Mouse up workaround is toxic

IdkbutprobablyAmogus

Mouse up workaround is toxic bcz no one uses the workaround and make the

<not <mouse down?>>

to not work properly and make the mouse up boolean block to have the same traits as the workaround

Last edited by IdkbutprobablyAmogus (July 6, 2022 06:42:14)

Sadly, my signature is eaten by an evil kumquat

whenthesilly

How is it toxic? If it has the same traits as the workaround then there’s no point in adding it, since it’s only one block extra to add.

never omit emerald fish, for he will arrive.

TheSmartGuy1234

How is it toxic?

Joke you (can) take seriously -> It's a suggestion. You can't get directly physically hurt.

EDIT: adds some (BB)Code!

Last edited by TheSmartGuy1234 (July 6, 2022 07:27:40)

It's AF day in my timzone.

ST: celebrate AF day in your timezones
Me: I live in new zealand
ST: oh no nononono

you use

sudo sh -c 'echo "text" > file'

No, professionals use

echo 'text' | sudo tee file 1> /dev/null

Scroll* for more!

what are @SIMIA1358 and @TPRATTAY doing!??!?!
(2023/11/04 YEAR-MM-DD)
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/652044/?page=222#post-7453472
griffpatch appel is broken

Za_Chary wrote:

Games snippet:
10. yFzZ3MgsySzJLMv8yBzIfMqcynzJ04zLbMi8yNzJvNjM2KzYPNgsybzJLMi8yOzYzMk8yHzY3MmMyhzKrNlcytzYnMpcy6Ncy3zJLNoMyCzI7NisyQzL7Mhc2QzYrMkcyUzI7MisyBzKjNicyfzLHMrMymzJnMocygzYk

IdkbutprobablyAmogus

TheSmartGuy1234 wrote:
How is it toxic?

Joke you (can) take seriously -> It's a suggestion. You can't get directly physically hurt.

EDIT: adds some (BB)Code!

Bcz the workaround is the one who rejects the mouse up block

Sadly, my signature is eaten by an evil kumquat

DinoMaster20

So… what are you suggesting?

Last edited by DinoMaster20 (July 6, 2022 11:51:36)

Last edited by kaj (Tomorrow, 00:00:00)

~ ᴅᴍ20 ~
This is my forum signature! It shows up under every post I make! Here is more info!

ERRØR; THE NEXT BIG THING

“Resolved” Button for QaS

/\ Male /\ Forumer /\ TokTik /\ Chatsnap /\
/\ Scratch Wiki /\ Community Guidelines /\ Scratch Team /\ Postpercent /\ Ocular
Currently most active on the forums! I don't make projects, I might come out with one in 100 years.

thanks to rl1123 for gif, and hosting it bc my braindead self couldn't do it
I have eaten the rest of DinoMaster20's siggy! Yum! Find out how to stop evil kumquats like myself here: Evil Kumquat Guards

TheAnimalKingdom42

IdkbutprobablyAmogus wrote:
Mouse up workaround is toxic bcz no one uses the workaround

Firstly, I think almost everyone has used the workaround, and secondly, I don't think “toxic” is the word you're looking for.

IdkbutprobablyAmogus wrote:
make the
<not <mouse down?>>
to not work properly and make the mouse up boolean block to have the same traits as the workaround

Are you joking? They're not going to deliberately break projects because people used a harmless workaround.

DarthVader4Life

DinoMaster20 wrote:
So… what are you suggesting?

I think that they are suggesting to remove the functionality of the workaround and give it to the “mouse up” block.
Not gonna lie, that seems rather much and more importantly redundant, especially for a two block workaround. That's probably why it got rejected.

IdkbutprobablyAmogus wrote:
Mouse up workaround is toxic bcz no one uses the workaround -snip-

Couple of things, 1) if you're going to claim that a workaround is (somehow) toxic, explain, in detail, how it is toxic, and 2) if you are going to make a claim that no one uses a workaround, back up that claim.
Here, a workaround is literally a script or a piece of script. A workaround cannot be toxic, precisely because a workaround is not a person. A person can have malicious intent, but a script, or a workaround, does not have malicious intent, regardless of what it is used for. This is because a script, or workaround, is inanimate.

Be Moist

Also, here's a helpful link to Ocular
I am DV4L, Erector of Text Walls, Typer of Long Posts, Creator of Mini-mod posts
The kumquats have eaten this line, so I have to have a new way to repel them.
Had a bad day or are feeling bored? Watch this to make your day better in an interesting way.
Do you think you've been banned unfairly? Then you'd be wrong. The ST aren't children, so quit acting like they are.

medians

No, this would break a lot of projects

Medians bamboozled by 3.0 (version 3.0): https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/979822351/
hi875230163394: You're similar to valve in that you both hate a certain number…
Scratch 0.x, 1.x, 2.x, 3.x and LogoBlocks Archives
Bamboozlement: https://scratch.mit.edu/studios/33739789
Describe favorite topics: https://scratch.mit.edu/studios/35764610/
SP community won against Fandom :P
Years on internet: 16 (very close to 16)
medians: Oh god not this utc - 12 thing again..
Fun_Cupcake_i81: What, were you expecting not to see the utc - 12 thing again? THE UTC - 12 THIGN ALWAYS RETURNS. ALWAYS.
medians: I knew it would happen. I was the one who started it last year.
Fun_Cupcake_i81: Well then if you didn't want it back maybe you need to time travel to last year and fix that

Oh wait if you could time travel I think we all know exactly when you would go-
user1: That picture is from 2.0. Now he’s at my house and is my pet.
user2: But this is medians we're talking about, so “from 2.0” can mean the same thing as “from five seconds ago”.
Detect Scratch version here
My other accounts: @selfexplanatory @modesties @chaircard @fireflyhero @dividendyield @colloids @radians @skeuamorphism @dihectogon @anglebisector @aau- @EditBlockColors @AdamantOrb @MoongeistBeam @festively @Ampharos_ @straightforwardness @interchangeably
i trolled redcat LOL

if you see this

{what method did you use::control hat
answer on profile ::motion
} ::operators

;

ScolderCreations

This would be like removing costumes, making them unusable in any project, and adding a new tab called “appearances” that would do the exact same thing. I can't see why the Scratch Team would implement this.

Discuss Scratch