Discuss Scratch

k0d3rrr
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Concept: Compact View

Transport This Topic To The Top!

And support. This reminds me of those images on Google of the Internet being connected using a modem… That was literally the Internet back then LOL.
7salad3salad
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Concept: Compact View

having to right-click for every block you want? this just seems too inconvinient.
qloakonscratch
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Concept: Compact View

reallysoftuser wrote:

Bacteria999 wrote:

If your computer can't render a lego piece in 2d you must be using an ENIAC.
You're forgetting that some scratch projects have like 600 blocks per sprite
You act like this suggestion will fix that.

Anyways, just looking at the pictures provided confuses me, and this grants the same issues as the “switch from 3.0 design to 2.0 design” rejected suggestion has, which is that it could be confusing for people using different designs.
Euglena73
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Concept: Compact View

It would be a nice idea, but it would be a little confused for new scratchers. Semi-support.
reallysoftuser
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Concept: Compact View

qloakonscratch wrote:

reallysoftuser wrote:

Bacteria999 wrote:

If your computer can't render a lego piece in 2d you must be using an ENIAC.
You're forgetting that some scratch projects have like 600 blocks per sprite
You act like this suggestion will fix that.

Anyways, just looking at the pictures provided confuses me, and this grants the same issues as the “switch from 3.0 design to 2.0 design” rejected suggestion has, which is that it could be confusing for people using different designs.
It's more of a mode, like a “performance mode” rather than just a design.
Maximouse
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Concept: Compact View

reallysoftuser wrote:

qloakonscratch wrote:

reallysoftuser wrote:

Bacteria999 wrote:

If your computer can't render a lego piece in 2d you must be using an ENIAC.
You're forgetting that some scratch projects have like 600 blocks per sprite
You act like this suggestion will fix that.

Anyways, just looking at the pictures provided confuses me, and this grants the same issues as the “switch from 3.0 design to 2.0 design” rejected suggestion has, which is that it could be confusing for people using different designs.
It's more of a mode, like a “performance mode” rather than just a design.
The way you interact with it is completely different from the “normal mode”, so it could still be confusing.
reallysoftuser
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Concept: Compact View

Bumped
reallysoftuser
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Concept: Compact View

Bumped

Powered by DjangoBB