bump

bump

bump

bump

bump

bump

bump

bump

bump

bump

bump

bump

bump

bump

bump

I find this really similar to the z-index in HTML.
Support because you can manage layers better by this and not edit every “go to layer” when you add a new sprite.

I guess negative layer numbers should also exist because if you made a sprite at the bottom layer, you want to add a new sprite under that one.

At last, to confirm, is the lower the layer number is, the deeper it is in the layer hierarchy?

-iviedwall- wrote:

I find this really similar to the z-index in HTML.
Support because you can manage layers better by this and not edit every “go to layer” when you add a new sprite.

I guess negative layer numbers should also exist because if you made a sprite at the bottom layer, you want to add a new sprite under that one

This a good idea … it is like moving a sprite down layer many times at once. however negative layer numbers can be confusing. perhaps a

can be helpful? then, you can simply put a sprite behind all other by

-iviedwall- wrote:

I find this really similar to the z-index in HTML.
At last, to confirm, is the lower the layer number is, the deeper it is in the layer hierarchy?

I'm not sure what's meaning this. the layer hierarchy is, I think, will be like the costume list in the costume editor. layer one is at a top, and you can see the sprite that it is in it. from here, can create empty layers and move layer. however, if a sprite is “layer one” then it is displayed behind a “layer two” sprite on the Stage.

Do you think that adding empty layers could possible break a project?

musicROCKS013 wrote:

Do you think that adding empty layers could possible break a project?

Gee, I hope not . that would be bad for my suggestion .

bump