implemented.

starhero5697 wrote:

musicROCKS013 wrote:

(#46)

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

(#3)
?

“ Good. We don't need any more off-topic posts.”

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

More than considering I don’t think they’ve seen this.you just ignored that part.and I didn’t say implementing or putting it In.I said considering.your are the only one who said implementing or putting it in.

starhero5697 wrote:

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

More than considering I don’t think they’ve seen this.you just ignored that part.and I didn’t say implementing or putting it In.I said considering.your are the only one who said implementing or putting it in.

How would we know if the ST is considering this suggestion?

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

starhero5697 wrote:

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

More than considering I don’t think they’ve seen this.you just ignored that part.and I didn’t say implementing or putting it In.I said considering.your are the only one who said implementing or putting it in.

How would we know if the ST is considering this suggestion?

Sometimes they post and a ST member did see our accidental duplicate and sent us here

musicROCKS013 wrote:

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

(#44)
pareces estar tratando de actuar mucho mejor que yo. Creo que te saliste más del tema respondiendo a algo de hace unos días y comenzando una especie de discusión … si quieres responder, simplemente no quiero hacerlo. Si hablas español, entonces… ya veremos. Google traduce si realmente quieres ver lo que escribí con mayor precisión.

Translated from English to Spanish: “You seem to be trying to act much better than me. I think you went further off topic by replying to something from a few days ago and starting some sort of discussion…if you want to reply, I just don't want to. If you speak Spanish, then… we'll see. Google translate if you really want to see what I wrote more accurately.”

CherryBlossoms-- wrote:

(#54)

musicROCKS013 wrote:

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

(#44)
pareces estar tratando de actuar mucho mejor que yo. Creo que te saliste más del tema respondiendo a algo de hace unos días y comenzando una especie de discusión … si quieres responder, simplemente no quiero hacerlo. Si hablas español, entonces… ya veremos. Google traduce si realmente quieres ver lo que escribí con mayor precisión.

Translated from English to Spanish: “You seem to be trying to act much better than me. I think you went further off topic by replying to something from a few days ago and starting some sort of discussion…if you want to reply, I just don't want to. If you speak Spanish, then… we'll see. Google translate if you really want to see what I wrote more accurately.”

?

musicROCKS013 wrote:

On post 44 they had some text in between that, when translated to Spanish writes this.

Prince_Wolf1 wrote:

(#44)
pareces estar tratando de actuar mucho mejor que yo. Creo que te saliste más del tema respondiendo a algo de hace unos días y comenzando una especie de discusión … si quieres responder, simplemente no quiero hacerlo. Si hablas español, entonces… ya veremos. Google traduce si realmente quieres ver lo que escribí con mayor precisión.

_Icicle-Cube_ wrote:

(#58)
no support, if there was a filter, that would mean that there could be the chance of a false positive.
Take my old alt's pfp for example
~snip~
the filter could think this is an actual face, when in reality. it was made using an icon maker. and isn't a real human's face
and thus, the pfp is taken down due to this filter thinking it's a real person

ajskateboarder wrote:

_Icicle-Cube_ wrote:

(#58)
no support, if there was a filter, that would mean that there could be the chance of a false positive.
Take my old alt's pfp for example
~snip~
the filter could think this is an actual face, when in reality. it was made using an icon maker. and isn't a real human's face
and thus, the pfp is taken down due to this filter thinking it's a real person

I think a face filter could have better accuracy than that

No support for filtering human faces, there's nothing wrong with them?