Workaround:
Click reply on both then comment on both then your done!

Roblox888i wrote:

Workaround: Click reply on both then comment on both then your done!

That is a workaround, although it has some problems: it takes longer to post to comment then to post one, and on studios, posting an additional comment will take up some of the reply limit.

Frenzar wrote:

-DMUTests- wrote:

I don't exactly support being able to reply to 2 people, but I think you should be notified when somebody links to your username.

What if someone goes like: @Derpmeup @Blaze @BSH1 @Haiming…

Good point. That would allow someone to ping a range from about 80 (if they did all 3-letter usernames) to about 10-20 (if they did all long usernames) people at once, assuming that the mentions would count against the character limit.

9pfs wrote:

Frenzar wrote:

-DMUTests- wrote:

I don't exactly support being able to reply to 2 people, but I think you should be notified when somebody links to your username.

What if someone goes like: @Derpmeup @Blaze @BSH1 @Haiming…

Good point. That would allow someone to ping a range from about 80 (if they did all 3-letter usernames) to about 10-20 (if they did all long usernames) people at once, assuming that the mentions would count against the character limit.

Yes, but what we're saying is that you can only reply to people already in a comment chain.

MBZ_901 wrote:

9pfs wrote:

Frenzar wrote:

-DMUTests- wrote:

I don't exactly support being able to reply to 2 people, but I think you should be notified when somebody links to your username.

What if someone goes like: @Derpmeup @Blaze @BSH1 @Haiming…

Good point. That would allow someone to ping a range from about 80 (if they did all 3-letter usernames) to about 10-20 (if they did all long usernames) people at once, assuming that the mentions would count against the character limit.

Yes, but what we're saying is that you can only reply to people already in a comment chain.

Yes. On some threads, there are over 100 people.

9pfs wrote:

MBZ_901 wrote:

9pfs wrote:

Frenzar wrote:

-DMUTests- wrote:

I don't exactly support being able to reply to 2 people, but I think you should be notified when somebody links to your username.

What if someone goes like: @Derpmeup @Blaze @BSH1 @Haiming…

Good point. That would allow someone to ping a range from about 80 (if they did all 3-letter usernames) to about 10-20 (if they did all long usernames) people at once, assuming that the mentions would count against the character limit.

Yes, but what we're saying is that you can only reply to people already in a comment chain.

Yes. On some threads, there are over 100 people.

Well, then maybe there should be a limit to reply to maybe ten ppl at once. And in studios, you can only have a 25 long comment chain. So maybe that could be different.

Support! This happens a lot on big studios and it’s annoying and arkward to type ”/\”

I don't support, because this idea can easily be worked around. If you want to reply to two or more people, you can use a “^” symbol to mark that you are doing it. For example:

This way, you can send multiple people a message with your reply.

Support, especially since the studio reply limit is in place.

This is especially useful for talking to multiple users in a game development team, roleplay, or just chatting. This also makes giving others context easier.

However, I think this should only take effect in the thread you're talking on. Imagine Scratcher1, Scratcher2, and Scratcher3 were talking in a reply thread. Scratcher1 can reply to Scratcher2 and Scratcher3 at the same time, but not Scratcher4 since they have not yet talked in that line of replies.

panda-wat wrote:

I don't support, because this idea can easily be worked around. If you want to reply to two or more people, you can use a “^” symbol to mark that you are doing it. For example:

This way, you can send multiple people a message with your reply.

[sarcasm]Oh, right, I forgot you can just do the thing that this suggestion is trying to fix.[/sarcasm]

Highly support, it's so hard for me to reply to one person and then having to type “^”. If this gets added, I can easily reply to both

Lots of people wrote:

Support.

Please explain why you support

panda-wat wrote:

(#69)
I don't support, because this idea can easily be worked around. If you want to reply to two or more people, you can use a “^” symbol to mark that you are doing it. For example:

This way, you can send multiple people a message with your reply.

But isn't it easier just to type it in one?
-
This would be highly useful for group projects, so you don't have to use “^” over and over again.

EatNYeet wrote:

(#70)
However, I think this should only take effect in the thread you're talking on. Imagine Scratcher1, Scratcher2, and Scratcher3 were talking in a reply thread. Scratcher1 can reply to Scratcher2 and Scratcher3 at the same time, but not Scratcher4 since they have not yet talked in that line of replies.

True, you shouldn't be able to grab someone from another thread and bring them into your chats.

support, but it should work like forum quoting, where you can quote several people in one post, but perhaps with a cap on the number of people that can be mentioned, and obviously only people from the same thread so you cant just spam out griffpatch or someone easily

Support