Discuss Scratch

lapisi
Scratcher
1000+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

-Rockstar_Edd- wrote:

(#19)

NinjaDog10J wrote:

Remember when we thought the crying child was mike afton

Thought??

I've seen WAYY too many (usually young) people think “Mike got biteded!!!” or “Mike is FNaF 3 Springtrap!! Porpl Goy is Scraptrap!!”
Painful, in my opinion. But I figure that they watched a Matpat video 10 minutes ago and said "this is canon, because [Youtuber] said so!"
fixed it, remember to put brackets inside the brackets so that it doesn't get treated like a tag
winterwolfy
Scratcher
1000+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

here's a little Easter egg in pizzeria simulator or if you didn't look close enough if you put lefty on the stage in his shoulder you can see the puppet's arm
ThatOneWeirdDude
Scratcher
1000+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

mrrecordman wrote:

And No gory theories please. I just made this topic because there were 600+ pages in the old topic. I also don’t play any fnaf games at all. However I will not abandon this topic. Just won’t discuss any theories.
So, you made a topic for the sake of making a topic?
-Rockstar_Edd-
Scratcher
100+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

lapisi wrote:

-Rockstar_Edd- wrote:

(#19)

NinjaDog10J wrote:

Remember when we thought the crying child was mike afton

Thought??

I've seen WAYY too many (usually young) people think “Mike got biteded!!!” or “Mike is FNaF 3 Springtrap!! Porpl Goy is Scraptrap!!”
Painful, in my opinion. But I figure that they watched a Matpat video 10 minutes ago and said "this is canon, because [Youtuber] said so!"
fixed it, remember to put brackets inside the brackets so that it doesn't get treated like a tag

pain > : (

Thank you, though!

winterwolfy wrote:

here's a little Easter egg in pizzeria simulator or if you didn't look close enough if you put lefty on the stage in his shoulder you can see the puppet's arm

Oh, really? That's kind of cool.

ThatOneWeirdDude wrote:

mrrecordman wrote:

And No gory theories please. I just made this topic because there were 600+ pages in the old topic. I also don’t play any fnaf games at all. However I will not abandon this topic. Just won’t discuss any theories.
So, you made a topic for the sake of making a topic?

…Uh. No? The original one had way too much traffic and got shut down. SOMEONE had to remake it and this was the first “official” one to pop up that the Forum ST saw. FNaF as a series is a bit more relevant after Security Breach, so some people will try to come here.

Last edited by -Rockstar_Edd- (April 30, 2022 00:03:16)

ThatOneWeirdDude
Scratcher
1000+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

-Rockstar_Edd- wrote:

ThatOneWeirdDude wrote:

mrrecordman wrote:

And No gory theories please. I just made this topic because there were 600+ pages in the old topic. I also don’t play any fnaf games at all. However I will not abandon this topic. Just won’t discuss any theories.
So, you made a topic for the sake of making a topic?

…Uh. No? The original one had way too much traffic and got shut down. SOMEONE had to remake it and this was the first “official” one to pop up that the Forum ST saw. FNaF as a series is a bit more relevant after Security Breach, so some people will try to come here.
The only posts the OP made in the original topic was the last 2 posts regarding the new topic. They clearly only made the topic because they wanted to own a popular topic. It would have been more fitting if an actual active member of that topic made it, not some post farming user.

Last edited by ThatOneWeirdDude (April 30, 2022 00:08:04)

-Rockstar_Edd-
Scratcher
100+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

ThatOneWeirdDude wrote:

-Rockstar_Edd- wrote:

ThatOneWeirdDude wrote:

mrrecordman wrote:

And No gory theories please. I just made this topic because there were 600+ pages in the old topic. I also don’t play any fnaf games at all. However I will not abandon this topic. Just won’t discuss any theories.
So, you made a topic for the sake of making a topic?

…Uh. No? The original one had way too much traffic and got shut down. SOMEONE had to remake it and this was the first “official” one to pop up that the Forum ST saw. FNaF as a series is a bit more relevant after Security Breach, so some people will try to come here.
The only posts the OP made in the original topic was the last 2 posts regarding the new topic. They clearly only made the topic because they wanted to own a popular topic. It would have been more fitting if an actual active member of that topic made it, not some post farming user.



I wouldn't say clearly. I want to give them the benefit of the doubt, although it is odd now that you mention it.

I do think we're getting offtopic though, more specifically talking about a user instead of what the forum was made for, seeing how a few people already migrated here.

BUT, I am still willing to look into it, just not here. Thank you.

nice pfp though**
-Rockstar_Edd-
Scratcher
100+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

To freshen up this topic for the two other people who semi-actively post here, I'll place an age old question since the OG forum dropped that topic:

Bite of 87

Who did it? And who didn't?

Personally. I'd outrule Foxy and Mangle, with how they can't exactly snap down and their jaws would go AROUND a human skull (think of an angle, yes, in math. that's what it'd look like). If you look closely at their FNaF 2 models their teeth aren't even sharp, they're dull at the edges. I could argue differently for FNaF 1 Foxy though, but his jaw is broken.
Withered Bonnie is obviously out, because of his lack of an upper jaw. Withered Chica's jaw seems to be jammed to the point she can't really move it.
Toy Chica does not have proper support for the mouth hidden by her beak. It is made out of metal, but she can't move it like we can with our mouths. And even then, the beak…is the same argument with Toy Freddy and Toy Bonnie
Toy Bonnie and Toy Freddy are a bit iffy, they can move their mouths but not to a concerning degree (also they seem to have their suits made out of plastic, which in itself can't cause severe damage.) If anything they could only just take an itty bitty nibble.


Remember:
The frontal lobe mentioned by Phone Guy and uncluttered Mangle's radio (edited) controls memory, impulse control, motor function, etc. It is at the very front. (Frontal Lobe, its in the name)

We need someone who can take a noticeable chunk in a specific area, not an entire object. So I even disagree with my past self saying its Withered Freddy, the only excuse I had at the time was “well it worked with Fredbear!!” and that he didn't seem as broken.

Last edited by -Rockstar_Edd- (April 30, 2022 00:38:18)

winterwolfy
Scratcher
1000+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

-Rockstar_Edd- wrote:

To freshen up this topic for the two other people who semi-actively post here, I'll place an age old question since the OG forum dropped that topic:

Bite of 87

Who did it? And who didn't?

Personally. I'd outrule Foxy and Mangle, with how they can't exactly snap down and their jaws would go AROUND a human skull (think of an angle, yes, in math. that's what it'd look like). If you look closely at their FNaF 2 models their teeth aren't even sharp, they're dull at the edges. I could argue differently for FNaF 1 Foxy though, but his jaw is broken.
Withered Bonnie is obviously out, because of his lack of an upper jaw. Withered Chica's jaw seems to be jammed to the point she can't really move it.
Toy Chica does not have proper support for the mouth hidden by her beak. It is made out of metal, but she can't move it like we can with our mouths. And even then, the beak…is the same argument with Toy Freddy and Toy Bonnie
Toy Bonnie and Toy Freddy are a bit iffy, they can move their mouths but not to a concerning degree (also they seem to have their suits made out of plastic, which in itself can't cause severe damage.) If anything they could only just take an itty bitty nibble.


Remember:
The frontal lobe mentioned by Phone Guy and uncluttered Mangle's radio (edited) controls memory, impulse control, motor function, etc. It is at the veryfront. (Frontal Lobe, its in the name)

We need someone who can take a noticeable chunk in a specific area, not an entire object. So I even disagree with my past self saying its Withered Freddy, the only excuse I had at the time was “well it worked with Fredbear!!” and that he didn't seem as broken.
well i personally think it was mangle who did it because mangle can still move its lower jaw ((i keep on loosing my freddy files book whenever i want to look at it QwQ))
-Rockstar_Edd-
Scratcher
100+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

winterwolfy wrote:

-Rockstar_Edd- wrote:

To freshen up this topic for the two other people who semi-actively post here, I'll place an age old question since the OG forum dropped that topic:

Bite of 87

Who did it? And who didn't?

Personally. I'd outrule Foxy and Mangle, with how they can't exactly snap down and their jaws would go AROUND a human skull (think of an angle, yes, in math. that's what it'd look like). If you look closely at their FNaF 2 models their teeth aren't even sharp, they're dull at the edges. I could argue differently for FNaF 1 Foxy though, but his jaw is broken.
Withered Bonnie is obviously out, because of his lack of an upper jaw. Withered Chica's jaw seems to be jammed to the point she can't really move it.
Toy Chica does not have proper support for the mouth hidden by her beak. It is made out of metal, but she can't move it like we can with our mouths. And even then, the beak…is the same argument with Toy Freddy and Toy Bonnie
Toy Bonnie and Toy Freddy are a bit iffy, they can move their mouths but not to a concerning degree (also they seem to have their suits made out of plastic, which in itself can't cause severe damage.) If anything they could only just take an itty bitty nibble.


Remember:
The frontal lobe mentioned by Phone Guy and uncluttered Mangle's radio (edited) controls memory, impulse control, motor function, etc. It is at the veryfront. (Frontal Lobe, its in the name)

We need someone who can take a noticeable chunk in a specific area, not an entire object. So I even disagree with my past self saying its Withered Freddy, the only excuse I had at the time was “well it worked with Fredbear!!” and that he didn't seem as broken.
well i personally think it was mangle who did it because mangle can still move its lower jaw ((i keep on loosing my freddy files book whenever i want to look at it QwQ))

I mean, yeah. Fair 'nuff.
winterwolfy
Scratcher
1000+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

update found the book it was up by my bed
mrrecordman
Scratcher
1000+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

Bump
NinjaDog10J
Scratcher
1000+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

-Rockstar_Edd- wrote:

To freshen up this topic for the two other people who semi-actively post here, I'll place an age old question since the OG forum dropped that topic:

Bite of 87

Who did it? And who didn't?

Personally. I'd outrule Foxy and Mangle, with how they can't exactly snap down and their jaws would go AROUND a human skull (think of an angle, yes, in math. that's what it'd look like). If you look closely at their FNaF 2 models their teeth aren't even sharp, they're dull at the edges. I could argue differently for FNaF 1 Foxy though, but his jaw is broken.
Withered Bonnie is obviously out, because of his lack of an upper jaw. Withered Chica's jaw seems to be jammed to the point she can't really move it.
Toy Chica does not have proper support for the mouth hidden by her beak. It is made out of metal, but she can't move it like we can with our mouths. And even then, the beak…is the same argument with Toy Freddy and Toy Bonnie
Toy Bonnie and Toy Freddy are a bit iffy, they can move their mouths but not to a concerning degree (also they seem to have their suits made out of plastic, which in itself can't cause severe damage.) If anything they could only just take an itty bitty nibble.


Remember:
The frontal lobe mentioned by Phone Guy and uncluttered Mangle's radio (edited) controls memory, impulse control, motor function, etc. It is at the very front. (Frontal Lobe, its in the name)

We need someone who can take a noticeable chunk in a specific area, not an entire object. So I even disagree with my past self saying its Withered Freddy, the only excuse I had at the time was “well it worked with Fredbear!!” and that he didn't seem as broken.
A classic question from the OG forum the first question on it if im correct
-Rockstar_Edd-
Scratcher
100+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

NinjaDog10J wrote:

-Rockstar_Edd- wrote:

To freshen up this topic for the two other people who semi-actively post here, I'll place an age old question since the OG forum dropped that topic:

Bite of 87

Who did it? And who didn't?

Personally. I'd outrule Foxy and Mangle, with how they can't exactly snap down and their jaws would go AROUND a human skull (think of an angle, yes, in math. that's what it'd look like). If you look closely at their FNaF 2 models their teeth aren't even sharp, they're dull at the edges. I could argue differently for FNaF 1 Foxy though, but his jaw is broken.
Withered Bonnie is obviously out, because of his lack of an upper jaw. Withered Chica's jaw seems to be jammed to the point she can't really move it.
Toy Chica does not have proper support for the mouth hidden by her beak. It is made out of metal, but she can't move it like we can with our mouths. And even then, the beak…is the same argument with Toy Freddy and Toy Bonnie
Toy Bonnie and Toy Freddy are a bit iffy, they can move their mouths but not to a concerning degree (also they seem to have their suits made out of plastic, which in itself can't cause severe damage.) If anything they could only just take an itty bitty nibble.


Remember:
The frontal lobe mentioned by Phone Guy and uncluttered Mangle's radio (edited) controls memory, impulse control, motor function, etc. It is at the very front. (Frontal Lobe, its in the name)

We need someone who can take a noticeable chunk in a specific area, not an entire object. So I even disagree with my past self saying its Withered Freddy, the only excuse I had at the time was “well it worked with Fredbear!!” and that he didn't seem as broken.
A classic question from the OG forum the first question on it if im correct

I brought it up cause people started to not respond and people started talkin abt Help Wanted and Security Breach. So age old question, I suppose
ScratchCreator2001
Scratcher
100+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

Williams death for anyone only just getting into FNAF:

William Afton: YOU’RE TOO LATE CHARLIE! I AM NOW FORKLIFT CERTIFIED! MWAHAHAHAHAH! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA- AAAAAA, AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH, OH MY GOD, WHAT THE H- AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-
mrrecordman
Scratcher
1000+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

Bump
mrrecordman
Scratcher
1000+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

mrrecordman wrote:

Bump
Bump
-Rockstar_Edd-
Scratcher
100+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

five nights at bumpys
carter2210
Scratcher
100+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

NinjaDog10J wrote:

Remember the we dont talk about bruno pardoy or cover or what ever its called, fnaf version
Yes, i do, and it was very cringe.
mrrecordman
Scratcher
1000+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

carter2210 wrote:

a
Please don’t make blank posts.
ScratchCreator2001
Scratcher
100+ posts

FNaF theories topic ll [potential spoilers] [New Banner!]

carter2210 wrote:

a
He is speaking the language of the gods

Powered by DjangoBB