minikiwigeek2 wrote:

Here are some more mockups I painstakingly created using Inspect:


The message that appears where “Post Reply” would normally be when you don't have an invite.



The message that appears where “Post Reply” would normally be when you have an invite.



A message that you would receive if a collaboration owner invites you.


A message that the owner would receive if someone requested an invite.

I'll probably improve the first one later, but for now, tada!

Again, feel free to use these.

warriorcats2155 wrote:

minikiwigeek2 wrote:

<snip>.

Really, the reply gate is in collaborations and not in active collaborations? RPs can recruit members and host signups in collaborations, you know.

miniwikigeek2 wrote:

RPs can recruit members and host signups in collaborations, you know.

musicROCKS013 wrote:

Bumppppppp?

saverofthewo wrote:

robinz2.sg-host.com/videos/idklol/skeleman.jpg

guys i tried CDN if you wanna see the image just go to the link

musicROCKS013 wrote:

saverofthewo wrote:

robinz2.sg-host.com/videos/idklol/skeleman.jpg

guys i tried CDN if you wanna see the image just go to the link

You did what? Is this off topic?

RL1123 wrote:

-iviedwall- wrote:

Just because the Share Zone became completely public, there are still people sharing personal info on it, and since it's public, everyone will see them, including hackers, stalkers, etc. And that will higher the risk of getting hacked/stalked.

Well, you're technically not wrong, but I wouldn't call it accurate. You could still say the same about the rest of the site. People are still able to share their personal information and others with bad intentions can use this information. However, if it's completely public, the Scratch community will be able to report the project and let the ST know about it.

By the way, in the entire ~15-year history of Scratch, there have been no actual hackers.

-iviedwall- wrote:

This action is unnecessary since Scratch Team can see everything on Scratch, including unshared projects, deleted comments, etc, and also moderate them.

Again, it's technically not wrong, but it's not right either. The ST can see everything on Scratch and is able to moderate it, but do they have to power to moderate everything?

No. If you take a look at the page that lists ST members, you can see that there are about 66 people on the Scratch Team.

Tunde123 wrote:

RL1123 wrote:

-iviedwall- wrote:

Just because the Share Zone became completely public, there are still people sharing personal info on it, and since it's public, everyone will see them, including hackers, stalkers, etc. And that will higher the risk of getting hacked/stalked.

Well, you're technically not wrong, but I wouldn't call it accurate. You could still say the same about the rest of the site. People are still able to share their personal information and others with bad intentions can use this information. However, if it's completely public, the Scratch community will be able to report the project and let the ST know about it.

By the way, in the entire ~15-year history of Scratch, there have been no actual hackers.

-iviedwall- wrote:

This action is unnecessary since Scratch Team can see everything on Scratch, including unshared projects, deleted comments, etc, and also moderate them.

Again, it's technically not wrong, but it's not right either. The ST can see everything on Scratch and is able to moderate it, but do they have to power to moderate everything?

No. If you take a look at the page that lists ST members, you can see that there are about 66 people on the Scratch Team. I don't know how many of those are moderators, so we'll say all of them are moderators for the best-case scenario. As of writing, there are currently 689.880.382 unshared projects, so if we divide that by 66, we get about 10.5 million projects per moderator. Now assuming that a moderator can determine if a project is appropriate or not in 10 seconds, which is extremely quick, it'll take 3.3 years of non-stop working to get it done.

That's not a viable solution, so the ST relies on the community to report inappropriate content.

Some of the ST on that list retired. That list is outdated.