Go To Layer (Ehh I dunno how many supporters --- a lot)

frodewin

Greenyman wrote:
Support. It can be difficult to do
go to front
go back (6.53654265462474) layers
(I don't know why I chose 6.53654265462474)

with multiple sprites/clones, because which one would go first? You can add a delay to before they go back, but with clones, that can be difficult to do. This would be really useful.

so true. I have a project that generates the background from a configurable number of tiles, each being a sprite. If you put a figure, that is another sprite, into the scene you want to be it on top of the upper part of the scene, but below the sprites below (which appear closer). After adding several other sprites it becomes practically impossible to find the right number for going back n layers. I haven't ever tried 6.53654265462474 though ;-)

Greenyman

Now I'm making a game that really needs this. Please Scratch team make this!!

MrSherlockHolmes

Support!

codjam1

Full Support!

CatsUnited

Support!

TheCodeVirus

Yes, pleeeeease… I'm so tired of things crossing in front and behind of things they shouldn't. Support!

Alberknyis

OmnipotentPotato wrote:
Theses blocks should be added:

Yes, they should be added.

But I honestly am never going to find a good reason to use them so why am I doing this?

mybearworld

FireFlakes_1

support! it would definitely help!

campioncottage

mybearworld wrote:

I would like to use this method, but is the MY BLOCK run without screen refresh?
Also, FULL SUPPORT

Do you support? ((S) + ((U) + ((P) + ((P) + ((O) + ((R) + (T))))))))

campioncottage

Actually i have found this method does not work for my purposes

medians

mockups:

go to layer () in [sprite v]::looks

go to layer () in [this sprite v]::looks

(layer of [sprite v] ::looks)

(layer of [this sprite v] ::looks)

go [forward v] layers () in [sprite v] ::looks

go [forward v] layers () in [this sprite v] ::looks

go [backwards v] layers () in [sprite v] ::looks

go [backwards v] layers () in [this sprite v] ::looks

go [behind v] of [sprite v] in [sprite v] ::looks

go [behind v] of [this sprite v] in [sprite v] ::looks

go [behind v] of [sprite v] in [this sprite v] ::looks

go [ahead v] of [sprite v] in [this sprite v] ::looks

go [ahead v] of [this sprite v] in [sprite v] ::looks

go to [back v] layer in [sprite v] ::looks

go to [back v] layer in [this sprite v] ::looks

go to [front v] layer in [this sprite v] ::looks

go to [front v] layer in [sprite v] ::looks

add layer ::looks

remove layer ::looks

remove all layers ::looks

modesties

campioncottage wrote:
Actually i have found this method does not work for my purposes

it should be:

define go to (layer)
go to [back v] layer ::looks
go [forward v] (layer) layers ::looks

1080GBA

modesties wrote:
campioncottage wrote:
Actually i have found this method does not work for my purposes
it should be:
define go to (layer)
go to [back v] layer ::looks
go [forward v] (layer) layers ::looks

you are totally wrong it should be:
it should be:

define go to (layer)
go to [front v] layer ::looks
go [backwards v] ((layer)-[1]) layers ::looks

Last edited by 1080GBA (March 22, 2022 14:37:05)

Jackson49_test

Bump

campioncottage

Griffpatch did a tutorial on this subject

mexicanboyrrv

campioncottage wrote:
Griffpatch did a tutorial on this subject

Please don't bump up old topics with unconstructive posts, thank you!

k0d3rrr

mexicanboyrrv wrote:
campioncottage wrote:
Griffpatch did a tutorial on this subject
Please don't bump up old topics with unconstructive posts, thank you!

That comment was 5 days after the previous comment, which does not make it a necropost*. Unless I'm confused. Or unless the rules have changed.
*For those who do not know what a ‘necropost’ is, it is an unconstructive post made on a topic that has been “dead” or inactive for one or more months.

mexicanboyrrv

k0d3rrr wrote:
mexicanboyrrv wrote:
campioncottage wrote:
Griffpatch did a tutorial on this subject
Please don't bump up old topics with unconstructive posts, thank you!
That comment was 5 days after the previous comment, which does not make it a necropost*. Unless I'm confused. Or unless the rules have changed.
*For those who do not know what a ‘necropost’ is, it is an unconstructive post made on a topic that has been “dead” or inactive for one or more months.

OMG I'M SO SORRY I THOUGHT IT SAID APRIL 4, 2021

k0d3rrr

mexicanboyrrv wrote:
k0d3rrr wrote:
mexicanboyrrv wrote:
campioncottage wrote:
Griffpatch did a tutorial on this subject
Please don't bump up old topics with unconstructive posts, thank you!
That comment was 5 days after the previous comment, which does not make it a necropost*. Unless I'm confused. Or unless the rules have changed.
*For those who do not know what a ‘necropost’ is, it is an unconstructive post made on a topic that has been “dead” or inactive for one or more months.
OMG I'M SO SORRY I THOUGHT IT SAID APRIL 4, 2021

I've made that mistake before. It's okay.

Discuss Scratch