Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
- sharkode
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
Currently, Scratch uses CC BY-SA licence, meaning anyone can take whatever is shared on Scratch and sell them or use them for commercial purposes without paying the creator a penny (This has rarely happened, but it has happened at least once as far as I know), I suggest that Scratch should use CC BY-NC-SA licence, which doesn't allow commercial use
Last edited by sharkode (Feb. 22, 2022 05:09:06)
- qloakonscratch
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
Currently, Scratch uses CC BY-SA licence, meaning anyone can take whatever is shared on Scratch and sell them or use them for commercial purposes (This has rarely happened, but it has happened at least once as far as I know), I suggest that Scratch should use CC BY-NC-SA licence, which doesn't allow commercial useThis would mean you wouldn't be able to sell your own Scratch project for real-life value.
- sharkode
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
Making money off your own project is fine, though, I think the “non-commercial use” is exclusively for other people (I think)Currently, Scratch uses CC BY-SA licence, meaning anyone can take whatever is shared on Scratch and sell them or use them for commercial purposes (This has rarely happened, but it has happened at least once as far as I know), I suggest that Scratch should use CC BY-NC-SA licence, which doesn't allow commercial useThis would mean you wouldn't be able to sell your own Scratch project for real-life value.
Also, why would share a project if you intend on making money off it?
- Prime689
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
deleted
Last edited by Prime689 (Feb. 22, 2022 04:49:02)
- sharkode
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
Can I sell my Scratch projects?Keep in mind that you are allowed to sell your projects commercially.
Yes: Your Scratch project is your creation. But keep in mind that once you share your project on the Scratch website, everyone is free to download, remix, and reuse the project based on the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license. So if you intend to sell your project, you may want to un-share it from the Scratch website.
Making money off your own project is fine, though, the “non-commercial use” is exclusively for other people (that also includes people who remix your projects, which is fair since other people shouldn't be selling work without your permission and you don't even get a cent)
Also, why would share a project if you intend on making money off it?
Last edited by sharkode (Feb. 22, 2022 05:20:30)
- qloakonscratch
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
1. No. It refers to all material made on Scratch, including your own things. Using this licence will disallow users to sell their projects.Making money off your own project is fine, though, I think the “non-commercial use” is exclusively for other people (I think)Currently, Scratch uses CC BY-SA licence, meaning anyone can take whatever is shared on Scratch and sell them or use them for commercial purposes (This has rarely happened, but it has happened at least once as far as I know), I suggest that Scratch should use CC BY-NC-SA licence, which doesn't allow commercial useThis would mean you wouldn't be able to sell your own Scratch project for real-life value.
Also, why would share a project if you intend on making money off it?
2. It might be a good project that you decide later on you want to sell.
- sharkode
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
Who cares? You own the project and you would not get into trouble if you don't sue yourself, which you probably won't, plus offline editors exist1. No. It refers to all material made on Scratch, including your own things. Using this licence will disallow users to sell their projects.Making money off your own project is fine, though, I think the “non-commercial use” is exclusively for other people (I think)Currently, Scratch uses CC BY-SA licence, meaning anyone can take whatever is shared on Scratch and sell them or use them for commercial purposes (This has rarely happened, but it has happened at least once as far as I know), I suggest that Scratch should use CC BY-NC-SA licence, which doesn't allow commercial useThis would mean you wouldn't be able to sell your own Scratch project for real-life value.
Also, why would share a project if you intend on making money off it?
2. It might be a good project that you decide later on you want to sell.
You can still sell the projects as long as you are the owner
The NonCommercial limitation applies to licensed uses only and does not restrict use by the licensor.
As with all CC licenses, the NC licenses only restrict what a reuser may do under the license and not what the licensor (rights holder) can do. Licensors that make their works available under an NC license are always free to monetize their works.
Last edited by sharkode (Feb. 22, 2022 05:18:13)
- qloakonscratch
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
Not every project has it's own Creative Commons license. Scratch has a singular Creative Commons license for every project. As such, according to this license, if it's created using Scratch materials, it can't be sold or used for non-commercial purposes.Who cares? You own the project and you would not get into trouble if you don't sue yourself, which you probably won't, plus offline editors exist1. No. It refers to all material made on Scratch, including your own things. Using this licence will disallow users to sell their projects.Making money off your own project is fine, though, I think the “non-commercial use” is exclusively for other people (I think)Currently, Scratch uses CC BY-SA licence, meaning anyone can take whatever is shared on Scratch and sell them or use them for commercial purposes (This has rarely happened, but it has happened at least once as far as I know), I suggest that Scratch should use CC BY-NC-SA licence, which doesn't allow commercial useThis would mean you wouldn't be able to sell your own Scratch project for real-life value.
Also, why would share a project if you intend on making money off it?
2. It might be a good project that you decide later on you want to sell.
You can still sell the projects as long as you are the ownerThe NonCommercial limitation applies to licensed uses only and does not restrict use by the licensor.
As with all CC licenses, the NC licenses only restrict what a reuser may do under the license and not what the licensor (rights holder) can do. Licensors that make their works available under an NC license are always free to monetize their works.
- sharkode
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
Source?Not every project has it's own Creative Commons license. Scratch has a singular Creative Commons license for every project. As such, according to this license, if it's created using Scratch materials, it can't be sold or used for non-commercial purposes.Who cares? You own the project and you would not get into trouble if you don't sue yourself, which you probably won't, plus offline editors exist1. No. It refers to all material made on Scratch, including your own things. Using this licence will disallow users to sell their projects.Making money off your own project is fine, though, I think the “non-commercial use” is exclusively for other people (I think)Currently, Scratch uses CC BY-SA licence, meaning anyone can take whatever is shared on Scratch and sell them or use them for commercial purposes (This has rarely happened, but it has happened at least once as far as I know), I suggest that Scratch should use CC BY-NC-SA licence, which doesn't allow commercial useThis would mean you wouldn't be able to sell your own Scratch project for real-life value.
Also, why would share a project if you intend on making money off it?
2. It might be a good project that you decide later on you want to sell.
You can still sell the projects as long as you are the ownerThe NonCommercial limitation applies to licensed uses only and does not restrict use by the licensor.
As with all CC licenses, the NC licenses only restrict what a reuser may do under the license and not what the licensor (rights holder) can do. Licensors that make their works available under an NC license are always free to monetize their works.
- qloakonscratch
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
https://scratch.mit.edu/terms_of_use/Source?Not every project has it's own Creative Commons license. Scratch has a singular Creative Commons license for every project. As such, according to this license, if it's created using Scratch materials, it can't be sold or used for non-commercial purposes.Who cares? You own the project and you would not get into trouble if you don't sue yourself, which you probably won't, plus offline editors exist1. No. It refers to all material made on Scratch, including your own things. Using this licence will disallow users to sell their projects.Making money off your own project is fine, though, I think the “non-commercial use” is exclusively for other people (I think)Currently, Scratch uses CC BY-SA licence, meaning anyone can take whatever is shared on Scratch and sell them or use them for commercial purposes (This has rarely happened, but it has happened at least once as far as I know), I suggest that Scratch should use CC BY-NC-SA licence, which doesn't allow commercial useThis would mean you wouldn't be able to sell your own Scratch project for real-life value.
Also, why would share a project if you intend on making money off it?
2. It might be a good project that you decide later on you want to sell.
You can still sell the projects as long as you are the ownerThe NonCommercial limitation applies to licensed uses only and does not restrict use by the licensor.
As with all CC licenses, the NC licenses only restrict what a reuser may do under the license and not what the licensor (rights holder) can do. Licensors that make their works available under an NC license are always free to monetize their works.
4. User-Generated Content and Licensing
4.3 All user-generated content you submit to Scratch is licensed to and through Scratch under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. This allows others to view and remix your content. This license also allows the Scratch Team to display, distribute, and reproduce your content on the Scratch website, through social media channels, and elsewhere. If you do not want to license your content under this license, then do not share it on Scratch.
- sharkode
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
Ok so technically I don't own my own projects, and I need to say “Thanks to Scratch for making my project that I made by myself” when uploading them elsewhere?https://scratch.mit.edu/terms_of_use/Source?Not every project has it's own Creative Commons license. Scratch has a singular Creative Commons license for every project. As such, according to this license, if it's created using Scratch materials, it can't be sold or used for non-commercial purposes.Who cares? You own the project and you would not get into trouble if you don't sue yourself, which you probably won't, plus offline editors exist1. No. It refers to all material made on Scratch, including your own things. Using this licence will disallow users to sell their projects.Making money off your own project is fine, though, I think the “non-commercial use” is exclusively for other people (I think)Currently, Scratch uses CC BY-SA licence, meaning anyone can take whatever is shared on Scratch and sell them or use them for commercial purposes (This has rarely happened, but it has happened at least once as far as I know), I suggest that Scratch should use CC BY-NC-SA licence, which doesn't allow commercial useThis would mean you wouldn't be able to sell your own Scratch project for real-life value.
Also, why would share a project if you intend on making money off it?
2. It might be a good project that you decide later on you want to sell.
You can still sell the projects as long as you are the ownerThe NonCommercial limitation applies to licensed uses only and does not restrict use by the licensor.
As with all CC licenses, the NC licenses only restrict what a reuser may do under the license and not what the licensor (rights holder) can do. Licensors that make their works available under an NC license are always free to monetize their works.4. User-Generated Content and Licensing
4.3 All user-generated content you submit to Scratch is licensed to and through Scratch under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. This allows others to view and remix your content. This license also allows the Scratch Team to display, distribute, and reproduce your content on the Scratch website, through social media channels, and elsewhere. If you do not want to license your content under this license, then do not share it on Scratch.
- qloakonscratch
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
Unless Scratch says you don't have to, which they do, then yes (though you do have to say they were made using Scratch)Ok so technically I don't own my own projects, and I need to say “Thanks to Scratch for making my project that I made by myself” when uploading them elsewhere?https://scratch.mit.edu/terms_of_use/Source?Not every project has it's own Creative Commons license. Scratch has a singular Creative Commons license for every project. As such, according to this license, if it's created using Scratch materials, it can't be sold or used for non-commercial purposes.Who cares? You own the project and you would not get into trouble if you don't sue yourself, which you probably won't, plus offline editors exist1. No. It refers to all material made on Scratch, including your own things. Using this licence will disallow users to sell their projects.Making money off your own project is fine, though, I think the “non-commercial use” is exclusively for other people (I think)Currently, Scratch uses CC BY-SA licence, meaning anyone can take whatever is shared on Scratch and sell them or use them for commercial purposes (This has rarely happened, but it has happened at least once as far as I know), I suggest that Scratch should use CC BY-NC-SA licence, which doesn't allow commercial useThis would mean you wouldn't be able to sell your own Scratch project for real-life value.
Also, why would share a project if you intend on making money off it?
2. It might be a good project that you decide later on you want to sell.
You can still sell the projects as long as you are the ownerThe NonCommercial limitation applies to licensed uses only and does not restrict use by the licensor.
As with all CC licenses, the NC licenses only restrict what a reuser may do under the license and not what the licensor (rights holder) can do. Licensors that make their works available under an NC license are always free to monetize their works.4. User-Generated Content and Licensing
4.3 All user-generated content you submit to Scratch is licensed to and through Scratch under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. This allows others to view and remix your content. This license also allows the Scratch Team to display, distribute, and reproduce your content on the Scratch website, through social media channels, and elsewhere. If you do not want to license your content under this license, then do not share it on Scratch.
This is because all user generated content is created through Scratch, using Scratch materials. Yes, you do own your projects, but Scratch owns them more than you do.
- sharkode
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
So if someone gives me a paintbrush and I use it to make a painting it's technically their painting and not mine?Unless Scratch says you don't have to, which they do, then yes (though you do have to say they were made using Scratch)Ok so technically I don't own my own projects, and I need to say “Thanks to Scratch for making my project that I made by myself” when uploading them elsewhere?https://scratch.mit.edu/terms_of_use/Source?Not every project has it's own Creative Commons license. Scratch has a singular Creative Commons license for every project. As such, according to this license, if it's created using Scratch materials, it can't be sold or used for non-commercial purposes.Who cares? You own the project and you would not get into trouble if you don't sue yourself, which you probably won't, plus offline editors exist1. No. It refers to all material made on Scratch, including your own things. Using this licence will disallow users to sell their projects.Making money off your own project is fine, though, I think the “non-commercial use” is exclusively for other people (I think)Currently, Scratch uses CC BY-SA licence, meaning anyone can take whatever is shared on Scratch and sell them or use them for commercial purposes (This has rarely happened, but it has happened at least once as far as I know), I suggest that Scratch should use CC BY-NC-SA licence, which doesn't allow commercial useThis would mean you wouldn't be able to sell your own Scratch project for real-life value.
Also, why would share a project if you intend on making money off it?
2. It might be a good project that you decide later on you want to sell.
You can still sell the projects as long as you are the ownerThe NonCommercial limitation applies to licensed uses only and does not restrict use by the licensor.
As with all CC licenses, the NC licenses only restrict what a reuser may do under the license and not what the licensor (rights holder) can do. Licensors that make their works available under an NC license are always free to monetize their works.4. User-Generated Content and Licensing
4.3 All user-generated content you submit to Scratch is licensed to and through Scratch under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. This allows others to view and remix your content. This license also allows the Scratch Team to display, distribute, and reproduce your content on the Scratch website, through social media channels, and elsewhere. If you do not want to license your content under this license, then do not share it on Scratch.
This is because all user generated content is created through Scratch, using Scratch materials. Yes, you do own your projects, but Scratch owns them more than you do.
- qloakonscratch
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
Not if you didn't use their canvas.~snip~So if someone gives me a paintbrush and I use it to make a painting it's technically their painting and not mine?
Last edited by qloakonscratch (Feb. 22, 2022 06:04:10)
- sharkode
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
Also ST can decide who to sue and who not to sue, meaning if I sell my own project ST could just go like “ok”, but if someone else sells my project and I make a complaint ST could goUnless Scratch says you don't have to, which they do, then yes (though you do have to say they were made using Scratch)Ok so technically I don't own my own projects, and I need to say “Thanks to Scratch for making my project that I made by myself” when uploading them elsewhere?https://scratch.mit.edu/terms_of_use/Source?Not every project has it's own Creative Commons license. Scratch has a singular Creative Commons license for every project. As such, according to this license, if it's created using Scratch materials, it can't be sold or used for non-commercial purposes.Who cares? You own the project and you would not get into trouble if you don't sue yourself, which you probably won't, plus offline editors exist1. No. It refers to all material made on Scratch, including your own things. Using this licence will disallow users to sell their projects.Making money off your own project is fine, though, I think the “non-commercial use” is exclusively for other people (I think)Currently, Scratch uses CC BY-SA licence, meaning anyone can take whatever is shared on Scratch and sell them or use them for commercial purposes (This has rarely happened, but it has happened at least once as far as I know), I suggest that Scratch should use CC BY-NC-SA licence, which doesn't allow commercial useThis would mean you wouldn't be able to sell your own Scratch project for real-life value.
Also, why would share a project if you intend on making money off it?
2. It might be a good project that you decide later on you want to sell.
You can still sell the projects as long as you are the ownerThe NonCommercial limitation applies to licensed uses only and does not restrict use by the licensor.
As with all CC licenses, the NC licenses only restrict what a reuser may do under the license and not what the licensor (rights holder) can do. Licensors that make their works available under an NC license are always free to monetize their works.4. User-Generated Content and Licensing
4.3 All user-generated content you submit to Scratch is licensed to and through Scratch under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. This allows others to view and remix your content. This license also allows the Scratch Team to display, distribute, and reproduce your content on the Scratch website, through social media channels, and elsewhere. If you do not want to license your content under this license, then do not share it on Scratch.
This is because all user generated content is created through Scratch, using Scratch materials. Yes, you do own your projects, but Scratch owns them more than you do.

- sharkode
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
alright, it's just confusing at this point, I should report this post to get the attention of ST so they can come here and explain the situationNot if you didn't use their canvas.~snip~So if someone gives me a paintbrush and I use it to make a painting it's technically their painting and not mine?
- qloakonscratch
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
Basically, if you use Scratch's tools to create something, then Scratch owns it. Simple as that, shouldn't be confusing.alright, it's just confusing at this point, I should report this post to get the attention of ST so they can come here and explain the situationNot if you didn't use their canvas.~snip~So if someone gives me a paintbrush and I use it to make a painting it's technically their painting and not mine?
- sharkode
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
What about the offline editor?Basically, if you use Scratch's tools to create something, then Scratch owns it. Simple as that, shouldn't be confusing.alright, it's just confusing at this point, I should report this post to get the attention of ST so they can come here and explain the situationNot if you didn't use their canvas.~snip~So if someone gives me a paintbrush and I use it to make a painting it's technically their painting and not mine?
- qloakonscratch
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
The offline editor is still Scratch's tools. They just can't do anything to it.What about the offline editor?Basically, if you use Scratch's tools to create something, then Scratch owns it. Simple as that, shouldn't be confusing.alright, it's just confusing at this point, I should report this post to get the attention of ST so they can come here and explain the situationNot if you didn't use their canvas.~snip~So if someone gives me a paintbrush and I use it to make a painting it's technically their painting and not mine?
- sharkode
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA
But Terms of Use didn't say thatThe offline editor is still Scratch's tools. They just can't do anything to it.What about the offline editor?Basically, if you use Scratch's tools to create something, then Scratch owns it. Simple as that, shouldn't be confusing.alright, it's just confusing at this point, I should report this post to get the attention of ST so they can come here and explain the situationNot if you didn't use their canvas.~snip~So if someone gives me a paintbrush and I use it to make a painting it's technically their painting and not mine?
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
-
» Use CC BY-NC-SA licence for projects instead of CC BY-SA


