Redstone1080 wrote:

(#21)
Time to develop cheats for this when the source code comes out

uwv wrote:

(#22)

Redstone1080 wrote:

(#21)
Time to develop cheats for this when the source code comes out

real

Redstone1080 wrote:

im basically gonna port impact client to it

Redstone1080 wrote:

(#25)
A question for @uwv specifically: Do you put your type definitions in the same file, or in seperate .d.ts files? I just started working with TS and it seems clunky to have to have an interface for every class.

uwv wrote:

(#26)

Redstone1080 wrote:

(#25)
A question for @uwv specifically: Do you put your type definitions in the same file, or in seperate .d.ts files? I just started working with TS and it seems clunky to have to have an interface for every class.

classes have all the types already, i only use typedefs when i need to type a json object

class X {
    foo: string;
    bar: number;
    constructor() { 
        // ...
    }
}

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

Let's be realistic, this is a huge endeavor, impossible at best.

Redstone1080 wrote:

(#28)

uwv wrote:

(#26)

Redstone1080 wrote:

(#25)
A question for @uwv specifically: Do you put your type definitions in the same file, or in seperate .d.ts files? I just started working with TS and it seems clunky to have to have an interface for every class.

classes have all the types already, i only use typedefs when i need to type a json object

Oh do you mean you do it like this?

class X {
    foo: string;
    bar: number;
    constructor() { 
        // ...
    }
}

class X {
  private foo: string;
  public bar: number;
  protected baz: boolean;

  // accessible inside the class, outside the class and in child classes
  public myPublicFunction(): void {
    console.log("public");
  }
  
  // only accessible inside the class
  private myPrivateFunction(): void {
    console.log("private");
  }

  // accessible only inside the class and in child classes
  protected myProtectedFunction(): void {
    console.log("protected");
  }
}

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

(#29)
Let's be realistic, this is a huge endeavor, impossible at best.

completeness wrote:

uwv wrote:

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

(#29)
Let's be realistic, this is a huge endeavor, impossible at best.

… and the logger

You should have just used Log4J.

completeness wrote:

(#33)

uwv wrote:

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

(#29)
Let's be realistic, this is a huge endeavor, impossible at best.

… and the logger

You should have just used Log4J.

uwv wrote:

completeness wrote:

(#33)

uwv wrote:

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

(#29)
Let's be realistic, this is a huge endeavor, impossible at best.

… and the logger

You should have just used Log4J.

oh my god

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

Let's be realistic, this is a huge endeavor, impossible at best.

DifferentDance8 wrote:

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

Let's be realistic, this is a huge endeavor, impossible at best.

Congratulations! You just described Catalyst.

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

DifferentDance8 wrote:

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

Let's be realistic, this is a huge endeavor, impossible at best.

Congratulations! You just described Catalyst.

how is Catalyst impossible, it exists.